|
why is Year One considered SOOO great? Now, don't me wrong, I definitely enjoyed it and thought it was a solid story, but it seems like most people, websites, and lists all consider it the best Batman graphic novel of all time. Even though I haven't read any others yet, I'm a little bit surprised by this.
for one, i thought it was wayy too short - Miller left way to many things implied or unexplored, for instance, this "training" abroad for years, what exactly did he do? where did he go? who trained him? i felt it was too assumed and rushed, i dunno...
also, catwoman. she's inspired to dress up as a cat just cuz she see's batman fighting cops? no other motives or anything? again, too quick
wayne's decision to dress up as a bat --> a bat just randomly flies through his study's window and he says "aha! i shal be a bat!" too random in my opinion (i liked it much better in batman begins how he fell into the hole and bats scared the shit out of him)
the biggest action scene, the one with SWAT chasing him and blowing up the building, was kinda dissapointing, at least the build-up to it was --> it all started with Batman saving an old lady from being hit by a truck. couldn't he have done something more controversial or badass to make the cops get SWAT on his ass? and don't even get me started on Brendan dropping bombs on the building he was in - a little too unrealistic, that would never ever happen, cops cant just bomb buildings since they're gonna be torn down anyway
another problem --> we never saw how the costume came to be, etc.
lastly, how did Batman and Gordon become friends all of a sudden? they had no previous contact (not even a conversation) apart from wayne, unmasked, saving his baby. sure, Batman and Gordon had the same plan, to save Gotham city from its corruption, but a meeting between the two would have been nice, at least one, cuz even tho we know Gordon assumes Wayne is Batman, it's never 100% confirmed by him (just cuz Wayne saved his baby, doesn't mean he's Batman). and Wayne being the prime suspect for being Batman cuz his parents were killed 25 years ago and cuz he's rich? a little iffy if u ask me. Miller could have provided a more plausible or direct motive.
Once again though, don't get me wrong. I DID really enjoy Year One. Gordon was extremely badass, Gotham was very gloomy, Batman looked dope in action, realistic, wasn't flawless, knew he was lucky a bunch of times, but I just wish we got more detail and development. I really believe that we are given a great outline for a Batman origin story, but I just wished it was explored more in-depth. And that's why I'm surprised it's considered the best Batman graphic novel, nothing else.
Let me know what you all think.
oh wait, one more thing about Year One
i wish we were given more Bruce Wayne in this. we never really got to know who he is, what's he's about, his personailty, etc.
and I just realized, i may be unfair toward this graphic novel, since i'm probably comparing it all to Batman Begins, where everything was more fleshed out, so I do realize that I shouldn't really do that, but hey, I'm human too.
I also do give Miller mad props for re-introducing Bats and I do recognize how important it is to continuity/the Batman cannon. I also realize that it really influenced Batman Begins and essentially provided its bare bones (Nolan and Goyer essentially copied most of it, just expanded on it more).
|