Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #484514

Subject: "lol @ 2001 still being the most realistic space movie after 40+ years" Previous topic | Next topic
PimpMacula
Member since Dec 19th 2006
12972 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 12:27 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"lol @ 2001 still being the most realistic space movie after 40+ years"


  

          

Another reason why Kubrick is top 5 all time.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
AND anotha reason why its listed as the AFI's #1 sci-fi flim of all time...
Nov 02nd 2009
1
it's another reason why sci fi movies basically all suck
Nov 02nd 2009
2
i believe there's really only one glaring mistake.
Nov 02nd 2009
3
Yup. He woulda exploded.
Nov 02nd 2009
4
His head would have exploded the pod bay door open.
Nov 02nd 2009
8
      RE: His head would have exploded the pod bay door open.
Nov 03rd 2009
9
           I was saying it more for comedic effect, but yes
Nov 03rd 2009
10
RE: i believe there's really only one glaring mistake.
Nov 02nd 2009
5
      ^ Hasn't seen 2010 yet.
Nov 02nd 2009
6
           RE: ^ Hasn't seen 2010 yet.
Nov 02nd 2009
7
RE: lol @ 2001 still being the most realistic space movie after 40+ year...
Nov 03rd 2009
11
fuck it, i'll say it... Kubrick is the GOAT
Nov 03rd 2009
12
RE: fuck it, i'll say it... Kubrick is the GOAT
Nov 03rd 2009
13
      RE: fuck it, i'll say it... Kubrick is the GOAT
Nov 03rd 2009
14
           The greatest argument for Kubrick as GOAT is his versatility.
Nov 03rd 2009
15
people who deny his greatness amuse me......check his portfolio
Nov 04th 2009
16
That may have more to do with Arthur Clarke's involvement.
Nov 04th 2009
17

Airbreed
Charter member
29442 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 12:43 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "AND anotha reason why its listed as the AFI's #1 sci-fi flim of all time..."
In response to Reply # 0
Mon Nov-02-09 12:46 PM by Airbreed

  

          

and...

- considered culturally significant by the U.S. Library of Congres AND selected for preservation in the National Film Register AND used in textbooks by private and public university film courses across the country.

Kubrick will always be my hero.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Rjcc
Charter member
95041 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 12:47 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
2. "it's another reason why sci fi movies basically all suck"
In response to Reply # 0


          

how many decades have they been doing it wrong?

http://card.mygamercard.net/lastgame/rjcc.png

www.engadgethd.com - the other stuff i'm looking at

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

thoughtprocess
Member since Nov 16th 2003
22223 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 01:39 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "i believe there's really only one glaring mistake."
In response to Reply # 0


          

and the author said he would have corrected him if he had seen it. when david bowman is reentering the ship, he should be breathing out rather than holding his breath.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
stravinskian
Member since Feb 24th 2003
12700 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 06:30 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
4. "Yup. He woulda exploded."
In response to Reply # 3


          


But I'm sure Kubrick coulda made a hell of a shot outta that if he tried.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
thoughtprocess
Member since Nov 16th 2003
22223 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 11:10 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
8. "His head would have exploded the pod bay door open."
In response to Reply # 4


          

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
PimpMacula
Member since Dec 19th 2006
12972 posts
Tue Nov-03-09 08:04 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
9. "RE: His head would have exploded the pod bay door open."
In response to Reply # 8
Tue Nov-03-09 08:19 AM by PimpMacula

  

          

where are you guys getting this "exploding" shit from?

according to NASA, the movie still remains technically accurate.

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/970603.html

If you don't try to hold your breath, exposure to space for half a minute or so is unlikely to produce permanent injury. Holding your breath is likely to damage your lungs, something scuba divers have to watch out for when ascending, and you'll have eardrum trouble if your Eustachian tubes are badly plugged up, but theory predicts -- and animal experiments confirm -- that otherwise, exposure to vacuum causes no immediate injury. You do not explode. Your blood does not boil. You do not freeze. You do not instantly lose consciousness.

Various minor problems (sunburn, possibly "the bends", certainly some swelling of skin and underlying tissue) start after ten seconds or so. At some point you lose consciousness from lack of oxygen. Injuries accumulate. After perhaps one or two minutes, you're dying. The limits are not really known.

You do not explode and your blood does not boil because of the containing effect of your skin and circulatory system. You do not instantly freeze because, although the space environment is typically very cold, heat does not transfer away from a body quickly. Loss of consciousness occurs only after the body has depleted the supply of oxygen in the blood. If your skin is exposed to direct sunlight without any protection from its intense ultraviolet radiation, you can get a very bad sunburn.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

                
thoughtprocess
Member since Nov 16th 2003
22223 posts
Tue Nov-03-09 09:07 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
10. "I was saying it more for comedic effect, but yes"
In response to Reply # 9


          

i think there can be severe damage to your blood vessels pretty quickly too.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
PimpMacula
Member since Dec 19th 2006
12972 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 07:31 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
5. "RE: i believe there's really only one glaring mistake."
In response to Reply # 3


  

          

just imagine if kubrik were in his prime in this era of special fx technology!!! 2001 could easily be the GOAT movie all time.

all i know is, they better not EVER try to remake this masterpiece with keanu reeves on some shit. i would rip my eyebrows off.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
stravinskian
Member since Feb 24th 2003
12700 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 07:35 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
6. "^ Hasn't seen 2010 yet."
In response to Reply # 5


          


Don't.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
PimpMacula
Member since Dec 19th 2006
12972 posts
Mon Nov-02-09 08:30 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
7. "RE: ^ Hasn't seen 2010 yet."
In response to Reply # 6


  

          

uh, yea i saw 2010.. it's meh. i'm speaking specifically about a remake of the ORIGINAL 2001.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

ChanEpic
Charter member
4298 posts
Tue Nov-03-09 09:33 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
11. "RE: lol @ 2001 still being the most realistic space movie after 40+ year..."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

That film becomes even more spectacular when you consider the sci-fi made BEFORE it came out. Plan 9 from outer space. I was a teenage werewolf etc etc etc.. That film is the visual definition of paradigm shift. There would be no Star wars, Alien without it.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

THEdirtyone
Charter member
12088 posts
Tue Nov-03-09 02:02 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
12. "fuck it, i'll say it... Kubrick is the GOAT"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

You know, we could all be reading a book right now.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
PimpMacula
Member since Dec 19th 2006
12972 posts
Tue Nov-03-09 02:05 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
13. "RE: fuck it, i'll say it... Kubrick is the GOAT"
In response to Reply # 12


  

          

i think if he was able to do AI before he died, the GOAT argument could be made. kubrick would have made that a masterpiece.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

        
THEdirtyone
Charter member
12088 posts
Tue Nov-03-09 02:30 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
14. "RE: fuck it, i'll say it... Kubrick is the GOAT"
In response to Reply # 13


  

          

I would argue he doesn't need A.I.

Look at this resume, it's ridiculous. And I'm only counting the ones i've seen.

Eyes Wide Shut (1999)
Full Metal Jacket (1987)
The Shining (1980)
Barry Lyndon (1975)
A Clockwork Orange (1971)
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)
Dr. Strangelove (1964)
Lolita (1962)
Spartacus (1960)
Paths of Glory (1957)
The Killing (1956)
Killer's Kiss (1955)

I've heard people argue the Shining is a bad movie, but I would put that in my top 5 horror movies... Sorry.
The weakest movie is Eyes Wide Shut, which I even liked as sort of a stylized porno.

You know, we could all be reading a book right now.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

            
theeraser
Member since Feb 11th 2007
7218 posts
Tue Nov-03-09 08:32 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
15. "The greatest argument for Kubrick as GOAT is his versatility."
In response to Reply # 14


          

He made masterpieces in more different styles/chambers/genres/whatever you want to call them than any other director, HANDS DOWN.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Deebot
Member since Oct 21st 2004
26762 posts
Wed Nov-04-09 01:18 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
16. "people who deny his greatness amuse me......check his portfolio"
In response to Reply # 0


          

best sci fi film of all time? Check

best horror film of all time? Check

one of the best comedies of all time? Check

one of the best period pieces ever? Check.

Cmon.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Triptych
Charter member
30127 posts
Wed Nov-04-09 04:57 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IMClick to send message via ICQ
17. "That may have more to do with Arthur Clarke's involvement."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

Well, give Kubrick credit for *wanting* realism in the first place and *listening* to Clarke.

But also Clarke really can't be totally forgotten in that.

____________________________

http://instagram.com/yogikenan
http://instagram.com/shotbykenan
http://stackoverflow.com/users/43089/triptych
http://github.com/djtriptych

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby Pass The Popcorn topic #484514 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com