|
>Surely not the victims family; : Definitely not.
they are usually the first in >line to ask for peace and wait for the findings. : Absolutely.
>Can't blame 'black leaders' Sharpton's busy running a tv show >and has been a small footnote as best compared to his activism >(or grandstanding) a year ago : I don't even have MSNBC anymore (cable bill too much). I haven't even thought about what he's up to.
>Sure, you can run a clip of a local saying, "The Police come >down here and fuck us black folks up", but its not as if he's >the one chosing those clips to play. : Yeah but I don't have a problem with him saying that either. Its not totally NOT racialized either. There's a huge racial component to the brutality.
>You can argue the left and various grassroots campaign like >#blacklivesmatter but its not as if Foxnews doesn't fabulously >play the glorious 'Its not about race' card around a narrative >about black fathers and black on black crime, lol. : Yeah, fuck Faux News. They basically just blame black ppl for everything. I can't even spend 3 seconds on that channel lol. The #blacklivesmatter thing is a mix. Black people have long been dehumanized, so specifying black lives matter makes a lot of sense. In some ways, it alienates cases of police brutality on white people, further perpetuates the idea that white folks have nothing to worry about.
But I haven't taken notes on who says what, but I'm really just referring to statements I read and hear from various remarks and conversations in the media and real life and on social media and in articles, that really paint this as a thing where its ONLY race-based. Like I said, I had to provide proof to one woman who was adament that cops never beat up or kill unarmed or innocent white people. My thing is, that takes it a step or two beyond truthful or beneficial.
>Basically we've come back to the point where we've gotta >tailor down two facts to make peopel understand? > >So as opposed to tackling the foxnews, sensational media, >etc...we are asking the grass roots organizations (who have >lots of white folks already involved mind you) to tailor their >message for mainstream america? : I think EVERYONE who speaks on something needs to be as truthful and accurate as they can. And none of us are beyond improving the clarity and accuracy of our voice. I'm not attacking anyone with this post. Nobody. I'm saying it would be helpful to the cause against police corruption and brutality if the range of victims and potential victims was displayed and wasn't artificially narrowed.
The culture in police departments all over the country needs a drastic reset. I'm just saying its important we see and express how wide-swweping the problem is, even while also acknowledging areas where its especially acute (Baltimore, black urban neighborhoods, etc)
|