7. "OR, what i just said. as well." In response to In response to 6
is my point. i'm just stating the reasons why Joss is also a viable candidate (and thinking out loud in my first post). and i think in general it's naive to assume that just because the films lead is female that the directing job will automatically go to, or is more likely to go to, a female (not to state the obvious, but). i didn't disagree with Frank's sentiments on that. it's definitely a missed opportunity. ideally a whole lotta cool shit should happen but that's rarely the case. at least in this instance i can understand why Joss in particular would be chosen for a project like this (also why he was previously in talks to develop a Wonder Woman project a decade ago). this the kinda shit he does. would a film like this benefit from a female directors POV? fuck yes (im leaving out the PR angle cos thats the point i had a problem with). but if Joss is what we get instead, that's still cool with me and at least makes some sense. even a casual fan of the mans work would go "ahhh yeah, i get it" if they heard the news. i also think it's entirely possible to make this point without disparaging women or the feminist movement.
sooo...was that less knotty? or more? where we at right now on the knot scale?