Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #5026

Subject: "But they still get shafted!" This topic is locked.
Previous topic | Next topic
Battousai
Charter member
4386 posts
Mon Mar-31-03 08:14 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
67. "But they still get shafted!"
In response to In response to 27


          

Oh, the irony!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,926422,00.html

Halliburton misses $600m Iraq contract

Mark Tran
Monday March 31, 2003

Halliburton, the company once headed by the US vice-president, Dick Cheney, has failed to make the shortlist for an American government contract to rebuild Iraq, it emerged today.
Halliburton, an oil services company, was one of five companies invited by the US agency for international development (USAid) to bid for a $600m (£381m) contract to rebuild Iraq's basic infrastructure.

Only US companies were invited to bid, to the fury of British industrialists and unions, who pointed out that British troops are fighting alongside American soldiers.

The five companies also had close ties to the Bush administration, sparking accusations that the White House was returning favours for generous political campaign contributions.

Allegations of unduly cozy ties between the Bush administration and corporate benefactors has dogged the White House, going back to the scandal over Enron, the failed energy company.

Last week, Richard Perle, a leading US hawk, stepped down as chairman of the Defence Policy Board, a Pentagon advisory panel. His move followed allegations of a conflict of interest given his relationship with Global Crossing - a telecommunications firm that had sought his help in winning government approval for a deal with an Asian firm.

As for Halliburton, USAid has confirmed a Newsweek report that the company is not on the shortlist of two companies to rebuild Iraq's infrastructure. What is not clear is whether Halliburton's bid was uncompetitive or whether it was withdrawn because of unfavourable publicity.

A UN official told Newsweek that the bad publicity for Halliburton made the deal more trouble than it was worth, as the company depends on a lot of oil-related business in the Arab world, which is overwhelmingly against the war in Iraq.

"That kind of political interest was not in their corporate interests," the UN official said. The five US companies invited to bid for the infrastructure deal were Halliburton, Bechtel, Fluor, Parsons and Louis Berger.

Under the war budget request that President George Bush sent to Congress last week, USAid will receive $2.4bn for humanitarian as well as reconstruction aid.

Aside from the construction project, the agency has been soliciting bids on helping to restore Iraq's public health service, administering its airports, printing textbooks and training teachers.

The scale of the work has astonished experts who have examined the plans.

"We are embarking on a very aggressive effort, both figuratively and literally, at nation-building - far, far bigger than anything we have seen since the Marshall Plan," said Steven Kelman, a professor of public management at Harvard's John F Kennedy School of Government.

Rebuilding Iraq's infrastructure after war and years of sanctions will be a mammoth task and companies are eager to win contracts in an industry suffering from the global economic slowdown.

Some analysts estimate that the final bill for rebuilding and improving Iraq would be roughly equivalent to the operating budget of a US state with a comparable population. Texas, with 22 million people, has a budget of $57bn.

As construction companies position themselves for lucrative contracts, the rebuilding of Iraq has already emerged as a politically contentious issue. Tony Blair is at odds with the Bush administration on wanting the UN to take the lead role in running and reconstructing the country once the war ends. But administration hawks argue that the spoils of war should go to American companies as the US is bearing the brunt of the war effort.

In a possible foretaste of what is to come, the US and Britain clashed on who should rebuild the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr. USAid awarded a $4.8m to rebuild Iraq's only deep water port, which is under British military control, to an American company, Stevedoring Services of America.

Britain argued in favour of returning the port to local control to win Iraqi confidence.




--

Your San Francisco Giants: 4.26.2005 - 8.15.2005.

  

Printer-friendly copy


iraq:developments & media concerns [View all] , guerilla_love, Mon Mar-24-03 03:41 AM
 
Subject Author Message Date ID
Iraqi casualties increasing.
Mar 24th 2003
1
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
2
RE: Reconstruction Of Iraq
Mar 24th 2003
3
RE: Reconstruction Of Iraq
Mar 24th 2003
17
financial benefits/blueprint for war
Mar 24th 2003
19
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
4
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
5
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
18
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 31st 2003
68
hehe yes
Mar 25th 2003
21
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
6
that's just the "initial phase"
Mar 24th 2003
8
      yeah
Mar 24th 2003
14
columnist fired for attending anti-war rally
Mar 24th 2003
7
media is misleading. critical analysis skills are neede
Mar 24th 2003
9
RE: But......
Mar 24th 2003
10
      I think
Mar 24th 2003
15
      he had them during the 1st gulf war and didn't use them
Mar 24th 2003
16
      Because planting them
Apr 04th 2003
82
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
11
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 24th 2003
12
psst
Mar 24th 2003
13
whores
Mar 24th 2003
20
Dolphins...Sgt.Flipper
Mar 25th 2003
22
funniest line...
Mar 25th 2003
23
      this is our tax money at work.
Mar 25th 2003
24
           click the link
Apr 04th 2003
83
Interesting Article..
Mar 26th 2003
25
moore (more) on the boos!
Mar 27th 2003
41
the onion: point counterpoint style
Mar 26th 2003
26
Halliburton Makes a Killing on Iraq Destruction
Mar 26th 2003
27
Lockheeds $250 billion dollar Iraq connection...
Mar 26th 2003
28
Guernica was covered up for Powell?!
Mar 26th 2003
29
"Hackers" Down New Al-Jazeera English Website
Mar 26th 2003
30
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Mar 26th 2003
31
The Big Lie
Mar 27th 2003
32
photographs of "liberation"
Mar 27th 2003
33
also check this
Mar 27th 2003
34
RE: photographs of "liberation"
Mar 27th 2003
38
RE: photographs of "liberation"
Mar 27th 2003
39
      RE: photographs of "liberation"
Mar 28th 2003
53
           RE: photographs of "liberation"
Mar 28th 2003
57
in addition
Mar 28th 2003
49
      thanks
Mar 28th 2003
50
           afghanistan is not much better
Mar 28th 2003
54
seems the war may have stopped
Mar 27th 2003
35
The revolution will not be televised-
Mar 27th 2003
36
Assasination of ITN News Team
Mar 27th 2003
37
Bush Slows Declassification of Documents
Mar 27th 2003
40
RE: Bush Slows Declassification of Documents
Mar 27th 2003
42
      yea i was thinking of adding 'again' to the title when
Mar 27th 2003
43
           RE: yea i was thinking of adding 'again' to the title w
Mar 27th 2003
44
The Perfect War
Mar 27th 2003
45
U.S. walks out on Iraq envoy's U.N. speech
Mar 27th 2003
46
a satirical response
Mar 28th 2003
48
Pearle resignation & Reasons Why....
Mar 28th 2003
47
this humanitarian aid stuff...
Mar 28th 2003
51
www.why-us.org
Mar 28th 2003
52
Am I the only one starting to get afraid?
Mar 28th 2003
55
RE: Am I the only one starting to get afraid?
Mar 28th 2003
56
      RE: Am I the only one starting to get afraid?
Mar 28th 2003
58
           The International Media Speaks
Mar 28th 2003
59
long term analysis
Mar 30th 2003
60
RE: long term analysis
Mar 30th 2003
61
      that'd be an interesting post
Mar 31st 2003
63
A Few Good Men
Mar 30th 2003
62
about those polls
Mar 31st 2003
64
article: Eliminating Truth: The Development Of War Prop
Mar 31st 2003
65
article: The uprising that wasn't, mythical chemical we
Mar 31st 2003
66
article: U.S. plans for post-war Iraq
Apr 01st 2003
69
RE: article: U.S. plans for post-war Iraq
Apr 01st 2003
70
Warner Bros. eliminates peace image from 'What a Girl W
Apr 01st 2003
71
US draws up secret plan to impose regime on Iraq
Apr 01st 2003
72
another article on clear channel
Apr 01st 2003
73
WELL I B SAMMED GOING IN FOR THE EXCEDRINE
Apr 01st 2003
74
Deal to Sell Water All Wet, Critics Charge
Apr 02nd 2003
75
HMMM SAME TOWN I WONDER
Apr 02nd 2003
76
Pentagon PA staff helping out embedded reporters
Apr 02nd 2003
77
Propaganda defensive
Apr 02nd 2003
78
Goggle weirdness -r edefiniton of protest slogan
Apr 03rd 2003
79
White House & the Media
Apr 04th 2003
80
iraq
Apr 04th 2003
81
      you simple
Apr 04th 2003
84
No sign of U.S. in Baghdad
Apr 05th 2003
85
article: Embedded Reporters & Access
Apr 05th 2003
86
RE: iraq:developments & media concerns
Apr 08th 2003
87
still no chem. weapons found yet
Apr 08th 2003
88
What's funny is that there was an
Apr 12th 2003
94
the begining of the end?
Apr 09th 2003
89
We have much bigger problems than Iraq...
Apr 09th 2003
90
another anti-war t-shirt mall arrest
Apr 09th 2003
91
'Hitler' execprod fired for comparing with US w/ German
Apr 10th 2003
92
y'all see this picture?
Apr 11th 2003
93
British embargo grounds Israel's nuclear capability
Apr 14th 2003
95
RE: British embargo grounds Israel's nuclear capability
Apr 15th 2003
96

Lobby Okay Activist Archives topic #5026 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com