Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #15057

Subject: "I hear you...." This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
bluetiger
Charter member
36728 posts
Tue May-15-01 10:35 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
38. "I hear you...."
In response to In response to 35


  

          

>>which brings me back to this:
>>what rights can a fetus
>>possibly have?!?
>
>the right to live?

not necessarily.....I hold that its the parents' decision
>
>considering that the fetus/child had no
>part in the circumstances of
>it's birth (whatever they migh
>be), is it really okay
>to say "i'mma kill it
>because i want to"?
>
>at the very basic level this
>seems to be the question.

right....I think it is okay (but then again that's up to the parents)

>now where you go from there
>(should the mother be "forced"
>to carry this child against
>her will? does the father
>have any say so? will
>the wrong (killing the child)
>make the circumstances any better?)
>is where the water gets
>all muddy...

very muddy...I think the father should have *some* say so...the mother should not be forced against her will...and this ain't a perfect world so I don't think we are ain the position to apply our "perfect" answers/solutions

>back to "the basic level question",
>if you think SO --
>ive asked this before --
>where is the line where
>your rights/desires as a parent
>are outweighed by the "rights"
>of that child? why eliminate
>this line AFTER birth? what
>if, three months later you
>decide you shouldn't have to
>be "forced" to raise this
>kid, so you put him
>in a dumpster? or what
>happens when they turn 13
>and get all teenage-defiant, is
>it now cool to do
>that oh-not-so-funny bill cosby "i
>brought you in, i'mma take
>you out deal?

I think that viable right-to-life rights occur after birth & from then on....prior to birth-no-there is still a choice (IMO)

>if viability/self-sufficiency is the line then
>does THAT apply in all
>cases too? THAT's where i
>was taking the issue.....

agree with your taking issue....my take is just from the pre-birth standpoint....although there are instances where people have forcibly put the elderly & infirm in "homes" against their will...so that issue is definitely out there in the open




↑ yours

"unadulterated hate, so ugly" - binlahab

™ & ©

*May is Hate Prince Month at OKP*

don't be fkn evil.

  

Printer-friendly copy


Unborn Victims of Violence Act [View all] , SankofaII, Tue May-15-01 07:24 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
whats wrong with.......
May 15th 2001
1
they have tried this before
May 15th 2001
2
      RE: they have tried this before
May 15th 2001
3
           what about her rights to do so ?
May 15th 2001
4
                RE: what about her rights to do so ?
May 15th 2001
5
                is the fetus a person?
May 15th 2001
7
                     ?s
May 15th 2001
8
                     for grins
May 15th 2001
9
                          as a matter of fact
May 15th 2001
10
                          odd criteria indeed....
May 15th 2001
14
                               apples/oranges
May 15th 2001
23
                                    RE: apples/oranges
May 15th 2001
27
                                         perhaps
May 15th 2001
35
                                             
                          RE: for grins
May 15th 2001
12
                               think about that
May 15th 2001
13
                                    just trying
May 15th 2001
16
                briefly
May 15th 2001
6
                     not really...
May 15th 2001
11
                          no?
May 15th 2001
15
                               smoke & drink.....
May 15th 2001
17
                                    but that's not what i said
May 15th 2001
18
                                    I know....just clarifying 2/3rds of it.....
May 15th 2001
21
                                    partly correct
May 15th 2001
24
                                         so true
May 15th 2001
26
                                    agreed
May 15th 2001
19
                                    example(s)?
May 15th 2001
20
                                         example(s)?
May 15th 2001
22
                                    RE: smoke & drink.....
May 15th 2001
25
                                         who says?
May 15th 2001
28
                                              solution
May 15th 2001
29
                                              that's assault & battery
May 15th 2001
30
                                                   nah...
May 15th 2001
31
                                                   lol
May 15th 2001
32
                                                        huh?
May 15th 2001
37
                                                             clarifying:
May 15th 2001
39
                                              RE: who says?
May 15th 2001
33
                                                   what legal precendent?
May 15th 2001
34
                                                        RE: what legal precendent?
May 15th 2001
36
                                                             to reply....
May 15th 2001
40
                                                                  some fetus's do have rights:
May 17th 2001
42
as a pregnant woman
May 15th 2001
41

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #15057 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com