>This is why I don't address you much anymore. You
>consistently point out the obvious just to be contradictory
>rather than come and sincerely explore the issue

Wtf? You're clearly too defensive.

I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to above, but suspect it has something to do with a response I gave in your modern policing thread. I put some time into that response, and the points I made - IMO - were valid. Other than my response it went wood, so if you can't handle a little well-spirited confrontation, then any of your future academic threads will be a very lonely place.

>With that said, yes, I posted this to garner support. Does
>that make it a "stunt"? If you think so, then you watch far to
>much television when you reduce attempts at garnering
>solidarity to a self-serving stunt. Actually, I felt that my
>confrontation with Fucktek highlighted several important
>issues about deluded white people who think they are doing
>issues of race a great service when, in fact, they are
>behaving in bigotted manner in the process. Its sad, because I
>actually liked the guy until he went all Jim Crow (oh no, not
>another black struggle reference against white racism!!!
>GASP!) on my right to voice my angst. But, of course moot, you
>probably couldn't care less. Okay, very well, its a "stunt".

You're deluding yourself if you think you came across any differently to Bartek in your cute exchange.