|
>I know you struggle with conversation but nobody is attacking >or straw-manning you, relax. But I'll indulge you just for a >moment.
I'm great at conversation.
I just don't let dishonest interlocutors slide- but I can see how you would see that as "emo" and "crashing out" and "struggling with conversation. Because you're a habitually dishonest person.
>Here's what you said: "It’s already a sea of “derrr just >think about it” and “do you think it’s just a >coincidence…” question begging stupidity out here" - >referring to "conspiracy minded buffoons" who are questioning >the veracity of this draft outcome. > >This clearly implies that you think they are "buffoons" for >entertaining the idea that the draft might be rigged.
No, that's me clearly addressing people who assert that it's rigged, not merely entertaining the notion. But again, you're disingenuous, and cannot understand the difference.
Worse, in no way is that me saying with any degree of certainty that it's not rigged.
The only thing you indulged here is your penchant for dishonesty.
Frankly, that's the charitable take here.
>My response was to say - let's not be so certain that they are >buffoons - because we actually don't really know whether the >draft is always on the up & up or not. > >That made you mad, apparently.
Wrong again. I'm far from angry, but I do get why you need to frame it that way. You can't conceive of anyone calling you out for our own disingenuous tact for any other reason, because you're incapable of admitting you're a bad faith actor- which you are in most discussions, with me or anyone else.
>Actually it is quite unfathomable to imagine Dallas winning >the draft with a 1.8% chance to win the lottery, jumping 10 >spots to grab the top pick - which is the biggest move by any >team in lottery history -
No, that's perfectly fathomable. Unfathomable would be winning the lottery despite not having an entry.
particularly in *this* context with >what happened with the Luka trade, *and* the facts about the >Mavs ownership team and its outsized influence in not just >sports, but politics and American power en masse.
That's a lot of question begging without a shred of actual evidence.
Shocker.
>To *not* >question this whatsoever exposes a lack of healthy skepticism >and intellectual curiosity.
There's questioning, there's speculating, and then there's "the fix is in!", and there's a lot of that.
One of those things is not like the other and you know it. But bad actors do what bad actors do, and you're a bad actor every time out.
>But fine, you are offended by the word "unfathomable" here
I love the gaslighting. Does that actually work, like, ever?
Mad, offended, see the pattern?
You cannot conceive of someone calling out your dishonesty for the simple fact that it's dishonest. You instinctively find fault in the one who identified it, rather than address the actual accuracy of the statement.
But that's what a habitual, compulsive liar does. It's natural.
Kind of scary, actually.
- >so we'll use another word: unprecedented - as this has never >happened before. Which is the reason why the Mavs execs were >out of their minds in disbelief and joy to get this gift.
Being unprecedented would be the least of any reasons to be excited.
It fixes, or at least masks, some serious problems. Literally every team would be ecstatic to win this lottery, but the fact that you had to go to
>Statistical anomaly that just happened to play out this way? >Maybe.
Statistical anomaly's are a thing. Funny thing about them, though:
So many love to point to some other machinations for them, refusing to accept them for what they are.
>But you choose to denigrate and attack anyone who >suggests otherwise as "conspiracy buffoons" - which says a lot >more about you than them.
Not suggests, but proclaims. See how you have this persistent need to reframe everything in a way favors your imagined version?
This isn't an opinion or matter of debate, it's a readily observable and consistently repeating fact. Psst: that's called evidence.
I based my conclusion here on actual evidence.
And yes, considering this country is being overrun and eaten alive from the inside by legions of conspiracy minded buffoons and purveyors of magical thinking, they are rightly denigrated and mocked.
>Upset? You shouldn't be.
Good thing I'm not. Pointing out your routine, natural dishonesty doesn't take an ounce of emotion. Just a modicum of critical thinking and an ability to recognize you for who and what you are. -Sig-
“Why didn’t you do this in your own god damn country?"
-All Stah's view on undocumented immigrants wanting to be treated like human beings.
|