like, hit and runs
damn, and I was about to teach the children to cross the street...

/

our tomatoes ain't growing...

/

what's new since Friday?

>like, hit and runs
>damn, and I was about to teach the children to cross the
>street...
>
Charlotte drivers are THE worst.
>
>our tomatoes ain't growing...

its too damn hot.
>
>/
>
>what's new since Friday?
>
>
>
nadadamnthing

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

fucking douchebags w/ yellow plates behind the wheel... *almost* every last one of them.

back home, maybe once every few year there's a hit and run
round here... theres one every week

I'm scared to drive at night lol

plus the cops shooting...

and even when they do these fools walk in the street.

I almost hit at night a few eeks ago. The kid was walking in the street next to the sidewalk with headphones on.. and on the right side with his back to traffic.

I swear some of these people want to die.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

so imagine all these different driving mixed in with NC and SC drivers.

shit is scary as hell...

then you have to add in the slow ass illegal messican drivers and the drunk messican drivers on weekends.

shit is a mess

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

yours truly,
A NJ driver.

We don't hit people... they just didn't cross in time.

I got a good life man

https://memecrunch.com/meme/43BPW/new-jersey-drivers/image.png?w=400&c=1
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/de/b5/3a/deb53a54c6bc486c49cbcdb7076f2062.jpg
http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/e8/e86191f4f02c3347ef2812b59e5316f2524333ae47caaaa0409b34b72bff371c.jpg
https://memecrunch.com/meme/2W5WZ/nj-drivers/image.png?w=500&c=1
https://cdn.meme.am/instances/400x/34510353.jpg


Disclaimer: these are just jokes, man. Folks been kinda sensitive on the boards recently, so I gotta throw this in.

it seems way worse than where I'm from.
______________________________
http://i.imgur.com/Gj5Wy56.jpg

I'm still a BILLS fan tho 😜

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

And still a Dolphins fan

At least you're within earshot of a winning team in Charlotte.
______________________________
http://i.imgur.com/Gj5Wy56.jpg

Let there be a little rain or snow and they suddenly forget how to drive.

Still better than the NJ drivers that do 75+ during snowstorms.

for me to get it
what you're saying
your know what I means....

like today, I was listening to a married guy complain about marriage
talking about, "some days it's hard"

me, desiring to get married
have trouble believing that...

I told him just that...

he goes, what if they were a drunk
coupled with everything shi*

I got to think he just might be right...
still ain't scared tho...

bear with me..
or is it "bare"

Gen X baby!

lol

>for me to get it
>what you're saying
>your know what I means....
>
>like today, I was listening to a married guy complain about
>marriage
>talking about, "some days it's hard"
>
>me, desiring to get married
>have trouble believing that...
>
>I told him just that...
>
>he goes, what if they were a drunk
>coupled with everything shi*
>
>I got to think he just might be right...
>still ain't scared tho...

>
>bear with me..
>or is it "bare"
>
>Gen X baby!
>
>lol
>

you have trouble believing a married couple has hard days?

why would you not believe that or think you would be able to overcome life once you were married?

shit happens... you deal with it.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

folks make it seem like it's a death sentence...

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

_______________________________

))<>((
forever.

when I hear people say marriage is hardwork
I don't understand what it means.

like, the guy I was talking to gave the example of, "what if the spouse were a drunk". I won't deny that hardship; however, I'm thinking its an issue that existed beforehand. do people become drunks after they enter marriage? If so, why is that...

I guess for me, I can't imagine marrying someone whom I wasn't totally in love with. Where the thought of our commitment being "hard" would never crosses my mind. I'm dedicated to you, flaws and all...

my reality isn't everyone's

it sounds good tho

but once your husband shows his flaws and fucks up the money, cheats, lies, doesn't come home for 2 days or comes home drunk and breaking tables cause he lost all the money gambling..

keeping it cool/calm/collected is HARD WORK.

now you can definitely replace hard work with love, dedication, understanding, etc...

but it's the same damn thing...

you are just using different words to describe it.

didn't you just have an old flame thru? The feelings and emotion that you felt and how you handled it... that's HARD WORK!!!

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

and very well the reason I haven't married,
I'd rather not carry burdens into it...

>when I hear people say marriage is hardwork
>I don't understand what it means.


but then you realize she still breastfeeding and you dont want that similac bill so you chiiiiiilllllll

fuck nigga gonna take the pen and paper i gave our daughter to write with cause she said i wasn't supervising her and that she'd write on her clothes before school

i was like "biiiiiiittttttcccchhhh, i JUST had stepped in the kitchen to get my tea out the microwave and i could see her lil ass the whole got damnned time i was in the kitchen!!!"

but i just didn't even say shit and took my ass to work

it be shit like that, that be the hardest

****
pink toes: http://i.imgur.com/WN7DPL1

now, the first time I got angry but realized i was in my feelings, apologized and promised to do better.

a week later she hit me with the snarky "and clean up, i had to blah,blah, blah..is it really too hard to grab a broom"

i gave her a stfu look... i cleaned up 6 straight days and forgot once cause the baby was wildin and it slipped my mind once i changed her and got her ready for bed.

3 or 4 times a week she doesnt have time to clean up cause shit happens...

does a nigga remind her, point it out, get mad and tell her to use a gotdamn broom? nah... i just clean the shit up and KIM.

but since she is home during the day and i give her the last feeding after I get home from work I'm supposed to be on it every time.


and another thing... lol, she gets mad when i ask her where shit is but she is always rearranging shit. I aint got time to look all over the house when i can ask, she can answer and thats it.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

>a week later she hit me with the snarky "and clean up, i had
>to blah,blah, blah..is it really too hard to grab a broom"
>
>does a nigga remind her, point it out, get mad and tell her to
>use a gotdamn broom? nah... i just clean the shit up and KIM.
>



Nigga.
NIGGA
NIG
GAA
NIIIIIGGGAAAAAAAA


Do you really want me to go to church up un here
Do you really want me to go to CHURCH UP IN HEYANH?!?!!?

i don't know how many happy hours me and my boys done had dissecting this shit

****
pink toes: http://i.imgur.com/WN7DPL1

Who isn't a different as a 50 year old than they were 25 year old?

Successful marriage is largely about managing and accepting those changes. If you naturally make all the same changes at the same time as your partner then it might be easy, but it's a constant process and for many it requires work. Two people entirely in love in their 20s might find they have little in common in their 40s.

Assuming your partner will never change for the rest of their natural life is a *really* good way to end up hiring a divorce lawyer.

_______________________________

))<>((
forever.

as it is chiosing the wrong person
like I said, my issue is describing it as "hard"

about how many people get hit by cars and trains. it happens WAY more than it should. it's so strange.

how the fuck you flippong over on a 35 mph side street?

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

Combine lack of sidewalks, with lack of public lighting, weak urban density, and an overwhelming car culture and you're taking your life into your hands trying to walk in most jurisdictions. People have no sense of "pedestrians have the right of way" down here. I've almost got into fights and knocked off mirrors of people making turns against the light while I'm in the crosswalk.

Hell, in parts of the Atlanta metro, you can walk for a least a half a mile before you get to some semblance of a cross walk and even then, the lights aren't timed for people to get across the street safely with traffic converging in about 8 different directions.

Streets won't let me chill.

that "triangle" area for a few days.

Things to do/see/eat/avoid?
Thanks

Gantt https://www.ganttcenter.org/

if you have kids, Discovery Place: www.discoveryplace.org/

Hit up the Epicenter and Music Factory for bars, they also have a Comedy Zone and you might catch a good comedian sliding through.
epicentrenc.com
avidxchangemusicfactory.com/
https://www.cltcomedyzone.com/

Food, hit up Floyds for that real soul food.. it's kitchen style, not sexy at all but the portions are off the chain.
www.floydssoulfood.net/

If you like beer check out any of the 50 million breweries in Charlotte.

Hit up Sports Bar One
http://sportsoneclt.com/

Sydneys Martini Bar has live jazz most nights
http://sydneysmartiniandwinebar.com/

Uptown is small, walkable and pretty easy to navigate on foot.

If you are driving try to get to University area around the little lake, always a nice amount of people walking around and there are bars and restaurants around it.

Noda is small but that have a nice taco spot Cabo Taco and there are bars in that area as well.

If you like desserts and coffee you have to hit up Amelies
http://www.ameliesfrenchbakery.com/charlotte-noda

its open 24/7.. there is a hookah bar in the complex as well. It's right next to Noda.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

you ain't tell me none of that...

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

Duck's donuts

FOOD:

Mert's Heart and Soul - http://mertscharlotte.com/
Rooster's - https://roosterskitchen.com/locations/uptown-charlotte/
5 Church - http://www.5church.com/
QCBC - http://www.qcbeerandchili.com/


THINGS TO DO:

NASCAR Hall of Fame - http://www.nascarhall.com/ (actually a lot of fun)
Romare Bearden Park - 300 S. Church Street in the center of Uptown

Bottoms up....and the devil laughs..




http://soundcloud.com/rayandersonjr

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

If it’s a bunch of inconsiderate assholes walking through traffic with that “you ain’t gonna do shit about it either” attitude, well, sucks for them.

Maybe don’t be an asshole in the street with their little challenge and maybe they don’t get run over because sometimes they’ll come across an asshole with the benefit of a two ton death machine at their command and they kind of have the advantage there.

If it’s kids and old ladies and people in crosswalks, that’s horrible.

At any rate you can use this to your advantage. If your tomatoes aren’t growing, maybe you can fertilize the soil with the carcass of one of the dipshit Darwin awardees. Charlotte gets one less selfish asshole gumming up traffic, they get to be an organ donor many times over and you get delicious tomatoes!

Everyone wins!

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

I don’t feel sorry for inconsiderate people who walk through traffic. They only do it because they know most people aren’t willing to catch a case over it. Pedestrians rightly have the right of way but as with any right, abusing it might not work out so well.

Problem is… sometimes they’ll do that shit to someone who is just as much or more of an asshole and they’re not going to win a fight with the asshole with a car.

I really don’t see why you guys are so incredulous about that. If the scrawny runt in high school picks on some overgrown corn fed fucker named Moose and Moose whoops his ass, well… maybe don’t pick a fight with Moose.

I don't understand the problem with that.

If it's the bit about tomatoes, I don't see how anyone can see it as anything other than an obvious joke.

I get what you're saying...

>I get what you're saying...
>
>

yeah... it all makes sense now

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

**points and laughs**

i mean, cupcake... its hilarious, it just works.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

😔

.

...I'm from the era when A.I. was the answer, now they think ai is the answer - Marlon Craft

>I don’t feel sorry for inconsiderate people who walk
>through traffic. They only do it because they know most people
>aren’t willing to catch a case over it. Pedestrians rightly
>have the right of way but as with any right, abusing it might
>not work out so well.
>

no shit sherlock...what's that got to do with reveling in the fact that idiots are getting their much needed lives fucked up over minor inconveniences

this is akin to street harassers getting castrated and me exclaiming how awesome that place is...except even more tone deaf and ridiculous


>Problem is… sometimes they’ll do that shit to someone who
>is just as much or more of an asshole and they’re not going
>to win a fight with the asshole with a car.
>
>I really don’t see why you guys are so incredulous about
>that. If the scrawny runt in high school picks on some
>overgrown corn fed fucker named Moose and Moose whoops his
>ass, well… maybe don’t pick a fight with Moose.
>
>I don't understand the problem with that.
>
>If it's the bit about tomatoes, I don't see how anyone can see
>it as anything other than an obvious joke.


the fact that this is how you rationalize this is incredible to me...i have no patience for inconsiderate people nor morons and especially the overlapping group in that venn diagram...but this is extra as fuck dude

unfunny joke combined with an unhinged-sounding view of shitty pedestrians (which are as common as inconsiderate drivers btw) is so far beyond my own general disdain for the average person that i don't know whether to be disturbed or impressed

adding insult to injury...now i have to reconcile that i agree with legs on something...sheesh

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

>
>adding insult to injury...now i have to reconcile that i agree
>with legs on something...sheesh

http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/random-ness/images/3/3b/Now-wait-a-minute-o.gif/revision/latest?cb=20140118012404

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

Is Starbucks not enough for you?
Do you need a fake outrage fix too?

>no shit sherlock...what's that got to do with reveling in the
>fact that idiots are getting their much needed lives fucked up
>over minor inconveniences

Where’s the reveling?

>this is akin to street harassers getting castrated and me
>exclaiming how awesome that place is...except even more tone
>deaf and ridiculous

Uh… NO. That’s a terribly inaccurate analogy. For one, castration isn’t an obvious and direct consequence to street harassment. There’s no basic cause and effect there.

It’s more like a woman hitting a man because she knows social taboos prevent him from hitting her back… and you/me not really giving a fuck if she gets hit back.

That’s a quantum fucking leap from YEAH THAT’S AWESOME FUCK HER UP MAN!

It says so much about you that you actively choose to grossly overinflate my words to make your point.

You’ve repeatedly made the leap from “sucks for them” to “awesome! Celebrate, good times, COME ON!”


>the fact that this is how you rationalize this is incredible
>to me.

What am I “rationalizing” by pointing out very basic cause and effect?

>i have no patience for inconsiderate people nor morons
>and especially the overlapping group in that venn
>diagram...but this is extra as fuck dude

“sucks for them” is extra as fuck?
“I’m not losing sleep over an obvious consequence” is extra as fuck?

Do you just really need a good dose of outrage today?

>unfunny joke combined with an unhinged-sounding

“sucks for them” is an unhinged view?
“not losing sleep over it” is an unhinged view?

Jeebus, the criteria for “unhinged” is becoming a minefield. When did“sucks for them” become “awesome! let’s fucking party!”

>pedestrians (which are as common as inconsiderate drivers btw)
>is so far beyond my own general disdain for the average person
>that i don't know whether to be disturbed or impressed

To be fair you don’t even seem to know wha you’re so outraged about because you had to pull a madlib on my actual words to reach that wild ass conclusion.

>Is Starbucks not enough for you?
>Do you need a fake outrage fix too?
>


fuck u

>>no shit sherlock...what's that got to do with reveling in
>the
>>fact that idiots are getting their much needed lives fucked
>up
>>over minor inconveniences
>
>Where’s the reveling?
>

Right here asshat "Sounds like my kind of city"

>>this is akin to street harassers getting castrated and me
>>exclaiming how awesome that place is...except even more tone
>>deaf and ridiculous
>
>Uh… NO. That’s a terribly inaccurate analogy. For one,
>castration isn’t an obvious and direct consequence to street
>harassment. There’s no basic cause and effect there.
>
>It’s more like a woman hitting a man because she knows
>social taboos prevent him from hitting her back… and you/me
>not really giving a fuck if she gets hit back.
>
>That’s a quantum fucking leap from YEAH THAT’S AWESOME
>FUCK HER UP MAN!
>

you point out a flaw in my analogy using obvious hyperbole and introduce one even worse and then have the nerve to accuse me of "overinflating"

intellectually dishonest as fuck

see how i can give you credit for finding a flaw in my analogy, still insult you, and still be intellectually honest about how your analogy was even shittier...

castration was a better consequence bc it displayed how dire the consequences are to benign yet problematic behavior

but you do have a point...being an inconsiderate asshole has dire consequences when you are a pedestrian but cheerleading those consequences even jokingly as "Sounds like my kind of city" is disgusting

a better analogy would be if the male feminists beat the street harasser to death or severe injury i guess though still a bit of a stretch of the causal relationship (that causal relationship isn't major point of the analogy...it's the severity of the consequences)



>It says so much about you that you actively choose to grossly
>overinflate my words to make your point.
>
>You’ve repeatedly made the leap from “sucks for them” to
>“awesome! Celebrate, good times, COME ON!”
>
>
>>the fact that this is how you rationalize this is incredible
>>to me.
>

The fact that "Sounds like my kind of city" = "sucks for them" is absolutely rich for someone saying all the shit below


>What am I “rationalizing” by pointing out very basic cause
>and effect?
>
>>i have no patience for inconsiderate people nor morons
>>and especially the overlapping group in that venn
>>diagram...but this is extra as fuck dude
>
>“sucks for them” is extra as fuck?
>“I’m not losing sleep over an obvious consequence” is
>extra as fuck?
>
>Do you just really need a good dose of outrage today?
>
>>unfunny joke combined with an unhinged-sounding
>
>“sucks for them” is an unhinged view?
>“not losing sleep over it” is an unhinged view?
>
>Jeebus, the criteria for “unhinged” is becoming a
>minefield. When did“sucks for them” become “awesome!
>let’s fucking party!”
>
>>pedestrians (which are as common as inconsiderate drivers
>btw)
>>is so far beyond my own general disdain for the average
>person
>>that i don't know whether to be disturbed or impressed
>
>To be fair you don’t even seem to know wha you’re so
>outraged about because you had to pull a madlib on my actual
>words to reach that wild ass conclusion.

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

>you point out a flaw in my analogy using obvious hyperbole and
>introduce one even worse and then have the nerve to accuse me
>of "overinflating"

Your analogy didn't have *a* flaw. It WAS a flaw. All of it. Every word of it. It was nowhere close. Mine was much more in line with what I'm saying.

Getting hit by a car while walking slowly in the street is a direct and realistic consequence.

A weaker person hitting a stronger person and getting hit back is a direct and realistic consequence.

Hitting *on* someone and getting castrated is not a direct or realistic consequence.

>intellectually dishonest as fuck

LOL you equated this to castrating a man for hollering. That's not intellectually dishonest, it's just flat out fucking stupid. Your creepy need to be outraged seems to be blinding you to basic logic and reason. It was just plain fucking stupid. It's intellectually inept.

You're willing to accept that abject failure in logic because you need to sniff some outrage lines today.

>see how i can give you credit for finding a flaw in my
>analogy, still insult you, and still be intellectually honest
>about how your analogy was even shittier...

Well, no. You just said it was shittier. You still haven't articulated how it worse, while I articulated precisely why mine was appropriate and yours was way outside the realm of realism.

>castration was a better consequence bc it displayed how dire
>the consequences are to benign yet problematic behavior

LOL. no. It's not a *realistic* or even *reasonable* consequence for the *act*. You can be an asshole wandering the street on some WHAT? and get hit by a worse asshole *or* someone just not paying attention.

PLEASE explain how getting castrated is a remotely realistic consequence for hollering. When does that happen? How is that a natural consequence?

See, you're too intellectually fucking stupid to see how wildly off base that was. It doesn't play logically. It only works in your head because you're having an outsized emotional response. Rather than accept that your emotional reaction isn't supported AT ALL by anything I've said, you're doubling down.

Because you're addicted to outrage.

>but you do have a point...being an inconsiderate asshole has
>dire consequences when you are a pedestrian but cheerleading
>those consequences even jokingly as "Sounds like my kind of
>city" is disgusting

lol. So much fake, manufactured outrage. You really need that shit too. It's like food or something, caffeine, I dunno, maybe you're in recovery or some shit and needed a new fix. I don't really know why but it's fucking telling that you've focused exclusively on that header without considering EVERY OTHER WORD I'VE SAID that boils my stance down to "sucks for them, I'm not crying over it".

Because you're an outrage junkie.

>a better analogy would be if the male feminists beat the
>street harasser to death or severe injury i guess though still
>a bit of a stretch of the causal relationship (that causal
>relationship isn't major point of the analogy...it's the
>severity of the consequences)

>The fact that "Sounds like my kind of city" = "sucks for them"
>is absolutely rich for someone saying all the shit below

"sucks for them" comes after "sounds like my kind of city".... which puts "my kind of city" into context.

But hey, get your outrage fix for the day, junkie. You need it and I'm here to help.

the world revolves around u...

im an outrage addict despite showing for years i just hate idiocy and so against kneejerk bullshit...

anyone who notices how much of a full of shit narcissist you are is stalking you and following u and since that's not something you seem prepared to label me with...i'm an outrage addict lol

what's your reasoning for that again? oh, me calling you a shitty person who said something shitty...oh the rage...it's amazing i can still type...my fingers usually get sweaty and drip into the keyboard when i'm truly full of outrage

but luckily, i have backup sweat resistant ones just in case Cold Truth says something indefensible with shitty elaboration and shittier analogies than i can come up with on the fly?

shit, i think this keyboard is starting to have issues too...

please have the last word until i can properly spend time explaining that your analogy was in fact worse than mine bc my opinion is more important than yours and how "sucks for them" is more doubling down than contexutalizing "My type of city"...ARRGGHGHGHGG

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

>the world revolves around u...

Uh.. ok. That’s an interesting addition to the discussion, please expound.

Also… What does that have to do with the topic exactly?

>im an outrage addict despite showing for years i just hate
>idiocy and so against kneejerk bullshit...

In this post, yes. It’s a petty, sarcastic insult relevant to what we’re discussing.

>anyone who notices how much of a full of shit narcissist you
>are is stalking you and following u

Still lost on what this has to do with the subject.

At any rate, I’ve applied this to guys like legs who are, whether you or he wants to admit it or not, very consistent responders, far more than others.

I love how you like the part where other people “point out” what a “full of shit narcissist” I am, yet people very rarely respond when I break down the facts behind whatever their accusing me of. Like in this post: Legs completely refuses to engage on any of the nuances of the post. it’s just NOPE YOU SAID MY KIND OF CITY THE END ITS OVER!

He’s “this is the way it is because I said so! The end!”
I’m “this is the way it is and here are the reasons why based on what’s been said”.

He consistently likes to take things I say WAY out of context and NEVER acknowledge ANY fact that can downplay their position on me. This is illustrated perfectly in the way he- and you, here in this thread- play up “my kind of city” while you downplay “sucks for them”.

You have an agenda and an initial impression that you refuse to back down from regardless of the facts.

Still don’t what this has to do with your hilariously angry and wildly off base tirade.

>and since that's not
>something you seem prepared to label me with...i'm an outrage
>addict lol
>what's your reasoning for that again? oh, me calling you a
>shitty person who said something shitty...oh the rage...



I don’t label you with that because you don’t fit the bill. Legs does. There’s a difference.
And yes, you’re in here *to* be outraged. You actually WANT me to party over people getting mowed and , more to the point, you want me to want them mowed down, as opposed to the fucking TRUTH, which is that I just don’t’ give a fuck if and when they are.

So yeah, you’re heer to double down on your outrage. My reasoning is based on the fact that I said “my kind of city” and you trumpeted that as irrefutable proof that I’m partying over people getting run over. In the same post I said “sucks for them, it’s basic cause and effect” and that, well, that doesn’t matter to you because the first part caters to your outrage and validates your perception of me. Since “sucks to be them” doesn’t validate your outrage, you downplay it.

So yes, you’re actively choosing outrage when another reasonable option is clearly available.

Sounds like a junkie to me.

>I’m “this is the way it is and here are the reasons why
>based on what’s been said”.

you've done this poorly and continue to do so


>He consistently likes to take things I say WAY out of context
>and NEVER acknowledge ANY fact that can downplay their
>position on me. This is illustrated perfectly in the way he-
>and you, here in this thread- play up “my kind of city”
>while you downplay “sucks for them”.

this is bullshit...the reason it seems like people are dodging it is bc there is no way to convince u that "sucks for them" is only slighly less fucked up than "My kind of city"

This is like Bill O'Reilly saying something incendiary...backpedaling and then blaming the so-called outrage brigade for being upset at his not only shitty initial statement but also the shitty and ineffective "follow-up"

are you unfamiliar with how "sucks for them" really just sounds like a slightly more apathetic version of "My type of city?"

do you really sit here and pretend that's the case? is that how language works in your head?

That's the "You're irredeemably unattractive..." subject line "but i'd still hit on a drought, i guess" body type of post...

you wanna blame the outrage on the people that received the message that you poorly delivered fine...go ahead and do that

but not even once called out on how shitty the initial statement was...you double down by not acknowledging that the rest of the message not only did a shitty job of contextualizing...it actually was more in line with your original shitty shock title

making shock titles and then sarcastically calling people who find it wild, offensive, unhinged..."outraged" is awesome though

"sucks for them"

you the only person i know who would think following up with that minimizes a shitty stance...#bluelivesmatter..."sucks for them"

lol, i'm dying...i'm glad you don't actually find it gratifying that pedestrians get hurt and killed over small inconveniences but amused that you don't see how nothing you said in the body of the post (or more amazingly, since...) really counters that but hey...u got it


"I don’t feel sorry for inconsiderate people who walk through traffic. They only do it because they know most people aren’t willing to catch a case over it. Pedestrians rightly have the right of way but as with any right, abusing it might not work out so well."

I like how you seem to know exactly why they do it...and don't acknowledge that hitting them is still almost always avoidable

have you ever jaywalked?
have you ever made an ill-advised street crossing?
what about kids?
The mentally ill?

the person with the power should likely deal with inconsiderate assholes without hitting them with said vehicles...now if you want to stick to just situations where responsible able-minded humans intentionally earn darwinism awards...we can do that and it seems that what you're trying to do (poorly)...but to tunnel vision on that scenario when many hit and runs likely won't fit into that narrative is odd as fuck

Let me sport my Air Hyperbole 2010s in peace. (c) ansomble

Building repetoires (c) spm since 1983

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

Your best work has always been this "YEAH!! WHAT MY MANS SAID!!" weed carrier shit. Which is sad since you often do it with less than stellar posts. I already shredded that shit.

you asked for proof, I gave it and you been copping pleas ever since.

"I knew that was the line you would pluck out of the whole post"

lmao, if you knew it then you would have predicted it before hand. You types some dumb shit, got called on it and you been swinging at the air like Cuba Gooding Jr ever since....

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

because that's what you do.

Shit even your new bff called it "apathy" which is definitively not "joy".

And that’s exactly what you’re doing now: cherry picking a moment out of context and presenting it as though it summarizes the whole story.

That’s pretty much every interaction you ever have with me.
I also knew you’d be one of the few people to respond to that post after I made it.

I didn’t know you’d pick that line because I’m exceedingly clever, but because it was obvious.

You’re just that predictable. I say some shit and YOU will come running more often and more consistently than anyone else. You can deflect that with your cheap seat Rockwell cracks but you and I both know that’s just a fact.

of course you predicted what I would use as an example AFTER I used it. Thats not how it works, thats not how any of this works...

You have to predict it before or it makes you look like a liar.



CT: "Show me where I said XYZ"
Me: right here
CT: I knew you would pick that line... thats not fair, of course you ignored the rest even though I said those guys deserve to get hit and I have no sympathy for them because I'm a fucking psycho. Be a man and include the rest of it and use my morbid sense of humor while reading between the lines and understanding it was all jokes and hyperbole... even though I really fucking hate those dudes and fuck them if they get hit"

Smh..

I knew you would pluck that line... lol

The type of nigga who says he knew the lottery numbers after they came out and wants a cut of the winnings. FOH

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

>of course you predicted what I would use as an example AFTER
>I used it.

Well, no. I didn't predict it afterward, I just *told you* after. You really think you're not the most reliably clockwork troll around these parts but that's exactly what you are.

>Thats not how it works, thats not how any of this
>works...
>
>You have to predict it before or it makes you look like a
>liar.

I CLEARLY give a fuck how you perceive me.

At any rate I don't announce that you'll be among the first and most fervent responders anytime I'm in GD, yet I absolutely know that to be a stone cold fact every time out. It's not a prediction so much as a long established given.

>CT: "Show me where I said XYZ"
>Me: right here
>CT: I knew you would pick that line... thats not fair, of
>course you ignored the rest even though I said those guys
>deserve to get hit and I have no sympathy for them because I'm
>a fucking psycho. Be a man and include the rest of it and use
>my morbid sense of humor while reading between the lines and
>understanding it was all jokes and hyperbole... even though I
>really fucking hate those dudes and fuck them if they get
>hit"

more wild paraphrasing. it's as though the actual information available is insufficient to make your case. Here's another given:

Nearly every time I see a post where you spend any time writing more than one sentence, I know the bulk of it's going to be a fucking madlib. Again, I don't announce it but I know it's coming and I'm usually correct. I also point it out after the fact and every time you deny it. in this very post, you've responded more than anyone outside of your new make-out partner by a LOT. And that's usually the case no matter how much you deny it, Cupcake.

You don't want to believe you're a predictably persistent presence when I post, but you are exactly that.

>this is bullshit...the reason it seems like people are dodging
>it is bc there is no way to convince u that "sucks for them"
>is only slighly less fucked up than "My kind of city"

If that were the case you people wouldn't have needed so much paraphrasing. When you have to change the verbiage to make your point, you don't have a point.

>This is like Bill O'Reilly saying something
>incendiary...backpedaling and then blaming the so-called
>outrage brigade for being upset at his not only shitty initial
>statement but also the shitty and ineffective "follow-up"

Lol yet another analogy. You rely on them so much it makes it seem like your argument is insufficient to stand on its own. Curious.

>are you unfamiliar with how "sucks for them" really just
>sounds like a slightly more apathetic version of "My type of
>city?"

If that were sufficient to make your point you and your newfound frenemy wouldn't have needed to upgrade it to phrases like "celebrating death". Of course it's apathetic. That's the entire fucking point.

What do you think "not losing sleep" means?

It means I don't care.
It means indifference.
A complete lack of concern.

It means...FUCKING APATHY.

>do you really sit here and pretend that's the case? is that
>how language works in your head?

Lol. You said exactly what I said several times and now you're asking this bullshit?

>you wanna blame the outrage on the people that received the
>message that you poorly delivered fine...go ahead and do that

Funny, Trinity got it just fine.
My position was plainly stated and consistent throughout.

You had an emo ass reaction and don't want to walk it back.

>but not even once called out on how shitty the initial
>statement was...you double down by not acknowledging that the
>rest of the message not only did a shitty job of
>contextualizing...it actually was more in line with your
>original shitty shock title

It perfectly contextualized it. Just like my analogy was more apt than your wildly off base and overly sensational castration nonsense.

>you the only person i know who would think following up with
>that minimizes a shitty stance...#bluelivesmatter..."sucks for
>them"

Another weird conclusion with no foundation in anything real. Just wild flailing.

>lol, i'm dying...i'm glad you don't actually find it
>gratifying that pedestrians get hurt and killed over small
>inconveniences but amused that you don't see how nothing you
>said in the body of the post (or more amazingly, since...)
>really counters that but hey...u got it

Lol this is just plain false, considering my initial post expressed indifference and not gratification. It's odd how Trinity got it but the agenda driven outrage junkies are mystified.

>"I don’t feel sorry for inconsiderate people who walk
>through traffic. They only do it because they know most people
>aren’t willing to catch a case over it. Pedestrians rightly
>have the right of way but as with any right, abusing it might
>not work out so well."

>I like how you seem to know exactly why they do it...and don't
>acknowledge that hitting them is still almost always
>avoidable

Actually i said several times that most people are sensible enough not to run them over. So...yeah. Wrong again. Further, my initial statement- that you just quoted- said "abusing it might not work out so well". I'm clearly looking at the exceptions and not the rule so it's odd that you think you're scoring a point because I didn't also point out the rule. Especially since I still did, more than once I believe.

>have you ever jaywalked?
>have you ever made an ill-advised street crossing?
>what about kids?
>The mentally ill?

None of these things fit the bill of what I'm talking about, which again, makes your outrage that much more misplaced.

>the person with the power should likely deal with
>inconsiderate assholes without hitting them with said
>vehicles...

I've said this more than once. Most people are sensible enough not to run them over. Not sure what you think you're explaining here. I covered this.

now if you want to stick to just situations where
>responsible able-minded humans intentionally earn darwinism
>awards...we can do that and it seems that what you're trying
>to do (poorly)...but to tunnel vision on that scenario when
>many hit and runs likely won't fit into that narrative is odd
>as fuck

LMAO this is your crowning glory.

My initial post was crystal fucking clear that it WAS tunnel vision on that scenario. THATS WHAT THE FUCKING POST WAS ABOUT. One particular scenario. And yet, here you are bitching and raging away over my general apathy toward the extreme exception.

Great fucking job, junkie.