396808, No...just. no n/t Posted by Brother_Afron, Sun Aug-24-08 11:45 AM
>not in a literal sense... > >but the character Superman/Clark Kent is set for a particular >period 1950s - 1960s..... > >the character has too many flaws to fit into a realistic new >millenium world that the Dark Knight exist in... > >his costume, Lex Luthor, Lois Lane, his occupation as a mild >mannered reporter is all outdated and in serious need to be >modernized by comic book writers... > >any movie with Superman will suck because they are afraid of >placing him in a setting that he could truly exist with a >formable foe besides Lex Luthor, General Zod, or the evil >incarnate of himself... > >thats why he should remain a cartoon character.....
|