|
>This is why I don't address you much anymore. You >consistently point out the obvious just to be contradictory >rather than come and sincerely explore the issue
Wtf? You're clearly too defensive.
I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to above, but suspect it has something to do with a response I gave in your modern policing thread. I put some time into that response, and the points I made - IMO - were valid. Other than my response it went wood, so if you can't handle a little well-spirited confrontation, then any of your future academic threads will be a very lonely place.
>With that said, yes, I posted this to garner support. Does >that make it a "stunt"? If you think so, then you watch far to >much television when you reduce attempts at garnering >solidarity to a self-serving stunt. Actually, I felt that my >confrontation with Fucktek highlighted several important >issues about deluded white people who think they are doing >issues of race a great service when, in fact, they are >behaving in bigotted manner in the process. Its sad, because I >actually liked the guy until he went all Jim Crow (oh no, not >another black struggle reference against white racism!!! >GASP!) on my right to voice my angst. But, of course moot, you >probably couldn't care less. Okay, very well, its a "stunt".
You're deluding yourself if you think you came across any differently to Bartek in your cute exchange.
|