Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby General Discussion topic #13484079

Subject: "things the US isn't serious about:" Previous topic | Next topic
tariqhu
Charter member
17894 posts
Sat May-06-23 10:28 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
"things the US isn't serious about:"


          

1. making this gun situation better.

2. Making this racism situation better

3. Making this Women's rights situation better


Things the US is serious about.

1. Restricting Blacks and other non-whites

2. Restricting women's ability to control their bodies

3. Retricting guns. oh wait....that's not true. sorry.



Y'all buy those labels, I was born supreme

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
Holding police departments accountable
May 07th 2023
1
universal healthcare
May 07th 2023
2
Can you provide clarification on your list?
May 07th 2023
3
sure.
May 07th 2023
4

Lurkmode
Member since May 07th 2011
5190 posts
Sun May-07-23 10:27 AM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "Holding police departments accountable"
In response to Reply # 0


  

          


for the (45 out of 99 in one department) bad apples.


https://abc7news.com/antioch-police-texts-racist-report-chief/13129680/

"This report documents some of the derogatory, homophobic, and sexually explicit language and photographs shared by members of the Antioch Police Department that demonstrates their racial bias and animus towards African Americans and other people of color in the community.

---------------------------
Signature

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

JayEmm
Member since Feb 06th 2004
3300 posts
Sun May-07-23 12:48 PM

Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
2. "universal healthcare "
In response to Reply # 0


  

          


  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Kira
Member since Nov 14th 2004
28846 posts
Sun May-07-23 01:22 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
3. "Can you provide clarification on your list?"
In response to Reply # 0
Sun May-07-23 01:23 PM by Kira

  

          

My list:

White supremacy
Reparations for thee black community that built this country. Good luck to the diaspora fighting their own battles respect to them.
Punishing white men, women, and their allies properly.
Targeting and exploiting the black community.


>3. Making this Women's rights situation better
>

Can you define women? It's 2023 "women" has different definitions and categories, so please clarify. Women are not a monolith with the exception of.... If you mean white women I'm calling bullshit.... If you mean white women or minorities that identify as white this post going POST cause a clear discrepancy in treatment exists.

If you mean black women absolutely, fix this situation asap.


>Things the US is serious about.
>
>1. Restricting Blacks and other non-whites

What non whites are you talking about? If you mean latinos this post going POST and you insulting my dead ancestors.... Restrict non whites compared to WHO historically? Did they get Jim Crow laws? Do you mean historically non white or the modern status quo that encourages and supports non white groups identifying as white in order to receive support from the dominant society?

There's only way restrictions get fixed in the black community and I can't say it but history exists to learn from.
>
>2. Restricting women's ability to control their bodies

Again, please be specific.

Restricting women's rights is an issue that has different meanings for different communities and ultimately comes down to white supremacy. Do I need to rehash the origins of Roe vs Wade? The people in power permitted and restricted women's rights with support from the vast majority of white women. Pardon self I'm a bit biased due to eugenicist origins of Planned Parenthood.

If you mean the black infant mortality rate absolutely fix this situation. No, that doesn't mean I support abortion don't even try it.
>
>3. Retricting guns. oh wait....that's not true. sorry.
>

This is the fourth time I'm asking for clarification. Can you clarify exactly what you mean? What additional gun restrictions should exist and how would you enforce them? Sheriff's around the country refused support for additional gun restrictions.

Gun restrictions exist so I'm confused, please clarify.

No empathy for white misery (c) BDot

"root for everybody black haters say that's crazy, wow..."

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

    
tariqhu
Charter member
17894 posts
Sun May-07-23 07:56 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
4. "sure. "
In response to Reply # 3


          

>My list:
>
>White supremacy
>Reparations for thee black community that built this country.
>Good luck to the diaspora fighting their own battles respect
>to them.
>Punishing white men, women, and their allies properly.
>Targeting and exploiting the black community.

alladat is racism. all things the country isn't working to fix and are actively digging their heels in more. that's what I mean, but not serious about it. the country gives the facade of doing right and does the opposite.
>
>
>>3. Making this Women's rights situation better
>>
>
>Can you define women? It's 2023 "women" has different
>definitions and categories, so please clarify. Women are not a
>monolith with the exception of.... If you mean white women I'm
>calling bullshit.... If you mean white women or minorities
>that identify as white this post going POST cause a clear
>discrepancy in treatment exists.

>
>If you mean black women absolutely, fix this situation asap.
>
women that could possibly get pregnant and make a decision to have or not have a baby, especially black women.

>
>>Things the US is serious about.
>>
>>1. Restricting Blacks and other non-whites
>
>What non whites are you talking about? If you mean latinos
>this post going POST and you insulting my dead ancestors....
>Restrict non whites compared to WHO historically? Did they get
>Jim Crow laws? Do you mean historically non white or the
>modern status quo that encourages and supports non white
>groups identifying as white in order to receive support from
>the dominant society?
>
>There's only way restrictions get fixed in the black community
>and I can't say it but history exists to learn from.
>>

I'm not talking specifically about laws. More so culturally. However, there are sections of cities that that were designated as less desirable and because of laws, blacks and other non-whites were pushed to those areas. that's how you get a Chinatown.

>>2. Restricting women's ability to control their bodies
>
>Again, please be specific.

again, women that could possibly get pregnant and make a decision to have or not have a baby especially black women.

>
>Restricting women's rights is an issue that has different
>meanings for different communities and ultimately comes down
>to white supremacy. Do I need to rehash the origins of Roe vs
>Wade? The people in power permitted and restricted women's
>rights with support from the vast majority of white women.
>Pardon self I'm a bit biased due to eugenicist origins of
>Planned Parenthood.

yup, racism.
>
>If you mean the black infant mortality rate absolutely fix
>this situation. No, that doesn't mean I support abortion don't
>even try it.

I wasn't talking about the black infant mortality rate. that definitely needs to be fixed asap.

you don't have to support abortion, but you also shouldn't be making laws against it that will negatively affect black women more than others.

>>
>>3. Retricting guns. oh wait....that's not true. sorry.
>>
>
>This is the fourth time I'm asking for clarification. Can you
>clarify exactly what you mean? What additional gun
>restrictions should exist and how would you enforce them?
>Sheriff's around the country refused support for additional
>gun restrictions.
>
>Gun restrictions exist so I'm confused, please clarify.

I didn't say there weren't laws for restricting guns. I said the country isn't serious about it. if they're not enforced, then they're relegated to just being guidelines or suggestions.

having a law on the books and not enforcing is not how you show that you're for real about who can access guns and how they can do so. it's a paper tiger.

for example, if the restriction only limits access based on where you can buy it, but there a loophole that says you can buy it elsewhere with less hassle, where are gonna buy the guns? it's still legal, so what is the restriction?

yeah, stolen guns and undergrond markets are a real thing. admittedly, laws won't really matter for those avenues. I'm talking about the shootering where the guns were bought legally.

I don't have a solution. maybe we can look to other countries to get an better idea of how enforcement actually works.maybe actually limit the types of guns that citizens can purchase.





>
>

Y'all buy those labels, I was born supreme

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby General Discussion topic #13484079 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com