I'm glad I can keep hating. What a fucking joke this guy is.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/20916366/cam-newton-carolina-panthers-mocks-female-reporter-media-session

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

seriously tho that was a boneheaded reply. it wasnt even an intricate question on 'routes' (not that women cant have a comprehensive knowledge of routes anyway).

dude just became black again like last week. he needs to tread lightly.

dude have you really not learned to not say shit like this?

clown shit.

...I'm from the era when A.I. was the answer, now they think ai is the answer - Marlon Craft

Like he answered the question and everything after. What the hell is wrong with him. Goofy dude...I can't stop laughing, but it shouldn't be funny

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

His list of hilariously bad quotables is LONG

<--- Big Baller World Order

.

...I'm from the era when A.I. was the answer, now they think ai is the answer - Marlon Craft

I hadn't even watched the video yet. SMH


This guy is just the worst in every aspect. A fake, corny, exterior with a vacuous smug interior.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/news/rob-gronkowski-lap-dance-fox-sports-julie-stewart-binks-jason-whitlock/tvl6clxlx6ig1pxxvcc8yb9yk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcWhuxnWvgs


Whiteness: "Oh, that's different"

^^^and that's exactly why we have the president we have.

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

Also very corny, arguably inappropriate (I'm not sure what this whole event is) and undeniably very awkward but what this gotta do with Cam?


She asked a football question and he mocked her. That's what we talking about.


I can't be out here scanning the web for everything anyone ever might have done that was lame. But thanks for providing another example even though it was not analogous.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

Wait…you also included a link to some random shit on a beach where an interviewer in a bikini asks Gronk what he's doing for Valentines Day and then winks at the camera…with this??


Go lie down nigga

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

a whole ass unsolicited lap dance and you still looking for a lifeline.

i ain't tripping off shit Cam did, because I falling for a whole ass conversation about respect for female sports reporters based off his comment. not with gronk RIGHT THERE to be the jump off point for that conversation. just no.

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

Situation one: Detailed football question in a locker room from a well-known local reporter after the game. Player openly mocks the idea that she should even be talking about football strategy.


Situation two: Shirtless Gronk on the beach is being interviewed by a woman in a bikini who asks him what his plans are for Valentines Day and winks at the camera. He stammers theatrically before saying "what are you doing" suggestively.



Those two situations are plainly different to anyone with a working brain.


And GTFOH with the "oh look over there" deflections. Nah. And "unsolicited"? She said "show me your Magic Mike" according to link you posted.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

You made a fool of yourself and have now abandoned rational argument for ad hominem…which frankly is wiser than continuing to act like you were making a salient point.

It's frankly embarrassing that you are trying to equate both of these clips to what happened in the Panthers locker room.


I'm not going to respond further, unless by some chance you come up with a better angle than this pathetic display.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

also y'all fuckin pieces of shit: "Oh, one of us fucked up? whatabout this other thing?" just like the white men you wish you were.

you disgust me.

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

...that only take place when a nigga as thrust to the fore as the face of a particular issue. seems y'all only sensitive about it when it comes to CRIME. then, niggas get real nuanced and wanna contextualize shit and become historians before settling on "well, the nigga shouldna shot the baby in the face. that was wrong, BUT..."

i'm just not playing that game no more. female sports reporters should have been respected when Naimath was lunching and when Gronk was grinding.

CAM fucked up, but this won't just be about CAM. that's my issue. it's gonna be about a mentality among ATHLETES (i.e. niggas)

you have fun tho.

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

cuz if it's an issue worth addressing, you address it. because it's important.

because people are watching and listening.


I don't have to hypothesize or head off some other hypothetical misuse of a particular issue, because I know what I'm discussing.


www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

It's pathetic, honestly.

If you don't have a real argument to make just go sit down.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

And if CAM gotta go down to get people to call out THE NEXT TIME I'm all for it.

But, WHEN Gronk don't get called out...then what?

And we both know it's coming. It ALWAYS does, hence the fucking "whatabout"

Keep the same intensity, nigga.

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

Oh wait, you're serious?

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

this whole movement is based on bitter chicks with an unearned, artificially amplified presence (social media) guilting idiots who don't know no better.

"y'all need to do better, while we get to be queens and not get called out on ANYTHING"

again...let ME know when bell, julianne, frances, etc. voice their support of this trash brand of intersectional feminism. kim crenshaw, the woman who coined the damn term, don't even agree with what bitter bamma broads and their ghoul-like simps have done with it.

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

around or a week.

Prolly gonna use it for the rest of 2017.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

And I happen to agree with you.

But Cam's transgression? We're talking second wave feminism there.

Some of the reaction is over-the-top. Men are typically more likely to know about 'routes'. But not to the extent that women should be excluded from talking about 'routes' all together. That's medieval shit.

It's the difference between equality of opportunity (righteous, right-on shit) and equality of outcome (social justice warrior bullshit). If a woman is interested in routes she should be included in discussion about routes.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

I hate how popular the term is becoming

------------------------------
For the record, my teams:
MLB: Mets / Soccer: PSG
NCAA BB: Arizona / NCAA FB: Michigan
NBA: Spurs / NFL: Jets

...I argued about how disrespectful "females" was on GD in, like, 1999 and getting blasted for it. It's not new or becoming more popular in recent days. It's been pervasive and annoying for a long time.

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

he tries really hard to be cool, which makes it cornier.

it's ultimately harmless (Peyton Manning and Tom Brady were/are dickheads to reporters all the time, but they just know how to play the media and their whiteness) but nothing about it is endearing, either.

--------

<---https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DL9AVTQ

He is definitely corny. But this is pretty straight up misogyny, I mean…what is he trying to say other than women can't or don't understand football's intricacies?


Admittedly, I can't stand the guy but kinda surprised people are defending this.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

<--- Big Baller World Order

I personally don’t care. He shouldn’t have said it. But what’s the story here, “Star athlete who is not the most eloquent to say the least handles a question from a woman reporter like a meathead”?

This nigga plays football for a living.

<---https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DL9AVTQ

When something doesn't affect someone personally (or really, the world in any significant way, as you pointed out he plays football for a living) it's understandable that they might not care.

What I don't understand is why they would bother posting in a way that suggests no one else SHOULD care.

Apparently mocking a female reporter for daring to talk about football at her job, in front of the world, isn't worth the keystrokes. And not only that, but people who call it out are "reaching"…but folks was in here posting about Kyrie saying the world is flat! And that shit prolly went plat.


So yeah, if you don't care you don't care but I do, clearly.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

than what Cam Newton said in a press conference.

You're reaching goes along with what are you intentions for being this upset about it.

Is Cam the reason now we should look at misogyny in sports?

Is Cam the reason now we should look at misogyny in media?

Is Cam a misogynist?

Oh wait, maybe Cam Newton and Jameis Winston should co-own misogyny among athletes because of Winston's pep talk to the school kids. We can throw him in there too.

You tell me. What's the goal here?

I think we all agree that Cam said something stupid. And guess what, Cam says stupid things frequently.

<---https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DL9AVTQ

Read the original post, what does it say?


Then ask yourself why you came in with all this other stuff?


It's noteworthy that there are all these overreactions and projections off this post. It's like when you mention something racist someone said and next thing white people are all rushing to create diversions.

The aim of the post was clear. I don't like Cam Newton. He did something baldly misogynistic and shitty. I stated that I am glad I don't like this guy because he keeps reinforcing that dislike every chance he gets. It's not complicated. There is nothing on the back of the piece of paper, you don't have to keep trying to turn it over.

The real question is; what is making you type all this other hypothetical shit, and why are you typing it since you care so little?

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

- So you lobbed this post out there and expected nobody to comment?

- I agreed with Will that Cam is corny, and added on that "mf's are gonna reach". That was mf's in general. And by you reaching with this and you taking offense shows that indeed you are one of the mf's that are reaching. But you're not alone. This shit was trending and a top news story yesterday. And I saw mf's reaching. So you're with that group.

- I responded back to you, because I didn't want to be included as someone who's defending Cam Newton's comments. And I hoped to clarify my previous comment.

-There are no diversions. It's pretty straight forward. Cam said something stupid. So? Now what?

-I'm typing, because you're responding. And for someone who only wanted to let it be known that they hate Cam Newton, you're doing a lot in addition than stating you hate him. I mean you covered that in the first sentence of the original post.

So.....

<---https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DL9AVTQ

By all means...

>- So you lobbed this post out there and expected nobody to
>comment?

What makes you think that? Of course I expected comments.

>
>- I agreed with Will that Cam is corny, and added on that
>"mf's are gonna reach". That was mf's in general. And by you
>reaching with this and you taking offense shows that indeed
>you are one of the mf's that are reaching.

Where is the reaching? Who took offense? I thought what you said about "I don't care why does this matter, what is peoples agenda" was reactionary and if directed at me, wrong.

If you think I am offended by you, you are way off. I think the substance of your comments was questionable and ill-thought out.

But you're not
>alone. This shit was trending and a top news story yesterday.
>And I saw mf's reaching. So you're with that group.

I don't have social media and don't know or particularly care about whatever "group" you are talking about. Everything I have to say on the subject, I said in this very thread.

>
>- I responded back to you, because I didn't want to be
>included as someone who's defending Cam Newton's comments. And
>I hoped to clarify my previous comment.

You have succeeded in the latter.


>
>-There are no diversions. It's pretty straight forward. Cam
>said something stupid. So? Now what?

People may agree with me that Cam Newton is an annoying dickhead cornball?

>
>-I'm typing, because you're responding. And for someone who
>only wanted to let it be known that they hate Cam Newton,
>you're doing a lot in addition than stating you hate him. I
>mean you covered that in the first sentence of the original
>post.
>

What else am I doing?

It wasn't until people came in with diversions that I defended my position that this is pretty indefensible. Normal message board shit.

Only one person is playing dumb here.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

>By all means...
>
>>- So you lobbed this post out there and expected nobody to
>>comment?
>
>What makes you think that? Of course I expected comments.
>
>>
>>- I agreed with Will that Cam is corny, and added on that
>>"mf's are gonna reach". That was mf's in general. And by you
>>reaching with this and you taking offense shows that indeed
>>you are one of the mf's that are reaching.
>
>Where is the reaching? Who took offense? I thought what you
>said about "I don't care why does this matter, what is peoples
>agenda" was reactionary and if directed at me, wrong.

People are reaching left and right with Cam's comments. Cam just lost a sponsorship, because of these comments. My comments were reactionary to what? What is actually going on? Sorry fam, your post doesn't exist in a vacuum. There's an entire conversation going on in the news media, offline/irl, on social media. You can't throw this out there and hide your hands.

Just like I can't say, "I really like Donald Trump's follow through when he jumpshots paper towels into a crowd." And not expect that to lead to other shit.


>If you think I am offended by you, you are way off. I think
>the substance of your comments was questionable and
>ill-thought out.

Seems like you're the one that didn't thinks this through. If we're gonna operate on the premise that you're still playing dumb.


>But you're not
>>alone. This shit was trending and a top news story
>yesterday.
>>And I saw mf's reaching. So you're with that group.
>
>I don't have social media and don't know or particularly care
>about whatever "group" you are talking about. Everything I
>have to say on the subject, I said in this very thread.
>

Yeah man, we get it. You have no idea what's going on. You're just in a room staring at a Cam Newton fathead poking holes in it.

We get it.


>>
>>- I responded back to you, because I didn't want to be
>>included as someone who's defending Cam Newton's comments.
>And
>>I hoped to clarify my previous comment.
>
>You have succeeded in the latter.
>
>
>>
>>-There are no diversions. It's pretty straight forward. Cam
>>said something stupid. So? Now what?
>
>People may agree with me that Cam Newton is an annoying
>dickhead cornball?

Word? Because most people have agreed. Including me, but yet you're still going.

Ask yourself why?

>>
>>-I'm typing, because you're responding. And for someone who
>>only wanted to let it be known that they hate Cam Newton,
>>you're doing a lot in addition than stating you hate him. I
>>mean you covered that in the first sentence of the original
>>post.
>>
>
>What else am I doing?
>
>It wasn't until people came in with diversions that I defended
>my position that this is pretty indefensible. Normal message
>board shit.
>
>Only one person is playing dumb here.
>

Still, no diversions. But you're mad about something. You're literally defending something that most people here agreed with. Cam is a cornball.

Are you picking any of this up yet?

<---https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DL9AVTQ

>>By all means...
>>
>>>- So you lobbed this post out there and expected nobody to
>>>comment?
>>
>>What makes you think that? Of course I expected comments.
>>
>>>
>>>- I agreed with Will that Cam is corny, and added on that
>>>"mf's are gonna reach". That was mf's in general. And by
>you
>>>reaching with this and you taking offense shows that indeed
>>>you are one of the mf's that are reaching.
>>
>>Where is the reaching? Who took offense? I thought what you
>>said about "I don't care why does this matter, what is
>peoples
>>agenda" was reactionary and if directed at me, wrong.
>
>People are reaching left and right with Cam's comments. Cam
>just lost a sponsorship, because of these comments. My
>comments were reactionary to what? What is actually going on?
>Sorry fam, your post doesn't exist in a vacuum. There's an
>entire conversation going on in the news media, offline/irl,
>on social media. You can't throw this out there and hide your
>hands.

You posted "mfers are reaching" and I ignored it. Then when I replied to SOMEONE ELSE you came in saying oh, MOST don't care, what is the big scoop here blah blah

So you came to me twice, looking to have THIS discussion. I didn't come hunting down your innocuous post.

Additionally, I posted right after it happened, so stop with the nonsense. People want to talk about what's happened since then, by all means. I'll happily chop it up about Cam's lost sponsorships, but we can't make that into the original intent of the post because nobody has a time machine.

If anyone's asking though, I don't really care if he lost a sponsorship. Certainly no more than you care about this entire incident.

>
>Just like I can't say, "I really like Donald Trump's follow
>through when he jumpshots paper towels into a crowd." And not
>expect that to lead to other shit.

Anyone wants to ask where I stand in whatever particular culture war is going on in your twitter feed, feel free. This post was about Cam being a misogynist dickhead. If you want to talk about some other shit, we can.

>
>
>>If you think I am offended by you, you are way off. I think
>>the substance of your comments was questionable and
>>ill-thought out.
>
>Seems like you're the one that didn't thinks this through. If
>we're gonna operate on the premise that you're still playing
>dumb.
>
>
>>But you're not
>>>alone. This shit was trending and a top news story
>>yesterday.
>>>And I saw mf's reaching. So you're with that group.
>>
>>I don't have social media and don't know or particularly
>care
>>about whatever "group" you are talking about. Everything I
>>have to say on the subject, I said in this very thread.
>>
>
>Yeah man, we get it. You have no idea what's going on. You're
>just in a room staring at a Cam Newton fathead poking holes in
>it.
>
>We get it.

Those are the only two options?

>
>
>>>
>>>- I responded back to you, because I didn't want to be
>>>included as someone who's defending Cam Newton's comments.
>>And
>>>I hoped to clarify my previous comment.
>>
>>You have succeeded in the latter.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>-There are no diversions. It's pretty straight forward. Cam
>>>said something stupid. So? Now what?
>>
>>People may agree with me that Cam Newton is an annoying
>>dickhead cornball?
>
>Word? Because most people have agreed. Including me, but yet
>you're still going.
>
>Ask yourself why?

Because I was engaging in a dialogue with you, however contentious? Because I was defending the post against people's statements, yours among them? But it does appear we are done here. My intent of the post is clear, as is your opinion of it. Both of our thoughts about Cam Newton's current pot of hot water are as well.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

>>>By all means...
>>>
>>>>- So you lobbed this post out there and expected nobody to
>>>>comment?
>>>
>>>What makes you think that? Of course I expected comments.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>- I agreed with Will that Cam is corny, and added on that
>>>>"mf's are gonna reach". That was mf's in general. And by
>>you
>>>>reaching with this and you taking offense shows that
>indeed
>>>>you are one of the mf's that are reaching.
>>>
>>>Where is the reaching? Who took offense? I thought what you
>>>said about "I don't care why does this matter, what is
>>peoples
>>>agenda" was reactionary and if directed at me, wrong.
>>
>>People are reaching left and right with Cam's comments. Cam
>>just lost a sponsorship, because of these comments. My
>>comments were reactionary to what? What is actually going
>on?
>>Sorry fam, your post doesn't exist in a vacuum. There's an
>>entire conversation going on in the news media, offline/irl,
>>on social media. You can't throw this out there and hide
>your
>>hands.
>
>You posted "mfers are reaching" and I ignored it. Then when I
>replied to SOMEONE ELSE you came in saying oh, MOST don't
>care, what is the big scoop here blah blah

Lol... you so mad right now that you're not making a lick of sense. And we're literally talking in circles.

I already told you why I replied to you. But you're still playing dumb. Like I wanted to get into a long ass drawn out conversation with you or this topic.


>So you came to me twice, looking to have THIS discussion. I
>didn't come hunting down your innocuous post.
>

Fam, you're not this dense. Nobody came at you twice. I didn't come at you the first time and clarified the second time. You took offense. That's your fault. Stop playing a victim.

>Additionally, I posted right after it happened, so stop with
>the nonsense. People want to talk about what's happened since
>then, by all means. I'll happily chop it up about Cam's lost
>sponsorships, but we can't make that into the original intent
>of the post because nobody has a time machine.
>

Again... everything that's going on in this post isn't directed right at you. What don't you get? If something written in the post is applicable to you, than sure. Get mad. I don't give a fuck.

You posted about a topic and expected that topic not to have a life of its own? You posted it because you thought it was controversial. But you expected the controversy to end at, "Cam is lame."

FOH.


> If anyone's asking though, I don't really care if he lost a
>sponsorship. Certainly no more than you care about this entire
>incident.
>
>>
>>Just like I can't say, "I really like Donald Trump's follow
>>through when he jumpshots paper towels into a crowd." And
>not
>>expect that to lead to other shit.
>
>Anyone wants to ask where I stand in whatever particular
>culture war is going on in your twitter feed, feel free. This
>post was about Cam being a misogynist dickhead. If you want to
>talk about some other shit, we can.
>

Still... we don't have to talk about anything. If you wanted it to be known you hate Cam and he said something stupid, nobody is disagreeing with you. Hate Cam all you want. Yes, he said something stupid.

But you want more though...that's why you're still going.

>>
>>>If you think I am offended by you, you are way off. I think
>>>the substance of your comments was questionable and
>>>ill-thought out.
>>
>>Seems like you're the one that didn't thinks this through.
>If
>>we're gonna operate on the premise that you're still playing
>>dumb.
>>
>>
>>>But you're not
>>>>alone. This shit was trending and a top news story
>>>yesterday.
>>>>And I saw mf's reaching. So you're with that group.
>>>
>>>I don't have social media and don't know or particularly
>>care
>>>about whatever "group" you are talking about. Everything I
>>>have to say on the subject, I said in this very thread.
>>>
>>
>>Yeah man, we get it. You have no idea what's going on.
>You're
>>just in a room staring at a Cam Newton fathead poking holes
>in
>>it.
>>
>>We get it.
>
>Those are the only two options?
>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>- I responded back to you, because I didn't want to be
>>>>included as someone who's defending Cam Newton's comments.
>>>And
>>>>I hoped to clarify my previous comment.
>>>
>>>You have succeeded in the latter.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>-There are no diversions. It's pretty straight forward.
>Cam
>>>>said something stupid. So? Now what?
>>>
>>>People may agree with me that Cam Newton is an annoying
>>>dickhead cornball?
>>
>>Word? Because most people have agreed. Including me, but yet
>>you're still going.
>>
>>Ask yourself why?
>
>Because I was engaging in a dialogue with you, however
>contentious? Because I was defending the post against people's
>statements, yours among them? But it does appear we are done
>here. My intent of the post is clear, as is your opinion of
>it. Both of our thoughts about Cam Newton's current pot of hot
>water are as well.

You could've just said you misunderstood and kept the rest of this to yourself. And saved us both a lot of keystrokes.

<---https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01DL9AVTQ

Nobody misunderstood. On the contrary, I think we understand each other quite clearly

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

He was lunching on this tho..

If I was his agent I would blame it on the pain meds just kicking in before the interview.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

or 'disrespecting women' or whatever term we should use.

His premise is that women don't understand football. It's not some innocent "oh I'm surprised b/c I don't usually talk to women about football". (which is bad too, but someone could try to split hairs)

People caping hard but also spending umpteen posts claiming they not. It's weird. He straight up told her nah, women can't talk about football and laughed in her face.


Pretty humiliating, if that's your job and you are the one being clowned in front of colleagues and other people whose respect you have worked hard to try and earn.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

and that's where it ends for me. i'm not willing to have the larger conversation about the treatment of female sports media professionals with cam's transgression as the jumping off point. absolutely not, not when people laughed off gronk putting his whole ass groin in that woman's face, unsolicited.

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

When you came in with your links, you replied to the original post, which me frying Cam. I don't see shit in there about this "wider discussion" you are retroactively making into the point of this post. If you had just said "dumb comment, he should be fried" wouldn't be no larger discussion happening because no one thinks Cam Newton is the only misogynist in football.


Also, just so we stick to facts out here; according to YOUR links the lapdance actually WAS solicited, so I dunno why you keep saying that. But I am fine with frying Gronk if you find something worth heating the oil for, which considering his antics, shouldn't be hard.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

he thrusted in her face. we don't agree. bye.


edit: i will concede that my "gronk" reply wasn't even directed at you. it was about where the conversation was headed, based on what i'd been reading on twitter, which is "black men can't get right"...so i did a poor job of putting my argument in context to start. my bad.

other than that, we can just not agree.

____________________________________________________


Steph: I was just fooling about

Kyrie: I wasn't.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8OWNspU_yE

The link you posted (and the opening actions of the video support this) says the woman said "Show me your Magic Mike" or somesuch.


As far as the rest, I concede that I don't have social media, so I have no idea what is happening in any wider discussion. And if that's what people are saying, I agree that that is asinine.

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

> it was about where the conversation was headed, based on what i'd been reading on twitter, which is "black men can't get right"...so i did a poor job of putting my argument in context to start. my bad.

This happens alot on here. Someone might be talking about 'A' here but off the boards its going to "b", "c" and beyond. but just bc someone here has "A' point of view, doesn't mean they are taking it to all those other places. Props for recognizing it. Alot of folks just double down when it happens. Makes meaningful convos impossible.

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<---- 5....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dlgiritpmfo

=======================================

ain't no women ANYWHERE in a football locker room, or film room or office.
He's def goofy and wrong as hell, but it ain't that big of a deal, IMO

and sounded like Cam does when he is trying to sound intelligent in post game interviews.

He def should have more empathy given his terrible answers in previous interviews.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

that Cam strikes him as that dude that we all know, who can only communicate with women by flirting with them. I legit LOL'ed, because I definitely know a dude like that.

...I'm from the era when A.I. was the answer, now they think ai is the answer - Marlon Craft

>ain't no women ANYWHERE in a football locker room,

What year is this?

------

12 play and 12 planets are enlighten for all the Aliens to Party and free those on the Sex Planet-maxxx

XBL: trkc21
Twitter: @tyrcasey

the coaches and players are all men.
On a film day/game planning day? You ain't seeing women anywhere, let alone a women talking to you about football theory, ASIDE from the press
Not excusing what he said, but I can see how that brain fart could happen.

it's not like she just showed up today.

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

Both these unfunny dinguses can fuck all the way off.

______________________________

"Walleye, a lot of things are going to go wrong in your life that technically aren't your fault. Always remember that this doesn't make you any less of an idiot"

--Walleye's Dad

on football.

Chances are she knows about routes.

what a doofus.

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

You are an interesting guy

I'm from the lost black tribe of Israel, the Yos

http://coolehmag.com/frontEnd/

one

Nontheless the point still stands. She's a sports reporter. Why would it be funny/strange that she's talking about routes?

If cam went at her bc her question was poor or dumb, this would be a different convo.

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

at Home Depot and she asked him about Devin Funchess' route running? She's an reporter with access to an NFL team presser and she asked a question about football. Why the fuck is that "funny to hear"?

...I'm from the era when A.I. was the answer, now they think ai is the answer - Marlon Craft

That doesn't sound weird to you?

The wording sounds strange to me.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

you never heard the word physicality in sports? There was absolutely nothing wrong or clunky about that sentence. I thought you had an issue with the truck stick part lol

-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.

even though i'm not a Panthers fan but living in the area i do see that Funches is doing a better job not getting bumped off his routes and getting to the ball and securing it better than he has in the past. he's getting more YAC than he previously was because of it.

it's actually a great question.

I can tell by the look on his face he was on opiates,

Doesn't excuse what he did, opiates rarely impair social situational judgement

Dude probably thought he was untouchable at that moment, and the "lighter than air" feeling of the opiates probably exposed his non-PR opinion.

yeah, I thought that too.