>not in a literal sense...
>
>but the character Superman/Clark Kent is set for a particular
>period 1950s - 1960s.....
>
>the character has too many flaws to fit into a realistic new
>millenium world that the Dark Knight exist in...
>
>his costume, Lex Luthor, Lois Lane, his occupation as a mild
>mannered reporter is all outdated and in serious need to be
>modernized by comic book writers...
>
>any movie with Superman will suck because they are afraid of
>placing him in a setting that he could truly exist with a
>formable foe besides Lex Luthor, General Zod, or the evil
>incarnate of himself...
>
>thats why he should remain a cartoon character.....

Fun is the new gritty