Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Okay Sports topic #2713517

Subject: "NFL: New CBA approved through 2030" Previous topic | Next topic
will_5198
Charter member
60629 posts
Sun Mar-15-20 02:47 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"NFL: New CBA approved through 2030"


  

          

- 14 team playoffs in 2020
- 17 game schedule in 2021 (1 less preseason game)
- 1 franchise tag per team (no transition tag)
- fewer practices
- higher thresholds for THC testing and no resulting suspensions for positives

players barely passed, with a 1019-959 majority (51.5%). sadly, around 500 current players did not vote at all. can you imagine 20% of the owners not voting on their own labor agreement?

--------

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
players took a super L
Mar 15th 2020
1
Not at all
Mar 30th 2020
11
Will, i think i speak for all of us:
Mar 16th 2020
2
no time
Mar 16th 2020
8
17th game really fucks up the perfectness of the NFL schedule
Mar 16th 2020
3
yup
Mar 16th 2020
7
RE: NFL: New CBA approved through 2030
Mar 16th 2020
4
wild card weekend is gonna be something else
Mar 16th 2020
5
has anyone blamed jay z?
Mar 16th 2020
6
This is good from a fantasy football perspective
Mar 16th 2020
9
How do you figure?
Mar 17th 2020
10
Dude, the owners changed some stipulations in the CBA after
Mar 30th 2020
12

BrooklynWHAT
Member since Jun 15th 2007
78802 posts
Sun Mar-15-20 11:34 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "players took a super L"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

<--- Big Baller World Order

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
hip bopper
Member since Jun 22nd 2003
7273 posts
Mon Mar-30-20 11:28 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
11. "Not at all"
In response to Reply # 1


          

More games will result in more money for the players. The players can be better protected with less practices. The one franchise per team is a win for the players, which a majority will be QB’s (thinking out loud). Players can’t be suspended for weed anyone, and that is long overdue.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

HecticHavoc
Member since May 13th 2005
7362 posts
Mon Mar-16-20 10:40 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "Will, i think i speak for all of us:"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

where the fuck is your 2020 prospects draft class thread.

-----------------------------------------

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
will_5198
Charter member
60629 posts
Mon Mar-16-20 09:34 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
8. "no time"
In response to Reply # 2


  

          

draft season is on Twitter anyway

and with that, there's so much "my guy" and "first" that a lot of it becomes noise

--------

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Oak27
Member since Apr 17th 2005
12130 posts
Mon Mar-16-20 10:56 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "17th game really fucks up the perfectness of the NFL schedule"
In response to Reply # 0
Mon Mar-16-20 10:57 AM by Oak27

          

The current 16 game schedule
-Inter-division opponents twice (6 games)
-One other division in conf (rotating) (4 games)
-One other division in opposite conf (rotating) (4 games)
-Teams from other divisions in conf who finished at same seed (2 games)

Where does that 17th game come from? Does NFL just decide what games would make the best primetime games? Is it random? Rotated?

And now every team plays an uneven amount of home and away games? I'm assuming London/Mexico/etc games will now be "neutral" games, but we aren't having 16 of those games a year... or fuck, ARE WE??

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Ashy Achilles
Member since Sep 22nd 2005
3895 posts
Mon Mar-16-20 04:05 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
7. "yup"
In response to Reply # 3


          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

allStah
Member since Jun 21st 2014
1565 posts
Mon Mar-16-20 02:43 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "RE: NFL: New CBA approved through 2030"
In response to Reply # 0
Mon Mar-16-20 02:44 PM by allStah

          

Aren't they locked into that contract for 10 years?

And funny how the NFL's tv deals expires at the end of next year or soon. They will get a huge TV deal without that money being factored in.


  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

mista k5
Member since Feb 01st 2006
12206 posts
Mon Mar-16-20 03:20 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
5. "wild card weekend is gonna be something else"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

im hoping the playoffs wont be decided by whos healthy.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Reeq
Member since Mar 11th 2013
9035 posts
Mon Mar-16-20 03:58 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
6. "has anyone blamed jay z?"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

------

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

falafel stand pimpin
Member since Dec 26th 2006
4204 posts
Mon Mar-16-20 11:58 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. "This is good from a fantasy football perspective"
In response to Reply # 0


          

More teams in the playoff hunt. Less games that are meaningless.
Extra game.
More excitement around Christmas and New year's.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
legsdiamond
Member since May 05th 2011
64658 posts
Tue Mar-17-20 03:37 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
10. "How do you figure? "
In response to Reply # 9


          

I think it still balances out to a few meaningless games when the top seed clinches

and you may see teams jockey for position of the other seeds since the second seed isn’t as valuable anymore.

shut up already, damn

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

allStah
Member since Jun 21st 2014
1565 posts
Mon Mar-30-20 10:03 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
12. "Dude, the owners changed some stipulations in the CBA after"
In response to Reply # 0


          

players agreed to it, so that should invalidate the deal.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28972490/eric-reid-calls-probe-revote-post-ballot-changes-cba

"The letter from attorneys Ben Meiselas and Ray Genco highlights a difference in wording in the section about the league's disability plan that affects hundreds, and potentially thousands, of ex-players who applied for Social Security disability insurance payments before Jan. 1, 2015. In the version the players received and approved, those offsets applied only to players who applied after Jan. 1, 2015."

This is disgusting that the owners tried to pull a fast one over the players, and the NFLPA agreed to it. The new CBA, based on the new language, means that disabled ex players will get less money than the money they would have gotten under the CBA that the players agreed upon.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby Okay Sports topic #2713517 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com