Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #585589

Subject: "Martha Marcy May Marlene (Durkin, 2011)" Previous topic | Next topic
bwood
Member since Apr 03rd 2006
8650 posts
Sat Oct-22-11 09:22 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Martha Marcy May Marlene (Durkin, 2011)"
Sun Oct-23-11 09:53 AM by Frank Longo

          

The initial poster liked it, but I'm censoring it due to several what I consider to be spoilers. Sorry, bwood. I'll repost your review below properly labeled.

------------------------------------------
America from 9:00 on: https://youtu.be/GUwLCQU10KQ

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
Bwood's review: *** SPOILERS ***
Oct 23rd 2011
1
My bad I really wasn't trying to spoil anything. nm
Oct 23rd 2011
2
Did you see David Denby's review of it?
Oct 24th 2011
3
the song:
Oct 25th 2011
4
Olson's performance is truly worthy of the praise it's getting.
Oct 30th 2011
5
Oh my goodness. What a powerfully haunting film.
Nov 07th 2011
6
Martha Marcy May Marlene
Nov 28th 2011
7
about the ending **obviously spoilers**
Nov 28th 2011
8
finally watched this on demand today
Feb 27th 2012
9
RE: finally watched this on demand today
Feb 28th 2012
10
Durkin said as much
Feb 28th 2012
14
hmmm
Feb 28th 2012
15
Huh? I think there's a pretty clear resolution.
Feb 28th 2012
11
like take shelter, the ending was ambiguous imo
Feb 28th 2012
12
Well... *spoiler*
Feb 28th 2012
13
huh!!! you just said exactly why its not clear
Feb 28th 2012
16
Jesus Christ! that last paragraph i wrote was turrbl
Feb 29th 2012
17

Frank Longo
Member since Nov 18th 2003
86795 posts
Sun Oct-23-11 09:53 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "Bwood's review: *** SPOILERS ***"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

I did a search and saw nothing. If there is another post redirect me.

Saw this shit two weeks ago.

First off who knew Elizabeth Olsen had some big titties? I didn't and wouldn't expect to either judging with her clothes on.

Man is this some creepy tense filled shit. As my moderator said to John Hawkes during the Q&A his character is a nice blend of creepy, evil, and smooth. It's amazing how his character Patrick easily brainwashes the members of his cult to do some seriously disgusting and despicable shit.

Part of the reason the tension runs high throughout this film is Elizabeth Olsen. Her character Martha is seriously fucked up from what happened at the cult and her twisted psyche and trouble adapting back into the fold of normal life makes this shit dummy tense. The story is told from her point of view, so Martha's paranoia is transplanted on the audience very effectively due to her performance and the structure of the film.

Also the structure of the film makes this tense too. The film flashes back to the past to show the time in the cult and shows the now in the present. Watching the layers of the flashback with the ever increasing situation in the present makes the film alot more interesting as if it would have a normal narrative.

The score is fucking creepy and unnerving and adds that third layer that builds upon the tension.

Now with that all said Hugh Dancy's character is a fucking douche. Martha is obviously fucked in the head and what does he do in one scene, wakes her up in the middle of the night and chases her around the house and acts like a victim when she kicks him down the stairs. When he's introduced you could tell this dude was going to be a prick.

Also, the abrupt ending is gonna piss some people off. But this has sparked conversations that have go on forever on have they or haven't they.

What's interesting to note is that Sean Durkin has talked to real cult members who escaped and has said what Martha experiences in the film, is what some of them have experienced for two months to even two years after escaping. Imagine living like that for two years. It was hard experiencing that for two hours...

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

bwood
Member since Apr 03rd 2006
8650 posts
Sun Oct-23-11 10:55 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "My bad I really wasn't trying to spoil anything. nm"
In response to Reply # 0


          

------------------------------------------
America from 9:00 on: https://youtu.be/GUwLCQU10KQ

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
janey
Charter member
123124 posts
Mon Oct-24-11 04:42 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "Did you see David Denby's review of it?"
In response to Reply # 2


  

          

The spoilers he included made me want to see the movie LOL

~ ~ ~
All meetings end in separation
All acquisition ends in dispersion
All life ends in death
- The Buddha

|\_/|
='_'=

Every hundred years, all new people

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

little bredren
Member since Apr 18th 2005
3286 posts
Tue Oct-25-11 04:49 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "the song:"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

the song:

http://recordinglivefromsomewhere.wordpress.com/2011/10/25/john-hawkes-marcys-song-jackson-c-frank-cover-from-the-2011-sundance-hit-martha-marcy-may-marlene/

John Hawkes is the man.

Music, movies, and everything in between: http://recordinglivefromsomewhere.com & http://twitter.com/marko_orlic

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

The Analyst
Member since Sep 22nd 2007
4621 posts
Sun Oct-30-11 11:09 AM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "Olson's performance is truly worthy of the praise it's getting."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

Maybe some will disagree with me, or maybe there'll be a backlash from all this praise, but I was really, really impressed by Olson here. Incredible screen presence. Like, magnetic. That combined with her somewhat naturalistic style literally conjured up memories of, like, 'Five Easy Pieces' Nicholson or something, as crazy as that might sound. I'm not saying she's in that Nicholson or early Pacino class or anything, but she was damn good. The movie succeeds in large part due to her and Hawkes.

I thought the movie itself was really strong too. I've seen some people complain a little about the deliberately confusing cutting back and forth between the past and the present, but I think it was pretty effective in showing how Martha's mind is consumed with those memories/nightmares and how they basically render her incapable of having a "normal" life.


SPOILERS:


I liked the ending. I don't always like that "cut to black" trick, but in this case I thought it worked. The last few minutes let the audience know exactly how Martha felt, and how she'd feel the rest of her life until she gets help. Paranoid, fearful, not knowing what's going to happen. Again, Olson's acting here is great. She's paranoid - she knows she's paranoid - she's trying to suppress it - but she's not totally able to.

----

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

dgonsh
Member since Aug 14th 2002
10701 posts
Mon Nov-07-11 09:17 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
6. "Oh my goodness. What a powerfully haunting film. "
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

My gf is still shaken by it. She keeps quivering with fear. She was a psychology major who is severely effed up by how easily the mind can be brainwashed and how one never truly escapes something like that.

Olsen and Hawkes deserve nods for this flick. Hawkes definitely deserves the statue he was deserving of a year ago. Can't believe he followed up such a dark role with an even darker one.

********************************************************************




"I *always* quote myself. I'm the only reliable source on *most* subjects" - OKP's First Lady of Knowledge, Janey

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
princeguy
Charter member
977 posts
Mon Nov-28-11 02:01 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
7. "Martha Marcy May Marlene"
In response to Reply # 6


          

The story of a young woman played by Elizabeth Olsen attempting to leave behind the life and ways she adopted from a cult she once belonged to.

The movie starts with her calling her sister for help to get away from the cult and its leader. She has now taken refuge with her unknowing sister in her home. Her sister is a very logical, college educated, and pretty straight-laced person. Her sister's boyfriend is also there in the home. He's also educated, well centered, and cultured, but not as straight laced as his girlfriend. Given this particular scenario, there are instances of confusion, conflict, and just plain weirdness that transpires between the trio as they live under the same roof.

The life Olsen lived with the cult was a very communal driven experience, whereas all of the women had sex with (and raped by) the leader of the cult. They all have roles within their cult and they live together. The cult also has a violent side that couples with hippie-like behavior, so there is passive-aggressiveness everywhere. This actually creates the mystique the cult and its leader possess.

Olsen never tells her sister she was in the cult at all. Her sister believes she just disappeared for 2 years and is now back. The effects from having been abused in the cult, and adopting its way of life mentally, manifests in Olsen's behavior when she's living with her sister and her boyfriend. These instances of communal life beliefs, and mentally disturbed passive aggressive behaviors drive the movie.

Knowing of the evil the cult was capable of, presents the danger in the movie. Olsen called the cult on the phone from her sister's house AFTER she left them and was living with her sister. She started to fear they would find her and come back and get her. This fear created the tension and fear in the movie, and it fueled her paranoid and new mentally challenged psyche and behavior.

Olsen's performance in the movie was excellent. The intimacy and tension in the movie was also excellent. The movie is NOT very creepy. It is NOT very scary, or thrilling. There are times where the movie can be considered slow. Don't expect a roller-coaster ride. There were however, pockets of tension and anticipation. All of the characters were interesting and complex. The acting and the cast was great.

The ending for this movie was HORRIBLE. It was worse than HORRIBLE. It was one of those endings to a movie where you look around and wait for Ashton Kutcher to run at you laughing with his camera because you just got Punked! Its as if they ran out of money and called it a wrap. It was as if the editing destroyed the rest of the film and they had to punch in the credits at the part where the movie was actually getting exciting. It was bad. And you will be mad. You will want to watch all the credits go by expecting that it was done on purpose and the movie isn't actually over because its gonna continue after the credits. But it doesn't. Its sort of unbelievable.

Overall, Olsen's performance and the directing was on point. She was stellar. The acting and characters were great. Everything was believable. But, the ending just pulls the rug out from under you so so bad, that you really can't recommend it to anyone and feel good about it. If you go into knowing this, and don't mind, then go see it. If you HATE endings like that, stay far far away.

Princeguy reviews:

"No pretentiousness.

No pompous re-interpretations.

Sometimes, a movie is just a movie. You work hard for your money.

The decision is yours.

See and enjoy what YOU like."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

pdafunk
Charter member
5445 posts
Mon Nov-28-11 04:32 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
8. "about the ending **obviously spoilers**"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

i had no problem with it. i mean, you knew that there was no way the ending was going to be "happy". i actually thought it was going to end with her drowning herself. but i think the ending was in keeping with the rest of the film in that she is detached, has trouble telling what's real & what's not, and is going to live with that kind of paranoia for a long time, perhaps forever.

------
"I can't promise I'll try. But I'll try to try."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

astralblak
Member since Apr 05th 2007
20029 posts
Mon Feb-27-12 10:06 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. "finally watched this on demand today"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

if walking around screen looking detached and lost and crumbling into a fetal position every 10min is GREAT acting, i need to push some of my nieces in that direction. In all seriousness Olsen held it down, I definitely felt i was watching a young woman experience the trauma of being raped, manipulated, and witnessing a murder, BUT it did not have the grit, gravitas or internal machinations of say Michelle in Blue Valentine or Portman in Black Swan.

the film overall was well executed. i enjoyed how it fluidly moved from the life on the farm, to her life in her sisters home to further immerse the viewer in Martha's anxiety and distress. The dread was also carried very well throughout, in particular by another brilliant performance by Hawkes. What a fucn magnetic scumbag creep. The screen was absorbed by his warped-libertarian man of power whenever he appeared on screen. Maria Dizzia as Katie was also a great creepo performance.

Unlike most indy films of the recent times, I liked that shit was actually happening: from her rape, to the scene with her sister fucking, to the murder, but I PERSONALLY needed some resolution. I'm not one to trip about unresolved conflict in films, but here it left the film roaming in an incomplete atmosphere that subverts all of Olsen's emotionality. If we are not going to really get a back story on the two sisters, or have her reveal to her sister what she just went through, and only get random allusions to the farm cult coming, lets have Martha, her sister and hubby finally deal with said cult. Th ending was a cop out to me

anyway 3.5/5

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
dgonsh
Member since Aug 14th 2002
10701 posts
Tue Feb-28-12 10:41 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
10. "RE: finally watched this on demand today"
In response to Reply # 9


  

          

I disagree about the ending. While the soap opera fan in us would love to see the story play out in a serial fashion, there is no escape for Martha. She is haunted. She is traumatized. And while she may go on with her life, she'll never escape the grasp the cult has on her and her psyche. She's fucked. Unless she fully accepts massive psychological treatment, she will continue to be a victim, being stalked by visions of her past.

that's how i interpreted and accepted the ending.

********************************************************************




"I *always* quote myself. I'm the only reliable source on *most* subjects" - OKP's First Lady of Knowledge, Janey

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
Mageddon
Charter member
4018 posts
Tue Feb-28-12 02:16 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
14. "Durkin said as much"
In response to Reply # 10


  

          

at TIFF after the screening, when someone asked him about the ending. He said (not his exact words) that the (psychological) problems Martha has is something she will likely deal with the rest of her life, and is something he couldn't (or didn't want to?) wrap up.

I was satisfied with the ending, his explanation, and I think your interpretation is sound.



>I disagree about the ending. While the soap opera fan in us
>would love to see the story play out in a serial fashion,
>there is no escape for Martha. She is haunted. She is
>traumatized. And while she may go on with her life, she'll
>never escape the grasp the cult has on her and her psyche.
>She's fucked. Unless she fully accepts massive psychological
>treatment, she will continue to be a victim, being stalked by
>visions of her past.
>
>that's how i interpreted and accepted the ending.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
astralblak
Member since Apr 05th 2007
20029 posts
Tue Feb-28-12 08:59 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
15. "hmmm"
In response to Reply # 10


  

          

i can dig that explanation of it a lot actually. right on

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
Frank Longo
Member since Nov 18th 2003
86795 posts
Tue Feb-28-12 10:53 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
11. "Huh? I think there's a pretty clear resolution."
In response to Reply # 9


  

          

The man from the dock is the dude behind her. Whether he kills the family and takes Martha or just keeps tabs on her, she's trapped.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
dgonsh
Member since Aug 14th 2002
10701 posts
Tue Feb-28-12 12:09 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
12. "like take shelter, the ending was ambiguous imo"
In response to Reply # 11


  

          

there is no evidence that the guy she saw on the dock was actually there, and there is no evidence that he's in the car.

i agree though, whether he's real or not, she is indeed trapped.

if they come after her (which i don't believe they'd risk), she's fucked. if they dont and she's left with the fear of them coming after her, she's fucked. either way, this girl is seriously damaged.

********************************************************************




"I *always* quote myself. I'm the only reliable source on *most* subjects" - OKP's First Lady of Knowledge, Janey

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
Frank Longo
Member since Nov 18th 2003
86795 posts
Tue Feb-28-12 01:15 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
13. "Well... *spoiler*"
In response to Reply # 12


  

          

I did a little digging, because I suspected the director dressed the man in the car exactly like the man on the dock with reason. Sure enough, in the script, it indicates that the man in the car was the man on the dock.

Now yes, it could be a paranoid hallucination, I suppose. But the question at the film's resolution isn't "will she escape?" The question is, "can she live?" We get a definite "no" answer-- she's under the cult's control at the end, either literally or mentally.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
astralblak
Member since Apr 05th 2007
20029 posts
Tue Feb-28-12 09:01 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
16. "huh!!! you just said exactly why its not clear"
In response to Reply # 11
Tue Feb-28-12 09:01 PM by astralblak

  

          

either A, B or C can happen, lol.

to be clear i wanted one of the three to happen ON SCREEN, that's all. he kills her/them, they fight him off, or they extend the film 5-10 min to show that they def keepin' tabs on her, which obviously they were, so i guess i just wanted A or B to happen on screen

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
astralblak
Member since Apr 05th 2007
20029 posts
Wed Feb-29-12 12:12 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
17. "Jesus Christ! that last paragraph i wrote was turrbl"
In response to Reply # 9


  

          

it doesn't make sense honestly. dgnosh def has the accurate interpretation of the ending and resolution of Ms. 4M

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #585589 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com