Yes, I know that is the purpose of the GJand that the DA uses it as a tool to arrive at decisions he wantswhat I am pointing outis in this 1 casethe 1 that we have the GJ testimonywe see the DA using, as evidence, a statute that the supreme court has ruled unconstitutional(to point out that the valid statute was later introduced is very condescending)the fact that we don't have the testimony from EVERY GJand don't know how many times the DA has used evidence he KNOWS to be falseis what I'm talking aboutyou missed me with the rest of what you typed.
---------------------------------------------------------------If you can't understand it without an explanationyou can't understand it with an explanation