Balance of the court won't change, but at least a younger person can get in there

Biden and the senate better not fumble this

_______________________________________

>Balance of the court won't change, but at least a younger
>person can get in there
>
>The Biden and the senate better not fumble this

yeah RBG already screwed us trying to wait for Hillary

________________________________________
"Take the surprise out your voice Shaq."-The REAL CP3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2H5K-BUMS0

You better not screw this up.

**Sig**
-Blackthought is the dopest emcee alive
-Uncle Sam and Santa Clause are good buddies.
-Be selfless and the world will be a better place.

potential nominees that are on Biden’s list.

2. This is an easy win for them to help appease some of their voters and base back at home.

ACB got confirmed in like 12 minutes

------------------------------

17x NBA Champions

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

Yes, I'm mad. Let's move on.

Jays | Cavs | Eagles | Sabres | Tarheels

PSN: Dr_Claw_77 | XBL: Dr Claw 077 | FB: drclaw077 | T: @drclaw77 | http://thepeoplesvault.wordpress.com

<--- Big Baller World Order

just dems in general being dems

nm

______________________________

"Walleye, a lot of things are going to go wrong in your life that technically aren't your fault. Always remember that this doesn't make you any less of an idiot"

--Walleye's Dad

R.I.P. Loud But Wrong Guy
Dec 29th 2009 - Dec 17th 2017

https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/26/politics/white-house-reaction-breyer-retirement/index.html

________________________________________
"Take the surprise out your voice Shaq."-The REAL CP3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2H5K-BUMS0

I would stand and applaud if it was Anita Hill. She may not want that, but it would get the people going lol.

**Sig**
-Blackthought is the dopest emcee alive
-Uncle Sam and Santa Clause are good buddies.
-Be selfless and the world will be a better place.

Neil Gorsuch is 54.
Brett Kavanaugh is 56.
Amy Coney Barrett is 49.

We need judges who will stay around to counter the insane conservative Republican judges.

She's too old.

------------


Gone: My Discogs collection for The Roots:
http://www.discogs.com/user/tomhayes-roots/collection

I'm with you. I just wanted to see that black woman smirkin' from the bench. It won't happen, so agreed.

I'm sure they put together a shortlist when he won the election. Schumer seems like he knows what's up with that "deliberate speed" comment.

**Sig**
-Blackthought is the dopest emcee alive
-Uncle Sam and Santa Clause are good buddies.
-Be selfless and the world will be a better place.

dc circuit appeals court where most sc justices come from.

several prominent black political pundits suggested her name be floated for a seat in 2016...worst case scenario it would help juice black turnout during the election when people watched how republicans obstructed her hypothetical confirmation for a year. plus she is the sister in law of paul ryan...who had already heaped praise on her (and would look hypocritical if he said otherwise...tho that never stopped repubs lol).

but of course obama went with garland because he believed repubs still had some soul left and would offer a good faith approach to considering him.

shes 51 going on 52 this year.

First at the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights and then U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) both at Regan appointments. Clarence Thomas has been a piece of shit for a long time so when she was working with him she was working with him to undo civil rights and employee rights in both positions.

Anita Hill is the Gretchen Carlson type whistle blower.



**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson

"what's a leader if he isn't reluctant"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoBLi5eE-wY

________________________________________
"Take the surprise out your voice Shaq."-The REAL CP3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2H5K-BUMS0

Hell, i wanted her to be Joe's VP but she hates politics and all the noise.

I just like thinking of the mad making of it all

Truly one of his worst moments.

__________________________________________

I hope you live a life you’re proud of. If you find that you’re not, I hope you have the strength to start all over again.

— F. Scott Fitzgerald

it would prolly take 3 consecutive dem presidencies with some period of senate control in each admin just to have a *chance* to get the court back to a 5-4 1 seat conservative majority.

repubs play as a team and cycle justices out with much younger justices in a regular rotation.

dems just play it by ear and hope theres a dem president and senate when a liberal justice feels like retiring lol.

like rbg only stayed on the bench because she wanted to break the record for the oldest sc justice...while battling 3 forms of cancer smh. complete vanity project and now we will most likely never have a liberal majority on the supreme court for centuries (if ever).

salute to breyer for not being a complete asshole. he was worrying me a bit with his comments before this.

>like rbg only stayed on the bench because she wanted to break
>the record for the oldest sc justice...while battling 3 forms
>of cancer smh. complete vanity project and now we will most
>likely never have a liberal majority on the supreme court for
>centuries (if ever).

I assumed that she stuck around because she was certain that Hillary Clinton was gonna be the next president and she could retire during her term.

I agree it was reckless tho. Can't take big risks like that with something as important as a Supreme Court seat.

https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1023845163981041665

she listed the fact that john paul stevens was 90 when he retired as the motivating factor. the oldest scj ever (oliver wendell holmes) was 90 as well.

this was after multiple bouts of cancer, heart surgery, etc.

----------------------------------------

"Fuck aliens." © WarriorPoet415

https://twitter.com/tariqnasheed/status/1486454237928194050

you cant tell me these niggas arent paid opps.

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

smh

that biden should drop his vp and pick a republican 'unity' candidate.

because the candace owens thing is most likely a troll or just some casual uninformed citizen.

and the unity thing is coming from people who fashion themselves as intellectuals and political experts.

left-wing gripes/standards/etc.....)


....you wouldn't be having this convo


so...


This is why all that "abandoning Dems for this or that principle" is stupid.


And yes, y'all are talking about "primary-ing" Biden, so that's "Bernie or bust" 2 (Nader part 3)

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

presidential duty by far. 45 put 3 judges on the SC and set us back for decades

________________________________________
"Take the surprise out your voice Shaq."-The REAL CP3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2H5K-BUMS0

https://twitter.com/jenhab/status/1486421704897400837

thank God schumer already said their gonna move fast (and hes been confirming biden judges at the fastest pace since reagan...which is an under-discussed story).

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1486451522762272770

...and have infinite time.

It's a bunch of old folks in office. One unfortunate incident and you no longer have a majority to confirm a judge (see Ted Kennedy and Obamacare)

_______________________________________

I am not sure a black women can/should be the one to break that tradition. They will be coming for her neck any rate, these fuck heads tried to come for Princeton-Yale trained Sotomayor's intellect, imagine how they will come for the black woman without those credentials (but I guess Sotomayor makes the case they come for you anyway so why bother).


**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson

"what's a leader if he isn't reluctant"

They're whole game plan is to scratch and claw for power. They have nothing to lose because that's they're only cudgel.

**Sig**
-Blackthought is the dopest emcee alive
-Uncle Sam and Santa Clause are good buddies.
-Be selfless and the world will be a better place.

hire the person not the diploma

****************
TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*

of where they went to school

________________________________________
"Take the surprise out your voice Shaq."-The REAL CP3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2H5K-BUMS0

and would also be nice to break the overwhelming prosecutorial bias that has typified the Court for far too long. So many of the justices have been former prosecutors - as if it's the only viable route to becoming a judge.

There was an interesting segment where Clyburn was crediting Biden's promise to nominate a Black woman as the reason why he won the Democratic primary. Now he will have to make good on this promise - but wouldn't it have been more powerful if Biden didn't make some desperate campaign promise (when he was down and out) to pander - and instead just nominated a Black woman without all the political posturing and campaign promises?

Either way it will be dope to have a Black woman sitting in the Court, so it's not a huge gripe. But it still doesn't sit right that Biden only made this promise (begrudgingly too if you listen to the story behind it) when his campaign was down and out, as a hail-mary attempt to win SC (that worked).


-->

trump promised to put a woman on the supreme court and nobody had a single word of criticism for him because of it (and fox news actually promoted it).
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FKFGA0YX0AYtOB-?format=jpg&name=900x900

it was a cynical ploy to woo back the women voters who represented a bloc where trump/repub support was eroding.

so gender isnt off the table.

repubs openly talk about putting anti-abortion justices on the bench...an explicit ploy to please their most loyal voting bloc (white evangelicals).

so ideology/partisanship isnt off the table.

why cant biden pick a black woman explicitly to placate the most loyal dem voting bloc that saved his ass in the primary and general (*and* gave him 2 additional senate seats in traditionally red georgia)?

why is race off the table?

the 3 black women at the top of bidens list have more experience on the bench than 2 of the 3 justices trump appointed. so qualification/tenure isnt an issue either.

whats the problem exactly? why is pre-selecting a justice based on political considerations an issue *now*?

and again - it's a small gripe that's related to how it came about. Biden didn't want to make the promise to begin with - so it was disingenuous and to me would've been more powerful if he would've planned to do it all along without making the express promise.

Ultimately - it doesn't really matter how it gets done - it'll be a big deal. But the context matters somewhat.


-->

maybe he would have done it all along but he did announce it when he did for a reason.

the winner of the south carolina primary traditionally wins the nomination. as does the primary candidate who wins black voters. and those 2 are obviously correlated.

so it was a smart move (that others...particularly progressives...should learn from) and black voters rewarded him. so now hes holding up his end of the bargain.

its the type of transactional relationship many other political demographics have no shame demanding (evangelicals, labor unions, farmers, etc).

it should be noted that he has also appointed a historically diverse slate of judges across various districts including a historically astounding amount of black women.

thats something he *didnt* promise to win a primary but has done anyway and has gotten almost non-existent credit for it. so its likely he just believes that is the right/just thing to do.

either way...i dont care about his intention/motivation...i care about the tangible action. and so far...he is coming through on a clutch level in this area.

to run up the score.

That is clearly the winning strategy. Thats why we have President Bernard fixing everything with the wave of his hand.


And rehashing the primary is clearly the important piece here, regardless.

genuinely asking what people thought it was....with the benefit of time and hindsight now.

because i remember how there was a lot of talk about him winning the "ideas battle" or something like that and being some sort of transformational figure for the future of the democratic party.

but when you tally things up objectively...

hes never had any landmark legislation passed in congress.

he lost 2 straight primaries. completely flopped in the 2nd one and was functionally eliminated on super tuesday...despite being 1 of the frontrunners with a massive fundraising and organization/infrastructure advantage. arguably one of the worst run dem primary campaigns in the modern era when you factor shit like you alluded to above.

he didnt energize young voters or people who traditionally feel disaffected by the political process (which was basically his whole mantra).

biden stomped him out with white working class voters (which he claimed he had the platform to bring them back into the dem party).

nobody talks about medicare for all for anymore. in fact...support for *obamacare* helped dems win their best midterm since watergate. and support for obamacare has only increased since then...to the point that republicans dont even dare bring it up (shit a lot of them lied and said they supported it lol) and obamacare signups just hit a record across the board.
https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1486676765682638853

elizabeth warren has more policy input/sway with the current administration.

the *one* bill that sanders was tasked with pushing through as the budget committee chairman...bbb/social spending...completely collapsed with progressives getting steamrolled on separate bif passage.

many of his high profile supporters (greenwald, gabbard, dore, rogan, etc) are openly right wing trolls now.

and his 'movement' repelled a lot of former allies and basically just succeeded in pushing many progressive and further left leaning voters into the mainstream party establishment.

i didnt wanna rock the boat tho.

-->

and are trump supporters now.

nice movement there lol.

do you disagree with anything i said? on a factual basis?

>do you disagree with anything i said? on a factual basis?

We could start there. Please bring the facts.

-->

There is P L E N T Y to trash the Biden admin over. Plenty.


But, for some reason, you chose reference him winning SC by promising to nominate a Black woman to the SC. Thats your complaint here.

And seemed to insinuate that is the only reason he won SC. (Which lets assume that is true, why didn't your boy do it if its so easy?)

I'd love to see a politician who doesn't pander, btw.

I think it is very telling that you are perfectly okay with Bernie pandering to Joe Rogan fans but not Biden pandering to Black voters. Very telling.


Regardless...


You are the one who brought the primary/Bernie into the convo for no reason.


And before you claim you didn't, we all knew what you meant.


Why is the primary on your mind even? Voting rights gutted, raging pandemic, etc etc

On the positive, a Black woman is hopefully about to be on the SC.


And you manage to work the primary into this. It is straight up weird how your heroes are never not on your mind or how you are so focused on working them into almost every convo.


Its extra amusing/hilarisad to me because just as Democrats refuse to learn lessons, so do progressives.

There is a reason your guy lost twice. To very flawed candidates at that. And it isn't because Biden made a promise to Black voters.

Pointing out that Biden didn't want to make this guarantee - and was ultimately persuaded to do it (because he was politically desperate) is simply pointing out a fact.

And yes - I don't like that he was disingenuous about it. Doesn't take away from the fact that it'll be a huge bonus for the country. If anyone deserves credit for this promise - it's Clyburn.

>And seemed to insinuate that is the only reason he won SC.
>(Which lets assume that is true, why didn't your boy do it if
>its so easy?)

That's not me insinuating it - I'm simply referring to Clyburn - who credited Biden's SC win to this promise. I actually don't think it was the only factor (obviously) - but it definitely was instrumental in lifting Biden's struggling campaign.

>I'd love to see a politician who doesn't pander, btw.

>I think it is very telling that you are perfectly okay with
>Bernie pandering to Joe Rogan fans but not Biden pandering to
>Black voters. Very telling.

lol tf? Do you always try and smear people as Rogan bros like this? It's weird. But how exactly did Bernie pander to Rogan fans?

Biden wanted to go on Joe Rogan. So did Pete and Warren. So were they pandering to Rogan fans as well?

>And you manage to work the primary into this.

The primary and Bernie were already brought up in the post. This post is about the Supreme Court. Where did Biden make his promise to appoint a Black justice? In the SC primary.

We've got people in here writing a thesis on Bernie's legacy. Guess that's cool to be dominating people's mind right now?

>There is a reason your guy lost twice. To very flawed
>candidates at that. And it isn't because Biden made a promise
>to Black voters.

To be clear - Bernie is a *very* flawed candidate - particularly in a national election in the United States. He did a lot of things wrong, and his core ethos clashes with deeply held beliefs Americans have about themselves and this country. The fact that he even made it as far as he did - with deeply impactful influence - says quite a bit about the state of America and where we're at.

But when people are out here recklessly smearing him for immature and petty reasons - I'm def going to chime in.

But I'm curious: what do you believe the primary reasons are for his loss?


-->

>Biden wanted to go on Joe Rogan. So did Pete and Warren. So
>were they pandering to Rogan fans as well?

ive corrected you on this several times.

rogan made this claim (in a convo with 'progressive' grifter now maga troll jimmy dore). biden campaign denied it. warren campaign had no idea what he was talking about. pete campaign didnt even address it (probably because it was bullshit.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/24/politics/bernie-sanders-joe-rogan-endorsement/index.html
-----
A spokesperson for the Biden campaign denied that the former vice president had sought an appearance on Rogan's show. A Warren campaign aide didn't know of any attempts to get her on the show. Buttigieg's campaign has not responded to request for comment.
-----

rogan was challenged by his own listeners to put the campaigns on blast and produce evidence of them contacting him for an appearance. and of course he never did because hes full of shit.

i consistently shit on dem strategists for incompetence and poor judgment. but even they knew a rogan appearance ranged from either backfire to pointless. of course the geniuses at the sanders campaign stepped on the rake and alienated some progressives, women, etc.

even progressive orgs like the hrc had to issue statements like this so *their* supporters didnt turn on them too.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EPFBbzZUYAIa_nk?format=png&name=medium

shit was so disastrous that the bernie campaign couldnt even come up with a response to the hrc statement.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EPGawPvWsAA1-Dp?format=jpg&name=large

i heard him mention it. I don't think it was with Jimmy Dore but it's possible.
(I only heard Dore on the show once. it was my intro to him and dude was insufferable, so every time he'd drop Dore's name as someone we should listen to it was pretty cringe)

but i did hear him on the show mention that their campaigns all contacted him, and that he wasn't interested.
I don't know if he meant pre or post bernie, because I remember bernie having to walk back touting his 'endorsement'. but even with that, this was pre-covid and even though he'd be the occasional topic of lefty outrage, Rogan wasn't seen as nearly as divisive a figure as he is now. It didn't seem beyond the pale that they would want to go on his show and try to court his audience.

i had never heard anything else about it until now

>biden campaign denied it. warren
>campaign had no idea what he was talking about. pete campaign
>didnt even address it (probably because it was bullshit.

C'mon - you've been in the game far too long to be this naive. What political benefit is there to say "yea we reached out to Rogan but they weren't interested in interviewing us." lol. There's literally zero benefit to admitting that - so of course they would say things, "we have no idea" or not address it all.

Incidentally, Trump's people reached out to Rogan as well and Rogan denied him an interview.

But this idea that it's so out of the question that Warren/Biden/Pete would want to go on Rogan is silly. Of course they'd want to expand their base in any way possible. There's a loooong ass list of lefties and Democrats who've been on Rogan.

But yea - we should chastise anyone who goes on Rogan! They are either MAGA bros or meatheads -- like Sanjay Gupta and David Sinclair.

You probably still think Rogan took "horse dewormer" too, right?

>even progressive orgs like the hrc had to issue statements
>like this so *their* supporters didnt turn on them too.
>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EPFBbzZUYAIa_nk?format=png&name=medium

lol at this little trove of pbs.twimg links you've got against Bernie. Admit it - you've got a folder on your desktop titled "Bernie Bashing.pf" - prob sent by the DCCC #AmIRite

But I'm curious - did the HRC issue this statement about Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Kevin Hart, Russell Brand, Chapelle, or anyone else? Or just when there was a political primary and the Dem power brokers wanted to smear Bernie as not just sexist, but an affront to human rights by his mere existence.

lol c'mon fam. Be better tomorrow.


-->

and we all know rogan is always on the side of the evidence of course lol.

btw the hrc is a political lobbying group. so theyre political by definition. responding to an explicit political endorsement in the middle of a political campaign. i have no idea why youd think theyd put out a statement about random celebrity appearances but ok.

im just gonna let the other weird shit you posted float away in the ether lol.

Matter fact: I'm going to write Princeton and ask that they rescind Cornell West's PhD. Surely they don't want to recognize somebody who violates human rights by appearing on the Joe Rogan podcast.

-->

and shes only been there for 2 years.

(the infrastructure deal was her and rob portman)

puts everything into perspective.

moreson than any progressive. In this post you're basically putting the BBB debacle of a failure on progressives - and *not* the Dem moderate Senators who are far more responsible.

Not surprising though - given your full court defense for Clinton/Kaine dems.

-->

_______________________________________

So she does add dimension to the court in that respect. However, Notre Dame is still an elite institution and she clerked for Scalia and essentially was appointed as a disciple of that same old Scalia brand of jurisprudence, so she's really not adding anything new to the Court.

I personally would love to see a Bison sitting on the Court - or somebody who comes from a wholly different set of personal/professional experiences -- outside of the elite clerkships and conventional jurisprudential tradition that dominates the Court.

-->

https://twitter.com/CAPAction/status/1485643677921857544

reshaping the judiciary and filling the potential sc pipeline with people from those backgrounds.

not too mention the record amount of diversity. he has already seated more black women judges in his 1st term than there were in our entire history.

once again...its an impressive record thats barely talked about.

and folks wonder why they have trouble appealing to black voters in primaries.

literally *1* black woman is about to be on the top court in the entire history of the country...and mfs act like some grave injustice is taking place.

like these candidates race is their only qualification.

like republicans didnt just confirm the least experience sc justice in the last 3 decades along with judge beer bong.

reminds me of mediocre white niggas in college who tell you that youre there because of some 'quota' even tho you got better grades than them.

>and folks wonder why they have trouble appealing to black
>voters in primaries.

Or perhaps you're referring to Buttigieg or Klobuchar here who couldn't appeal to Black voters *at all*


-->

neither had near universal national name recognition on par with trump and biden either.

i can think of someone else that did tho lol.

(and barely got more black support than tom steyer in south carolina lol)

The major factor that determined the primary was generational. Biden dominated the older, more conservative democratic demographic. Sanders won the Latino/Asian-American/Arab-American/Native American vote - by far - and he won the youth Black vote. So it's incorrect to say that he didn't appeal to a wide swath of voters. Where he struggled is with older voters - including older Black voters (especially in the South).

Biden locked that down - with a *lot* of outside help.

But let's not pretend like Biden has the patent on how to speak to Black voters.


-->

i have no idea why anyone would champion the fact that they only won an age group that made up like less than 15% of primary voters.

i mean...i guess you cant lose *every* age group right?

why are we doing this again? lol.

Explain to Amerikkka in plain terms how the court is outdated and how the GOP stole seats.

Explain there are 13 districts now, etc.


Hire Bloomberg's advertising people.


Tie it to 1/6, voting rights, and preserving democracy. Attack it urgently.


Address the democracy crisis, the pandemic, and the economy (inflation)


Instead they fucked around for a year, want us all to believe that inflation isn't a problem, and are going to raise a bunch of money off this particular seat that doesn't really help right now.


Its cool and I'm glad Breyer isn't being an asshole, but a lot of Democrat consultants and stans are getting way too hype over something that does not move the needle at all.

and def aint super energized by it to the point to significantly sway elections.

doesnt matter how much effort and education you put on it.

hillary ran on filling the supreme court seat that repubs blocked obama from filling. she literally told everyone that a repub president would seat justices who would do all the horrific shit they are doing right now.

and liberals didnt give a fuck. and now its gonna be non stop bitching, protesting, and in-fighting for the rest of our lives when we coulda just stopped it in 2016.

conservatives have been caring about the judiciary since the progressive warren court, interracial marriage (loving/va), segregation (brown/board), etc.

and the reason is pretty simple.

liberals are generally content with the way things are generally headed on race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, etc (outside of politics). society has gradually been getting 'better' over the long term (look at the racial makeup of 60s marches compared to the george floyd marches).

but conservatives have hated the non-political direction of the country for a while now and have realized the only way to attempt to stop it is to use the court as a blunt force object to obstruct and disrupt a naturally liberalizing society. the court as a forum for cultural backlash is pretty much the only thing holding the various factions of the republican party together.

republicans used to win landslide elections (reagan, nixon, etc). dems only won 1 presidential election for an almost 30 year stretch til bill clinton (and he had help from a right wing independent candidate siphoning republican votes). but now theyre platform is so unpopular and outside the center/mainstream that they can only run on culture wars and taking advantage of the most anti democratic mechanisms of our government (gerrymandering, voter suppression, electoral college, un-elected judge appointments, etc).

strangling the court fits into that and their base is motivated by it as such. our base just isnt. maybe after we get shit snatched away like abortion, civil rights, voting rights, etc then we will care and get our shit together. but i aint holding my breath.

i obviously wish it wasnt this way but it is what it is.

I'm not talking about an election cycle here.

I am talking after Biden wins. After all that shit went down. Reforming the SC should have been a huge priority. Huge.


Make it a central issue of the first 100 days...tie it to threats against Democracy, 1/6, voting, etc.

It is all connected...help people see how it is connected.


The admin/Dems fucked this up.


The GOP rammed in a SC judge AFTER PEOPLE HAD ALREADY CAST VOTES FOR PRESIDENT.

Then they refused to call Biden the rightful winner, objected to electors, etc.


Their supporters STORMED the capital. All that shit.


The GOP was splintering. Moderates furious. All eyes on the capital. I saw more than a few Trump flags disappear. etc


But rather than striking while the iron was hot, Democrats from Biden to Pelosi waxed poetic about wanting a strong GOP.

Let that sink in.


The Democrats had won! They were in the honeymoon phase, and they fumbled the message.

Turn the page. Fog lifting. Fever breaking. All that usual shit.


Strong GOP? Nah fuck that.


They should have gone for the kill. Expelled a few members of Congress. Appoint a fucking bulldog to the AG. Pass voting rights (before the gerrymandering)

And reform the court.


Tie it all together. While we are at it, the National Guard not being deployed for hours??...lets make DC a state so that doesn't happen again.


Give Bloomberg whatever he wants to get his messaging people on it because his ads fucking WORKED.


Treat 1/6 and the Trump admin like a 9/11 type even that we have to fix structurally.


Again, this was all after the election so danger of turning off "moderate GOP" etc. Hell, a few might be on board they were going to hang Romney.



Instead of striking while they could and implementing structural change that might actually help people (not to mention themselves), they played the same old song they always do and are 9 ish months away from getting slaughtered.


Anyone with half a brain knew that any major Biden initiative was DOA with that court.

Imagine if she had done this. Make it make sense.

---------------------------------------

"The world is before you and you need not take it or leave it as it was when you came in." - James Baldwin

https://twitter.com/JKastellec/status/1486397073972813824

a lot of that is the fact that dem majority senates have confirmed repub pres nominations...but repubs have not.

and a lot of that is the fact that repubs regularly rotate their own justices out for younger people and dems just hold on for dear life.

and also 2 stolen elections for repub presidents (2000 and 2016) i guess lol.

< Live Mixshow - Thurs 11PM/EST >
https://twitch.tv/djchiefone

----Mixtape Archives-----
https://soundcloud.com/djchiefone

they let biden judges sail through.

manchin already came out and said he would support a judge more liberal than him.
https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1486739215513800708

< Live Mixshow - Thurs 11PM/EST >
https://twitch.tv/djchiefone

----Mixtape Archives-----
https://soundcloud.com/djchiefone

even the supposedly sane never trumpers.

repubs who have spent the last few years trashing trump and other repubs still circle the wagons when it comes to liberal supreme court justices and remind you how bigoted they are.

they go back to blaming the politicization of the nomination process on dems trashing robert bork (even tho some republicans voted him down too). and theyre of course playing the race vs qualification card on this shit.