Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #8992

Subject: "unrest in retrospect." This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
praverbs
Charter member
27156 posts
Mon Feb-25-02 10:56 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"unrest in retrospect."


  

          

it's been almost 10 years.

april 29th, '92, flo and norm met through a mutual friend: malcontent. the first two had been living admist each other as victims of displaced violence for years, waitin for the wild card third party to mediate their grievances.

florence and norman are relative insignificants, however. the two could've been 'ness and vernon, fig and gage, chester and vermont. the introductory agent is the key player in this case.

*

southcent has been angry. y'all know this, though. y'all know cuz and y'all know blood. y'all know niggas had attitudes. since 4/1992, y'all've known that southcent's hot temper literally gets escee heated (you should've recognized in 5/1965).

but y'all ain't understood why. maybe that's on us. perhaps killing the messenger would be justifiable homicide.

*

the 1992 riots were NOT random. those who paid attention to the pregnant silences between our well publicized expletives heard the shatter of the first thrown malotav cocktail years before it exploded against the walls of the l-i-q in dramatic irony.

the 1992 riots were NOT a three day temper tantrum. many (admittedly not all) of the buildings burned down were neighborhood nuisances: known ho tracks for pedigreed prostitutes and their equestrian pi's, licensed vendors of five glass doses of malted satan, and cia-approved setups for our contribution to the campaign of nicaraguan contras (aka the crack spots).
while this wasn't the most productive form of catharsis, southcentralites were reconciling some socioeconimic disparities the residents felt between themselves, the opressive overseers and the exploitative entrepreneurs.
there was an unstable solidarity in the air made manifest by the "yes we're open. and yes, we're black owned signs" that greeted patrons into store fronts.

*

the 1992 riots WERE necessary. contrary to belief, 51 people did not die because a lust to loot came across the residents. really ain't nothin to pillage outside of the pawn shops (which would be more like reposession) and the second hand department spots.
the lost angels were actuallly at a higher level of awareness at the time. crossing the color line was slightly safer as a result of gang truces.
the riots were an uprising (southcent is soweto). a reaction to a blatant reminder that we're are still seperate. still living under the code of isolates. aliens in the land of inalienable rights.

but in reaction lies the problem.

¿why never proaction?

¿why we always in need of a reminder?

¿when the epiphany reoccurs will we continue to voice our perturbation amonst ourselves? or are finally gon communicate (by any and all means necessary) wit our mute opposition?

*the preceding was just some reflective thoughts about an event that has left keloid scars on my homehood. take it as you may.*

-p'raverbs.

*****¡I AM! ¿ARE YOU?*****

"...there's one side of me that's totally for the preservation of black youth. ¿y'knowha'msayin? b'cause we're dyin at a rapid rate...i can't stand the ghetto. alotta rappers, y'know, they run around '¡yeah! ¡i'm ghetto!' ¿y'knowha'msayin? i live in the ghetto; the ghetto don't live in me. this is an ill situation. we have been put here for a cause."
-poor righteous teacher wise intelligent from "rhyme & reason".

okayp'raverbs. GIVING YOU TRUE TRUTH SINCE '82 TIL INFINITY.

« Slick Rick the Ruler in the Land of the Blind »

  

Printer-friendly copy


unrest in retrospect. [View all] , praverbs, Mon Feb-25-02 10:56 PM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
^
Feb 26th 2002
1
watch me up this until infinity.
Feb 26th 2002
3
      (im reading, just not much to say..) nm
Feb 26th 2002
6
           just trying to balance the perception...
Feb 26th 2002
7
                mh.. i can understand that/i feel what youre saying nm
Feb 26th 2002
8
                and this here is part of any revolution, isnt it..
Feb 26th 2002
9
                     that's what i see in the revolt...
Feb 26th 2002
10
                          from the opening of "the coup"
Feb 27th 2002
17
i'm really curious...
Feb 26th 2002
2
really curious.
Feb 28th 2002
25
this needs to be put to music.
Feb 26th 2002
4
Feb 26th 2002
5
korean grocers
Feb 26th 2002
11
black folk neither...
Feb 26th 2002
13
*stands and applauds*
Feb 26th 2002
12
thanks.
Feb 26th 2002
14
from the suburbs
Feb 27th 2002
15
it would make sense since latinos comprised 40-50% of southcent at the t...
Feb 27th 2002
16
      RE: it would make sense since latinos comprised 40-50% of southcent at t...
Feb 27th 2002
18
           that and the fact that 10 years ago the media acted like latinos ain't e...
Feb 27th 2002
19
           I think that's what I was getting at
Feb 27th 2002
20
                it was a southcent "thing"...
Feb 27th 2002
21
                i do appreciate your perspective though...
Feb 27th 2002
22
           Co-sign
Feb 27th 2002
23
^
Feb 28th 2002
24
RE: unrest in retrospect.
Feb 28th 2002
26
it was manipulation...
Feb 28th 2002
27
^
Mar 01st 2002
28
whites
thepreacher
Mar 01st 2002
29
      there were some...
Mar 01st 2002
30
           RE: there were some...
thepreacher
Mar 01st 2002
31
                i said nothin about rodney king...
Mar 01st 2002
32
                     RE: i said nothin about rodney king...
thepreacher
Mar 01st 2002
33
                          my bad.
Mar 01st 2002
34
I was in law school
Mar 01st 2002
35
RE: I was in law school
Mar 01st 2002
36
      RE: I was in law school
Mar 01st 2002
37
           RE: I was in law school
Mar 01st 2002
38
^
Mar 04th 2002
39
good post
Mar 10th 2002
40

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #8992 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com