|
First: it’s a terrible analogy.
An album is a recording. The album is what it is from the day it drops onward. It doesn’t change. The songs don’t get better or worse, though the context in which they are received by a given listener might change. Still, it’s a static product and can be compared to any album at any time.
The passage of time will determine where an album ultimately falls in a historical context, but that passage of time is not required to determine how one piece of music stacks up against another.
It’s just about the laziest and intellectually inept devices people employ when trying to discredit immediate high praise for art. An album is a product that exists in the same way today, tomorrow, and the next. We’re discussing just that: an album, not a career. Or, in the case of one poster above, two albums in direct comparison to two other specific albums.
Yet, you went with a basketball analogy, an incredibly fluid and dynamic endeavor. Worse, you viewed this as a guy “having his best season” to Jordan. Not Jordan’s best season, but JORDAN, which implies the totality of his career.
The notion that we need some long period of time to determine how good an album is or isn’t is absurd and downright arbitrary. It’s also a telling response from a guy like you, who still hasn’t offered a single thought on the actual album itself despite flooding the post with your trite little missives toward those who actually did.
You’re clearly, inarguably the guy who is “in his feelings” because he can’t stand to see something new get the high praise it deserves because it hasn’t met your arbitrary moratorium.
What’s funny here is not only can you not provide an idea of a reasonable amount of time that should pass before accepting the glowing though purely subjective praise of a piece of art, but the fact that the second you DID provide that number, you would only further illustrate how arbitrary and petty it really is.
|