>he's 100% wrong though..

I'm not.

>EVERY producer get's publishing...

No, they don't. You should know better. And you should know not to use apostrophes where they dont go, also.

>songs are split into writing and composition...

That's incorrect. Publishing royalties are split into two halves. The songwriter's share and the publisher's share. The songwriters get 50% and the publishers get 50% of publishing revenue. If the songwriter owns their own publishing then they would be entitled to both the songwriter and publisher share.

>50% & 50% ..so
>if you composed it you are getting publishing... how else do u
>think Kia Shine got 20% off Drake's Best i Ever Had? He made
>a beat that wayne rapped over.. when Drake used lyrics from
>that song he has to pay both composer and songwriter...

Because Kia Shine composed the music, he is the composer of the song, thus making him one of the songwriters. That's how he gets a cut of the publishing revenue. You got the term "songwriter" messed up and are using it incorrectly.

If the lyrics for Best I Ever Had get used in a book or film, all of the people who wrote the song get publishing royalties. Drake doesn't have to pay anybody. Publishing royalties come from the entities that pay to use the song.

Whoever taught you about publishing misinformed the shit out of you, bruh...I would check into that because they're probably fucking with your money...