|
It was great to see the film on a personal level because I grew up around the area and did some work at Wiley. A friend dropped the screenplay on me a few months ago, and I got some idea it might be something special. Or, that it could be a bit over the top, which only really came up a couple of times.
But...
****POSSIBLE SPOILERS****
I think this film's professed themes are far too important to Hollywood-ize it too much. Case in point: don't change USC to Harvard because it seems more prestigious or whatever. Keep it more or less accurate, so far as the events presented.
How can a fictional character (Booke) have a title card at the close of the film alongside Farmer's? Why don't they mention that Farmer served in the leadership of a Socialist organization but later served in the Nixon Administration? (Okay, I understand why you leave that off the resume)
Also, IIRC, but wasn't Tolson part of the clique that didn't care too much for Zora Neale Hurston? Then why does he name-drop her? I guess it's a name people would respond to now, but why include it if the issues are not so cut and dried?
And why do they gloss over the role of the Communist party? A woman next to me in the theater was frontin like she recognized the Langston Hughes quotes then started clucking when they accused Tolson of being a Communist. Tolson was a Communist. Hughes was a Communist. So were many many other people in this era. Please don't whitewash it, because we could really use some perspective on politically viable options open to us.
Finally, Willie Lynch!!! Need I say more about this? The integrity of the film absolutely cannot withstand the presentation of Willie Lynch as fact, especially in such a rhetorically powerful part of the film. I read a review that mentioned a discussion panel where some of the film's stars were defending the Willie Lynch speech as true. Please. Stop. Now.
Don't get me wrong. I loved the film, but it comes dangerously close to becoming a popcorn flick once this damage is done. If it's a popcorn flick, the film's messages about civil disobedience, resistance, revolution, social welfare, etc are lost, and its moral lessons are reduced to "lynching was bad, inequality was bad, now aren't we glad we've come so far?"
|