|
>That's all good and well. But none of that has any bearing >whatsoever on my thoughts and perception of the movie, and >what's I think is best for the franchise going forward- and >the Wachowskis ain't it.
>I disagree completely. This take takes the fans- supporters- >of said art entirely out of the equation. > >The second we engage a work of art, it becomes ours, >individually. > >Not in a copyright sense, but when I hear a song, watch a >movie, read a book, it's mine, and I get to react to it >however I react- up to and including saying what I think >should or shouldn't have been done. > >At that point, I decide what it deserves, not the artist.
Vs This:
>What I/you/they/we think should be, has no real bearing on >what the artist should decide to do with their art. > >Even if I said every artist must do exactly what their fans >say, that's ulimately benign, as I have no actual ability to >enforce that. > >It would still be nothing more than my subjective opinion on >their subjective art. > >That said, once an artist releases their work to the world, >that work is subject to the thoughts, perspectives, opinions, >interpretations, suggestions of every eye and ear that so much >as encounters an ad for that work.
It just feels like you're simultaneously saying your opinion does AND doesn't matter.
that you both should AND shouldn't have a say on what someone's art is.
d
"I don't speak to provoke. I speak because I think our time on Earth is short and each moment that we are not our truest selves, each moment we say what we do not mean because we imagine that is what somebody what's us to say, then we are wasting our time
|