If you really wanna go deeper down the Adnan rabbit hole, there's a whole new podcast about the case.
The podcast is done by Rabia Chaudry (the person who originally reached out to Sarah Koenig) and two other lawyers working for Syed.
I'm only on the first episode, but the podcast is paid for by an group of people who support Adnan, and the point of the podcast isn't to weave a tale like Serial did, but to just pour over the evidence of the case to determine where the inconsistencies lay and how that might help or harm Adnan.
I'm giving it a chance to see how interesting it can be and what these lawyers might actually discover. It seems as though they are hinting that there's a lot of evidence and procedure issues wrong with the case.
2. "understood. however, in the very first episode..." In response to Reply # 1
these lawyers have produced testimony that likely would have exonerated Adnan. it didn't because the first trial where we heard this testimony was a mistrial, but the witness was very confident (and this was a PROSECUTION witness). in the second trial, now this prosecution witness can't remember...wonder why she was so sure but then couldn't remember.
so, despite their bias, I am finding this interesting
i listened to all the available eps and while i understand you can take a certain set of facts and use them to paint various pictures, these lawyers have seemingly disproved more than a handful of events that the State built its case on already. they've proved that the detectives assigned to the case led witnesses to conclusions that helped the police/prosecution.
Printer-friendly copy 
Email this topic to a friend
General Discussion
