>superficial living is more than sex. women do what they think
>men find attractive (butt implants), men do the same (fancy
>cars)

but it is superficial isn't it? is that all we can hope for in terms of the way we socially communicate with one another? maybe i can't afford a fancy car, where does that leave me in the pecking order?

>people use sex to form connections no matter how fleeting or
>shallow, because emotions are difficult and erratic. also sex
>physically feels better than a physiological emotional bond

hmm. do you choose and hope to achieve perfect physicality over emotional control?

you're right of-course that emotions are difficult and erratic, but, i think that beast can be tamed. i think in many ways, emotions are programmed impulses we have trained ourselves to have. all these patterns can be changed and unlearned, we can gain full control on how we emotionally react to just about anything.



>>why do married men stray?
>
>marriages and the rest of life require a ton of energy, it can
>be difficult for a sex life to be strong. But if there's a
>side piece who only has one function, that answers your
>question
>

I'm not married so that's why I ask. Why can't the wife be the side piece? Is it because she doesn't have any energy either, or perhaps, maybe it has a bit to do with the constant social programming of getting as much ass as possible?


> have you ever looked at a
>>woman and wondered about her character
>
>no, that isnt how eyes work. we process what we see

I'm speaking about the way we process and why.

>
>nothing is destructive about visual attraction
>

All that glitters is not gold.