Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #5026

Subject: "Pearle resignation & Reasons Why...." This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
LexM
Charter member
28342 posts
Fri Mar-28-03 03:06 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
47. "Pearle resignation & Reasons Why...."
In response to In response to 0


  

          

this just gets more & more surreal....

http://www.boston.com/dailynews/086/wash/Former_Pentagon_official_Richa:.shtml

http://www.ariannaonline.com/columns/files/032603.html

Former Pentagon Official Richard Perle resigns as Key Rumsfeld Adviser
By Robert Burns
Associated Press

Thursday 27 March 2003

WASHINGTON -- Richard Perle, a former Reagan administration Pentagon official, resigned Thursday as chairman of the Defense Policy Board that is a key advisory arm for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

In a brief written statement, Rumsfeld thanked Perle for his service and made no mention of why Perle resigned. He said he had asked Perle to remain as a member of the board.

''He has been an excellent chairman and has led the Defense Policy Board during an important time in our history,'' Rumsfeld said. ''I should add that I have known Richard Perle for many years and know him to be a man of integrity and honor.''

Perle was an assistant secretary of defense during the Reagan administration. He took the advisory board chairman's post early in Rumsfeld's tenure.

Perle became embroiled in a recent controversy stemming from a New Yorker magazine article that said he had lunch in January with controversial Saudi-born businessman Adnan Khashoggi and a Saudi industrialist.

The industrialist, Harb Saleh Zuhair, was interested in investing in a venture capital firm, Trireme Partners, of which Perle is a managing partner. Nothing ever came of the lunch in Marseilles; no investment was made. But the New Yorker story, written by Seymour M. Hersh, suggested that Perle, a longtime critic of the Saudi regime, was inappropriately mixing business and politics.

Perle called the report preposterous and ''monstrous.''

Perle, 61, was so strongly opposed to nuclear arms control agreements with the former Soviet Union during his days in the Reagan administration that he became known as ''the Prince of Darkness.''



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Having Your Souffle And Eating It Too
Arianna Huffington

Wednesday 26 March 2003

For years now, political reformers have been railing against the unseemly -- and rampant -- practice of former government officials pouring through Washington's golden revolving door only to return a short time later as well-paid lobbyists, auctioning off their access and influence.

Well, compared to the latest trend, turns out those were the good old days. Today's new breed of public servants prefers to cash in while still stalking the halls of power and deeply involved in the highest levels of creating public policy.

Talk about eating your cake and having it too.

On second thought, better make that "eating your soufflé," because Richard Perle -- a close advisor to Don Rumsfeld whose side obsession has been to open a chain of souffle restaurants -- has taken this double-dipping scam to a whole new level.

As chairman of the Pentagon's influential Defense Policy Board -- a position that is unpaid but still subject to government ethics rules -- Perle has been the frothing pit bull of the Bush administration's dogs of war. At the same time, he is the managing partner of Trireme Partners, a firm that specializes in homeland security and defense, and serves on the Board of Directors of Autonomy, a software company whose clients include the Defense and Homeland Security Departments.

Perle's latest deal finds him on the payroll of Global Crossing. The bankrupt telecommunications company is struggling to win government approval for its proposed sale to Asian investors. The Defense Department and the FBI are both opposed to the $250 million deal since it would place Global's fiber optic network -- which is used by the U.S. government -- under the control of Hutchison Whampoa, a Hong Kong firm with close ties to those freedom loving folks in Beijing.

Enter Richard Perle. Global is hoping he can convince his good buddies in the Defense Department to put their national security concerns aside and let the dicey deal go through. And Perle is clearly confident that he can deliver: In a highly unusual arrangement for a Washington gun-for-hire, he's agreed to make $600,000 of his $725,000 fee contingent on his bringing home the bacon.

I guess he figures: Hey, I convinced the president to toss aside 200 years of historical precedent and launch a preemptive war despite the trepidation of the majority of the world, how hard can it be to persuade a few government bureaucrats -- including my old pal Rummy -- to look the other way while I do an end-run around the public interest and bank a quick 725 grand? After all, you know what they say about casting Perles before swine.

This sleazy state of affairs has caught the eye -- and turned the stomach -- of Rep. John Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, who has called on the Defense Department to investigate whether Perle's business dealings constitute a conflict of interest.

During his years in the Reagan administration, Perle was dubbed the Prince of Darkness because of his hard-line stance on national security issues. But I suppose when you toss nearly three-quarters of a million dollars into the mix, the gloomy Prince is more than happy to click on his halogen nightlight and refashion his hard-line into a squiggle.

Adding insult to injury is the fact that Perle's windfall is coming from the coffers of a disgraced company that was among the worst of the corporate crooks. He's lining his pockets at the expense of the 10,000 laid-off Global employees who saw $32 million in severance pay wiped out -- and the shareholders who lost $57 billion in equity -- when the company declared bankruptcy.

The hubris is unfathomable. In legal documents drafted in connection with the proposed Global sale, Perle couldn't have been clearer about what the telecom company would be buying with its fat fee. "As chairman of the Defense Policy Board," declared Perle in an affidavit, "I have a unique perspective on and intimate knowledge of the national defense and security issues" likely to be raised by the governmental review of the sale. Knowledge, he pointedly pointed out, "that is not and could not be available" to the other lobbyists trying to get the deal approved.

In other words: "I've got Rumsfeld's ear and access to all sorts of super-top secret information that none of these other jokers on your payroll do. I know more. I can do more. So I'm worth more." And he had the unmitigated chutzpah to put this all in writing. And sign it. I guess this is what the Bush administration means by "transparency." And, to Perle’s credit, the whole thing is pretty transparent.

But, of course, when reporters began sniffing around the deal, Perle's power plumage shriveled up faster than George in the "shrinkage" episode of Seinfeld.

First he tried the classic Bush administration Plan A -- the simple, 180 degree lie. He just told reporters that he never signed the statement. That didn’t work, so onto Plan B -- claiming ignorance, admitting that he had signed it but insisting he hadn’t read it. Finally, no doubt realizing this all sounded a bit too much like "the dog ate my affidavit," Perle declared that none of it mattered anyway, since his position on the DPB actually, now that you mention it, had "nothing to do" with the Global deal -- so how could he possibly be using his public office for private gain?

So when there's money to be had, Perle's position at the Defense Policy Board affords him "a unique perspective" on advising Global Crossing, but when ethical questions are raised, his Defense Policy Board post has "nothing to do" with his work for the telecom company.

And this is the guy our president is putting his trust in when it comes to waging war on Iraq?

Perle's abuse of the public interest is in a class by itself, but he is far from the only one in Washington shaping public policy from the inside while skirting the ethics rules designed to keep people from cashing in on their positions of power.

Among the most prominent of the double-dippers are Karen Hughes, who continues to serve as one of the president's most trusted advisers while pulling in $15,000 a month as a "consultant" to the Republican National Committee; RNC Chairman Marc Racicot, a double-dip pioneer, who famously decided to forgo tradition after being elected party chairman in 2002 and hang on to his day job as a high-powered corporate lobbyist for companies such as Enron; and Haley Barbour, the former head of the RNC, who has unabashedly decided to continue working as a lobbyist for clients such as Citigroup, DamierChrysler, Lockheed Martin, and Nestle at the same time he is running for Governor of Mississippi.

It seems that after failing in their attempts to privatize social security, Republicans have decided to privatize public service.


~~~~
http://omidele.blogspot.com/
http://rahareiki.tumblr.com/
http://seatofbliss.blogspot.com/

  

Printer-friendly copy


iraq:developments & media concerns [View all] , guerilla_love, Mon Mar-24-03 03:41 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Iraqi casualties increasing.
Mar 24th 2003
1
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
2
RE: Reconstruction Of Iraq
Mar 24th 2003
3
RE: Reconstruction Of Iraq
Mar 24th 2003
17
financial benefits/blueprint for war
Mar 24th 2003
19
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
4
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
5
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
18
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 31st 2003
68
hehe yes
Mar 25th 2003
21
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
6
that's just the "initial phase"
Mar 24th 2003
8
      yeah
Mar 24th 2003
14
columnist fired for attending anti-war rally
Mar 24th 2003
7
media is misleading. critical analysis skills are neede
Mar 24th 2003
9
RE: But......
Mar 24th 2003
10
      I think
Mar 24th 2003
15
      he had them during the 1st gulf war and didn't use them
Mar 24th 2003
16
      Because planting them
Apr 04th 2003
82
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
11
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
12
psst
Mar 24th 2003
13
whores
Mar 24th 2003
20
Dolphins...Sgt.Flipper
Mar 25th 2003
22
funniest line...
Mar 25th 2003
23
      this is our tax money at work.
Mar 25th 2003
24
           click the link
Apr 04th 2003
83
Interesting Article..
Mar 26th 2003
25
moore (more) on the boos!
Mar 27th 2003
41
the onion: point counterpoint style
Mar 26th 2003
26
Halliburton Makes a Killing on Iraq Destruction
Mar 26th 2003
27
But they still get shafted!
Mar 31st 2003
67
Lockheeds $250 billion dollar Iraq connection...
Mar 26th 2003
28
Guernica was covered up for Powell?!
Mar 26th 2003
29
"Hackers" Down New Al-Jazeera English Website
Mar 26th 2003
30
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 26th 2003
31
The Big Lie
Mar 27th 2003
32
photographs of "liberation"
Mar 27th 2003
33
also check this
Mar 27th 2003
34
RE: photographs of "liberation"
Mar 27th 2003
38
RE: photographs of "liberation"
Mar 27th 2003
39
      RE: photographs of "liberation"
Mar 28th 2003
53
           RE: photographs of "liberation"
Mar 28th 2003
57
in addition
Mar 28th 2003
49
      thanks
Mar 28th 2003
50
           afghanistan is not much better
Mar 28th 2003
54
seems the war may have stopped
Mar 27th 2003
35
The revolution will not be televised-
Mar 27th 2003
36
Assasination of ITN News Team
Mar 27th 2003
37
Bush Slows Declassification of Documents
Mar 27th 2003
40
RE: Bush Slows Declassification of Documents
Mar 27th 2003
42
      yea i was thinking of adding 'again' to the title when
Mar 27th 2003
43
           RE: yea i was thinking of adding 'again' to the title w
Mar 27th 2003
44
The Perfect War
Mar 27th 2003
45
U.S. walks out on Iraq envoy's U.N. speech
Mar 27th 2003
46
a satirical response
Mar 28th 2003
48
this humanitarian aid stuff...
Mar 28th 2003
51
www.why-us.org
Mar 28th 2003
52
Am I the only one starting to get afraid?
Mar 28th 2003
55
RE: Am I the only one starting to get afraid?
Mar 28th 2003
56
      RE: Am I the only one starting to get afraid?
Mar 28th 2003
58
           The International Media Speaks
Mar 28th 2003
59
long term analysis
Mar 30th 2003
60
RE: long term analysis
Mar 30th 2003
61
      that'd be an interesting post
Mar 31st 2003
63
A Few Good Men
Mar 30th 2003
62
about those polls
Mar 31st 2003
64
article: Eliminating Truth: The Development Of War Prop
Mar 31st 2003
65
article: The uprising that wasn't, mythical chemical we
Mar 31st 2003
66
article: U.S. plans for post-war Iraq
Apr 01st 2003
69
RE: article: U.S. plans for post-war Iraq
Apr 01st 2003
70
Warner Bros. eliminates peace image from 'What a Girl W
Apr 01st 2003
71
US draws up secret plan to impose regime on Iraq
Apr 01st 2003
72
another article on clear channel
Apr 01st 2003
73
WELL I B SAMMED GOING IN FOR THE EXCEDRINE
Apr 01st 2003
74
Deal to Sell Water All Wet, Critics Charge
Apr 02nd 2003
75
HMMM SAME TOWN I WONDER
Apr 02nd 2003
76
Pentagon PA staff helping out embedded reporters
Apr 02nd 2003
77
Propaganda defensive
Apr 02nd 2003
78
Goggle weirdness -r edefiniton of protest slogan
Apr 03rd 2003
79
White House & the Media
Apr 04th 2003
80
iraq
Apr 04th 2003
81
      you simple
Apr 04th 2003
84
No sign of U.S. in Baghdad
Apr 05th 2003
85
article: Embedded Reporters & Access
Apr 05th 2003
86
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Apr 08th 2003
87
still no chem. weapons found yet
Apr 08th 2003
88
What's funny is that there was an
Apr 12th 2003
94
the begining of the end?
Apr 09th 2003
89
We have much bigger problems than Iraq...
Apr 09th 2003
90
another anti-war t-shirt mall arrest
Apr 09th 2003
91
'Hitler' execprod fired for comparing with US w/ German
Apr 10th 2003
92
y'all see this picture?
Apr 11th 2003
93
British embargo grounds Israel's nuclear capability
Apr 14th 2003
95
RE: British embargo grounds Israel's nuclear capability
Apr 15th 2003
96

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #5026 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com