13. "RE: Pay attention to my answer" In response to In response to 12
My point is not that they cant show more quality shows- my point is the viewers give them no reason to put those shows on. The viewers that actually watch BET and write in- send in either favorable letters are letters that are so unreasonably demeaning that thre's no way to answer their needs.
As for their competetitors. If i have a business that makes 10 million but my competitor makes 50 million- that means Im struggling. Your point was that BET aint struggling- but thats only of you allow thier revenues to be viewed in and of themselves- but they dont exist in and of themselves; they must compete with people who make more money and can subsequently spend more money- you act as if competition doesnt matter- thats nonsense.
The 10 hours of good programming exists as an example of what BET has to offer- my point is, if you're not watching that ten hours- THATS WHY YOU"RE COMPLAINING. But before you can actually make something happen youll have to answer to your own complaints.
If you want to see more positive programming then why arent you watching it. let the people speak- let em tell quite clearly that all their watching is Rap City and Comic View and then you justify that.
Why else would someone persist to demand that BET be taken off the air- i dont even think you can support that idea- cuz its preposterous.
The point you're arguing is that we should change BET before we even validate our own complaints and thats just not practical.
Answer the question.
Are the people that want positive programming watching the 10 hours that are available currently?
You act as if its not much (and ill tell you again that that 10 hours represents a concise and daily fucntion of positive BET viewing- no reruns)- but if its not much then why arent people doing it?