|
>with IT3, Zo, Kuz, BI, and Randle
You think Brawn, PG and whatever other aging friend is beating a GSW team currently in it's prime over the course of the two-three year window we'll most likely have?
Hey, if that happens, I'll take it. But it's not likely. Yay WCF, I guess.
>I think you're really underestimating Magic's competitive >nature
Cool
>They took over this mess
Yes, and they immediately improved on said mess.
>why would they hold onto a losing hand?
Losing hand? We've improved on our winning percentage two years in a row, in good strides at that. Skipping steps in a rebuild at a time when there's a stranglehold on that top spot is risky.
Boston, GS and OKC all built themselves organically, and that's the blueprint we should be following.
Calling the current roster a "losing hand" assumes no further significant growth from any player, and that's a foololish assumption.
>Bron is a FA, if he opts out > >you're worried about giving up any of the names listed above >to acquire Bron...which would make you a contender before the >ink is dry
Yes, for a couple of years, before he moves on, after having held our feet to the fire, demanding absurd contracts for moderately talented Klutch players.
It's a better long term strategy to build slowly, incrementally, so that we're hitting a stride with young players in teo to three years when GS is older and, hopefully, in a mortal state.
>not sure what is so coveted about the >LAL's roster today
Because it's not about "today", it's about building a team that's competitive long term instead of trying to hotshot our way into contending, likely for second place, while GS is on a tear.
If this were Brawn three-four years ago, or multiple players in their primes at the same time, yeah. You go for it. But going all in on a guy in his 16th season while GS is on god mode takes a risk of playing for second.
|