80. "Really the one defense he could have is that she consented" In response to In response to 79
to the publication of the private facts of her abortion. Another defense would be that the disclosure of her abortion was newsworthy and there was a significant public interest/utility in knowing it - which of course there isn't.
She could certainly press charges and he'd likely have to settle for a considerable amount as it's really an egregious & illegal act of callous.
The speculation about whether the baby/twins were his is immaterial because there is no way to know for certain whether he actually was the father.