>>I come here to debate because I'm bored. I know I'm right, >>and I know those on my side are right. > >So confident, arent we? Ahh, Rome was too. I hear they >turned out fine.
Different world, different power.
> When this is all said >>and done, it will be apparent to the world that we were in >>the right, and those on your side were severly mistaken. > >Who is "we"? You and your imaginary friend?
That's the best you could come up with?
>>You express the same view as France for Christ sake. The >>same France who turned their head when Hitler was building >>his evil regime in Germany. Like France, you are all about >>the United Nations, who since it's inception in 1945 has >>only backed up their resolutions by force twice, once in >>Korea, the other time in Iraq in 91. > > >You support this body >>who has Lybia as head of the Commission on Human Rights, and >>Iraq as head of the disarmament comittee. You support this >>body who has failed time and time again. Allowing genocide >>to take place in Yugolsavia, allowing 800,000 to be >>slaughtered in Rwanda. Then you say baseless bullshit like >>"Why rush to war", when the UN has thrown 15 resolutions at >>Iraq over the last 11 years, and Saddam has defied each and >>every one of them. > > >More assumptions... only I doubt they don't apply to the two >people you were addressing because I don't think either of >them give a damn about france, the UN or whether saddam is >disarmed or not. You dont know anyones specific opinions on >specific topics and instead make offbase assumptions built >off your perception of the narrowminded, "us vs. them" >mentality. How sad.
That's what it is. If you don't support disarming Saddam, for whatever reason, you are "them"
>Then you come with this "Unilateral" >>argument, when nothing about this campaign is unilateral. > >Only 4 nations specifically involved in military combat (all >of whom are western and very specific allies) and this ISNT >unilateral?
Look up the word in the dictionary.
>>Your whole anti-war "movement" is predicated on nonsense and >>anybody with a moderate intelligence level can see that. > >I guess most of the world, and not to mention 30-50% >americans have no intelligence.