|
>so does that mean because goonies was good, i have to like
>all his other films?
Yes. That is EXACTLY what I was getting at.
>
>and yes i am as smart as i sound fam, the process of attaining
>a ph.d as the first person in my family to go to college from
>a Black and Mexican working class family is evidence of that
>at the age of 26.
congrats to you and your black and mexican non degree holding family members.
>check yourself.
done
>i mearly pointed out the
>obvious that Spielberg is the most over-hyped,
>over-appreciated, A-list director in hollywood. and like i
>admitted i just chose him cause the other directors are no
>shit answers. and obviously it worked, being that you couldn't
>take some1 criticizing him.
wait...what "worked"?
>and parodize is a word dumbass,
no. its not.
>the process of trying to
>parody a parody.
...is called parody
This is off topic (whatever that may be at this point), but when you look at it, "parody" is a really weird looking word huh?
PARODY
parody
pa ro dy
Kinda like month. Or radar. Or ala. That's another word/phrase you use/employ wrong/non-right-like.
>even if it wasn't,
which it isn't
>one could make the
>arguement from a post-colonial stand point that the process of
>creating terms to explain modern phenomenon requires that new
>terms be made, which actually appens constantly in non-white
>supremacist fields of studies.
If ONE did make that argument they'd be a fool. If YOU made that argument it probably wouldn't make much sense. But, back to the aforementioned "ONE" trying to make this inane argument...if ONE made the argument, from a Post-cereal stand point, as you say, "...that the process of creating terms to explain modern phenomenon requires that new terms be made..." they'd be calling parody a strictly modern phenomena, right? And not only that, but they would also then be allowing that there are no existing words in the King's English to describe such a revolutionary modern phenomena. Right? And you, being the first 26 year old Black Bean pee eightch dee in tu familia, would most certainly have the cognizant capacity to understand that such a word does, in fact, exist, right??!! Of course you would!!
And what's the word?? Johannesburgh!!
No, actually the word is PARODY.
You know, this is getting quite interesting to me. At first I just thought you didn't quite grasp the concept of words actually having specific meanings, your 26 year old ph.d. notwithstanding. But now I'm thinking I might be wrong. Indulge me if you will...I'm being dead ass serious:
When you say "...which actually appens constantly in non-white supremacist fields of studies." <--- what are some examples?
When you say "non-white" do you mean "anti" or "other than" white?
What's a "post-colonial stand point"? How do you argue from it? Against it?
>
>"DUDE", the one thing i cant stand is when crakcers can't take
>a cracker being called a cracker, fuckin cracker, yes im
>racist.
Whoa, dude. Dude...slow down. It's okay, dude. What crackers are you mad at specifically dude? Dude, which cracker took umbrage to you calling a certain cracker cracker? We'll get em astralblak, we'll make that cracker dude pay.
Colour Purple if you read shit ever that had to do
>with anything Post-Colonial or in line with radical Black
>Studies,
That "post-colonial" thing I can't speak on, I really don't know what you're talking about, but all that radical black shit is fucking boring dude. It holds no interest for me. Except I think Marcus Garvey is vastly interesting and I liked The Autobiography of Malcolm X.
along with Amistad (Spielberg films) are the
>pontifications of white bread ass interpretations of Black
>life and struggle.
They should blacked that shit up huh? Or like how you like to shack that shit up?
>do the math dipshit,
okay
>jesus/christian morals
>explored
uh-huh
>abusive black male figures
say word
>nuturing or sympathetic
>white protagonist
talk about it
>"happy" endings...
hate em
>open your fuckin eyes
ya dig!!!
>those films are not only ideologically bad,
"ideologically bad"...man when you turn a phrase you turn a fucking phrase! But as "ideologically bad" (© astralblak the racist) as "they" are, lets focus on one...lets talk AMISTAD...
>but as works of
>art they needed editing
I'm pretty sure there were edits in Amistad.
>plot development
That happened too.
>and lacked any
>creative angles on the subject.
But they already got white bread assed!! What more do you want from them?
>Why not do a maroon community
>slavery/post-slavery film;
Yeah, why not? And why not have it set at a slavery/post slavery summer camp? Then the good slavery/post slavery maroons have to go up against the snobby, rich-kid slavery/post slavery maroons from the other slavery/post slavery summer camp because they find out the bad guys have bought out the good guys' summer camp and plan on closing it. Then there's a big slavery/post slavery dance-competition where they raise enough money to save the camp!!! Just think about it, astralblak...we could have all the good shit like edits, developments in the plot, and TONS of creative angles!! Man, this baby writes itself!!
>why not show black on white
>violence, rahter than the numbing white on black violence,
Uhhhhhh...the whole beginning...of Amistad...the slaves...kinda....nevermind.
>why
>not avoid the typical enlightning or revelations of the Black
>protagonist and create a strong Black female or male figure
>who organizes and resist white supremacist violence form the
>begining to the end of the film and yes their are many in
>history
Because it was about what actually happened on La Amistad. But we could totally take your idea, marry it to my slavery/post slavery summer camp idea, and see what kind of baby it makes.
>
>are you really serious about defending this mans filmography.
Seriously? Seriously, Steven Spielberg is one of the best directors ever.
>Minority Report, E.T., War of the Worlds and many many many
>other can be broke down into their simplisitic ass work on the
>viewers simpleton emotions, white Americana, State
>Survalience/Repression themes and narratives.
Okay, do so. And you can't just say they're "idealogically bad" because you already dropped that bomb on 'em.
>
>LOG OFF
If that's your way of saying "Seacrest Out!" then "Seacrest Out!" to you too.
Or is that supposed to be some sort of insult?
|
Printer-friendly copy 
Email this topic to a friend
Pass The Popcorn 
#/media/File:Firefly.png)
