>http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=11&topic_id=279620&mesg_id=279620&listing_type=search#279655
>
>
>
>>You waged a 200 reply war against Apple on some DMZ shit. I
>>clearly know what I'm talking about.
>
>Oh word?
>
>So what about these posts:
>
>http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=11&topic_id=266716&mesg_id=266716&page=#275081
>
>http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=11&topic_id=266716&mesg_id=266716&page=#275095
>
>http://board.okayplayer.com/okp.php?az=show_topic&forum=11&topic_id=266716&mesg_id=266716&page=#275152

Look at every post you made in this thread after Apple's victory. You seem personally hurt by Apple's successful W. Your posts prove you a fanboy.

>
>
>>Samsung still owes Apple over $1 billion.
>
>On patents that have been preliminarily invalidated by the
>USPTO, from a jury that found Samsung was guilty of
>**willful** infringement.
>
>So yes, they will still likely have to pay fines, but no, it
>won't be $1 billion (nor triple damages, which is what you
>were so assured of in your post above).
>
>>Apple not receiving
>>more damages does not negate the original. It's rather
>>convenient how you post half assed articles that support
>your
>>talking point.
>
>Half assed article? It was reporting breaking news, not
>analysis.
Most of those articles are half-assed clickbait.

>
>Do you want analysis? You probably won't read these anyways
>(I know, the words can get kind of big), but here's some
>analysis:
>
>Noted Apple apologist:
>
>"Judge, unlike jury, finds Samsung's infringement of Apple's
>patents was not willful"
>
>http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/01/judge-overrules-jury-finds-samsungs.html
>
>Noted open source apologist:
>
>No to a new trial for Samsung, as she views the trial as fair.
>No to more money for Apple. They failed to prove they were
>undercompensated by the jury, she writes without conscious
>irony. And she has ruled that Samsung did not willfully
>infringe.
>
>Next stop, appeals court, where we will find out if they agree
>with Judge Koh that the trial was fair. Meanwhile, poor Apple
>will have to make do with a mere $1 billion as its jury award.
>We'll see if that stands on appeal too. A billion dollars for
>infringement that was officially not willful. Your US patent
>law at work. How do you like it?
>
>http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=2013013000132643
>
>
>

So Samsung STILL LOST and IS GUILTY AND OWES Apple $1 billion. Okay got it.