3. "Uh, I thought you guys don't do that" In response to Reply # 1
>and you realize you hit jackpot >that night. > >so much casual nudity. > >just guys hanging out being guys...
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
8. "wait i thought you guys don't do this?" In response to Reply # 0
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
13. "more like look at men that don't want to be looked at by other men." In response to Reply # 10
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
17. "I've read it on here plenty of times. Like when someone says gays on a" In response to Reply # 15 Tue Oct-20-15 09:54 AM by Cenario
sports team will make the straight players uncomfortable bc they will be looking at their nakedness in the locker room.
The response is usually something like "chile please, as the fuck if."
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
23. "more like look at men that don't want to be looked at by other men" In response to Reply # 22
that applies to anywhere numnuts.
A) the locker room was an example B) who said gawk...i said look.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
31. "I sure do...i never denied it tho." In response to Reply # 26
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
9. "this is a sexual violation" In response to Reply # 0 Tue Oct-20-15 09:14 AM by flipnile
"It's {their} bodies, and it should be {their} choice, and the fact that it is not {their} choice is absolutely disgusting. It is not a scandal. It is a sex crime. It is a sexual violation. It's disgusting. The law needs to be changed, and we need to change. Just because {they are} public figures, just because {they are athletes}, does not mean that {they} asked for this. Anybody who looked at those {videos}, you're perpetuating a sexual offense. You should cower with shame." (c) Jennifer Lawrence
38. "this ain't the same thing as having stolen sex pix published." In response to Reply # 12
i understand any of the players involved being upset about having pix of their ass cheeks broadcast all over the world. however, given that they were in a locker room where they know reporters and cameras can be present the players don't have the same expectation of privacy as a person who poses for a sexy selfie or even a sex pic taken by a lover.
66. "reply 9, which started this subthread" In response to Reply # 62
includes a reference to J Law's response to The Fappening. The Fappening involved the release of J Law's stolen sex pix via the Internet, among other things.
in response to #9 i said 'good try but nah'. you came back in reply #12 w/some attempt at being cute. i shot it down by referring to the controversy referenced in reply #9 which i thought you also referenced as you tried to be cute.
90. "RE: this ain't the same thing as having stolen sex pix published." In response to Reply # 38
>i understand any of the players involved being upset about >having pix of their ass cheeks broadcast all over the world. >however, given that they were in a locker room where they know >reporters and cameras can be present the players don't have >the same expectation of privacy as a person who poses for a >sexy selfie or even a sex pic taken by a lover. > >so, nice try. but...no. > >I wonder would the response be the same if a camera man just busted into the changing room of a beauty pageant without getting an ALL CLEAR from the women changing.....
You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.
91. "RE: this ain't the same thing as having stolen sex pix published." In response to Reply # 90 Tue Oct-20-15 12:00 PM by SoWhat
>>I wonder would the response be the same if a camera man just >busted into the changing room of a beauty pageant without >getting an ALL CLEAR from the women changing.....
oh i'm sure the gen pop and media would treat that situation differently.
in large part b/c the beauty pageant contestants and their representatives wouldn't have signed contracts where they agreed to allow reporters and cameras access to their dressing rooms while they dress and undress.
and i wouldn't have made a post like this one b/c boobies don't thrill me like the ass in this video thrills me.
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
18. "It's not the existence of the images, it's people looking at them..." In response to Reply # 16 Tue Oct-20-15 10:06 AM by PimpTrickGangstaClik
And even worse, celebrating them.
They had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the locker room, given that this rarely happens.
The big controversy around The Fappening was that it was argued that people shouldn't be viewing the leaked photos because the people in them didn't want to be seen like that. The viewers were violating almost to the degree of the leakers (and I agree).
Same issue here. The people in this video don't want to be seen like that. Andrew Whitworth said as much. But still people are passing the video around and celebrating the fact that he is naked in it. That is wrong
21. "I would say the airing of the video is the beginning of the violation." In response to Reply # 18
i'm assuming it went out over the air, they are liable for an fcc violation as well.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
Mike Jackson Member since Dec 11th 2008 1093 posts
Tue Oct-20-15 10:17 AM
25. "oh so this happens sometimes?" In response to Reply # 18
they saw the cameras? and the reporter?
This is similar to s stealing private movies how?
you're an idiot.
>And even worse, celebrating them. > >They had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the locker >room, given that this rarely happens. > >The big controversy around The Fappening was that it was >argued that people shouldn't be viewing the leaked photos >because the people in them didn't want to be seen like that. >The viewers were violating almost to the degree of the leakers >(and I agree). > >Same issue here. The people in this video don't want to be >seen like that. Andrew Whitworth said as much. >But still people are passing the video around and celebrating >the fact that he is naked in it. That is wrong
19. "usually the cameras don't film when dudes are naked in the background." In response to Reply # 16
so yes there was an expectation to privacy.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
32. "Just bc they see the cameras doesn't mean the cameras see them." In response to Reply # 24
Cameras are rolling in the locker room all the time but 99% of the time do not air anyone naked.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
39. "oh you are going 'the sarcasm that doesn't make any sense' route?" In response to Reply # 37
sowhat does it better
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
44. "or the cameras do record but the footage doesn't air live." In response to Reply # 19
the live part is what made this story weird.
the interview could've worked as conducted if it'd been recorded for air and the various naughty bits were edited out. and if they couldn't be edited then maybe the interview is done over again or just scrapped altogether. why they decided to air that one live puzzles and thrills me.
46. "yeah thats why i said usually." In response to Reply # 44
If they do air live, they usually announce it to the room or have the interviewee against a wall or something.
Sometimes they air the coach addressing the team as a whole and they may record live(slight delay) but its usually announced.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
45. "lmao broadcasting their nakedness is not part of the media policy" In response to Reply # 41
it actually is against it, fcc policies and general common sense.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
47. "cameras and reporters being present is part of the media policy." In response to Reply # 45
the weird part of this IMO is the live broadcasting. i dunno why the network decided to air this interview live.
i dunno if this will amount to a violation of the CBA and if there's anything actionable going on here.
and if so - i'm still thrilled that this happened.
but only slightly b/c i've seen more and better ass in other situations. hell, i watched porn w/more and better ass shortly after i saw this video for the first time. so this ain't all that much to me. i'm in it for the lulz.
49. "Right we agree that the problem is that it was aired." In response to Reply # 47
not so much that it was caught on camera. So your boy's argument above that he knew the cameras were there or your argument about the media policy is irrelevant, bc they violated it by airing it.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
56. "you need me to find where it says live broadcasting of the players nudit..." In response to Reply # 51
on tv is a violation?
lol
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
-The Knicks’ coaching search still includes a lone frontrunner, Kurt Rambis, whose qualifications for the position include a strong relationship with Jackson and a willingness to take the job.
63. "i dunno that the FCC regulates NFL Network for sexually-explicit content..." In response to Reply # 58
some cable channels regulate themselves in consideration of their advertisers who don't want to have their products associated w/violent or sexually-explicit content. but the FCC isn't involved. this is AFAIK. if you know otherwise i'm ready to read.
Q: What rules, if any, apply to sexually explicit programming?
A: Section 505 of the 1996 Act states that cable operators, or other multichannel video programming distributors who offer sexually explicit adult video programming or other programming that is indecent on any channel(s) primarily dedicated to sexually-oriented programming, must fully scramble or block both the audio and video portions of the channels so that someone who does not subscribe to the channel does not receive it. Until a multichannel video programming distributor complies with this provision, the distributor cannot provide the programming during hours of the day when a significant number of children are likely to view it.
However, Section 505 was challenged in the courts. On May 22, 2000, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Playboy Entertainment Group v. U.S., determining Section 505 unconstitutional. Therefore, the Commission's rules implementing Section 505 can not be enforced.
74. "you are correct" In response to Reply # 63 Tue Oct-20-15 11:11 AM by RobOne4
FCC does not deal with cable channels. Cable channels do employ their own standards and practices lawyers who act as an FCC to their own shows. But that is more to not lose sponsors.
November 8th, 2005 The greatest night in the history of GD!
52. "It's clear that whatever the media policy is, this was a mistake..." In response to Reply # 41
People have apologized for it. The fact that this is a story demonstrates how rare this is.
So it is reasonable to say that the people in that locker room had the expectation that they would not appear naked on national tv. One person whose ass was shown came out and make a statement about it.
Even still, you feel comfortable gawking at the images and crowing for more scenes of unwitting nakedness? That is creepy
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79607 posts
Tue Oct-20-15 10:45 AM
54. "i thought yall gay niggas didnt want special treatment? " In response to Reply # 0
that good double standard
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79607 posts
Tue Oct-20-15 10:57 AM
65. "lmao... he is showing all types of instability" In response to Reply # 61
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79607 posts
Tue Oct-20-15 10:55 AM
64. "backed into a corner and swinging like an animal" In response to Reply # 59
noice
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
69. "going all the way back to ancient Greece and beyond." In response to Reply # 67
and the dudes in the video at issue had all just participated in a game where they wore form-fitting, body-hugging tights over jock straps in front of thousands of spectators knowing their images could be broadcast live to an audience of millions.
of course, that's not the same as having their naked buttocks broadcast live for thousands. and later published on the Internet for an audience of millions. for posterity. no pun.
so i feel the dudes feeling some kinda way. and i don't care much b/c i like ass.
75. "Please post entire quotes " In response to Reply # 73
"It doesn't bother me personally," said Whitworth, as reported by Local 18's Joe Danneman. "But, as a guy who has always been against this policy (allowing reporters into NFL locker rooms), I think it's a great example why the open media room policy is old and needs to change."
being seen naked does not bother him but its STILL an invasion of privacy. As an individual he has that right.
the remainder of the quote didn't address whether Whitworth felt violated. and the part you quoted doesn't contradict Whitworth's statement about not being personally bothered nor does it confirm your position that he felt violated.
>being seen naked does not bother him but its STILL an invasion >of privacy. As an individual he has that right. > >you saying he doesnt?
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
legsdiamond Member since May 05th 2011 79607 posts
Wed Oct-21-15 05:53 AM
100. "Wanted more booty^^^" In response to Reply # 99
**************** TBH the fact that you're even a mod here fits squarely within Jag's narrative of OK-sanctioned aggression, bullying, and toxicity. *shrug*
Printer-friendly copy 
Email this topic to a friend
General Discussion
