>I'm refering to anybody who's against disarming Saddam >Hussein because the UN didn't approve of it.
I don't think anyone is against disarming a mad man. Rather, the majority of the world realizes that there are ways of doing it without resorting to war.
Overwhelming evidence suggests the inspections were working just fine.
What give the U.S. the right or moral authority to invade another country by force when it poses absolutely no threat whatsoever, to our safety?
The Rand (Paul or Ayn) philosophy, putting private property rights at the same level of human rights, equates the status of things with the status of human beings. If property is considered equal