|
Only two things I disagree with are Sex and the City (haven't seen it) and this being a bad movie. I started thinking and was Heath Ledger's acting job any better than Liam Neeson in the first? I just think a lot of the rave is that Ledger had more room to go over the top with it so people think it's definitely better (but he did do a great job with it).
This is pretty much spot on though.
>...as in > >"its great" > >"greatest comic book movie ever!" > >"totally awesome" > > >when in reality it was a borefest outside of the Joker's >sketch comedy routines. > >because of Ledger's death, the Dark Knight has become the >current pop culture fascination, obsession, and....fix. > >"its the in thing, you have to see it", you have to like it, >you have to think its great..." > >its this summer's version of sex and the city. > >only difference is, that sex and the city was actually >somewhat good, and none of them bitches died. > >the movie suffers from poor writing. the characters tell the >story through exposition in their dialogue, as opposed to the >director actually doing his job, a bitch move as a >director/writer. one too many storylines. the main character, >the dark knight, is the 5th wheel and afterthought. dent and >the joker overshadow him (even gordon to an extent). You can >barely make out what the f*ck Alfred was saying with his >accent. F*cked the whole fabric of the "burning the forrest >down" moral of the story up. > >again, all this sh*t would be noticed, had Ledger had not >died. there would be no oscar talk. he would be just a cool >ass character had he lived. not a legend in the making, >oscar-worthy, james dean like tragedy they are making Heath's >death out to be. > >the execs are happy as f*ck. and scared as f*ck. they raking >in the dough now, but they had Ledger's death to get over the >hump, since the movie they actually made sucked. they can't >get over next time. the Joker is now a stain on the brain of >the viewing public. Ledger is now the new James Dean. Whatever >villain you put in his place, aint going to work. Not to say, >it couldn't work. It just won't. the viewing public has >deified Ledger. Commercially they are straight. They could >still do Spider-Man 3 numbers with the 3rd movie. But i don't >think they will be immune from Spider-Man 3-like critical >panning, like the Dark Knight should have received. Because if >they continue the b.s. they did with the Dark Knight, they >won't have Ledger's death as a masquerade (no pun-o) the 3rd >time around. >
------- "Andy justifies my hate." http://www.twitter.com/coatesvillain http://coates.tumblr.com
|