we could go into the mass-migration into the land now known as Israel, or the creation of the migrants' own state, displacing people who were already there

BUT

assuming Israel has a "right to exist"

I'm especially curious how people square "stop the illegals from entering our country" with the constant illegal creation of ENTIRE SETTLEMENTS in someone else's borders as their drawn today

And might makes right.

**********
"Everyone has a plan until you punch them in the face. Then they don't have a plan anymore." (c) Mike Tyson


"One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand described as 'that ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether you're

Been there from the beginning so looking for moral integrity in the political philosophy of most isn't gonna happen


does it really matter?

wonder what bin's doing?
http://i.imgur.com/phECCMp.jpg

once the baby is actually born


the christian conservatives are not the
open-carry border protectors who are not the
AIPAC money lobby who are not the
free market deregulators.


which is why numbers-wise GOP would lose every state/national election, except they know how to rig the game and the dems are morons who dont know how to play the game

)))--####---###--(((

bunda
<-.-> ^_^ \^0^/
get busy living, or get busy dying.

as they please

>we could go into the mass-migration into the land now known
>as Israel, or the creation of the migrants' own state,
>displacing people who were already there
>
>BUT
>
>assuming Israel has a "right to exist"
>
>I'm especially curious how people square "stop the illegals
>from entering our country" with the constant illegal creation
>of ENTIRE SETTLEMENTS in someone else's borders as their drawn
>today

(a) How is it inconsistent to have a certain stance on illegal immigration and another entirely separate stance on another country's sovereignty?

(b) Why are either of those positions considered conservative stances in the first place? Support for Israel is bipartisan. Opposition to illegal immigration is bipartisan. I don't get it either, but those are the facts.

>we could go into the mass-migration into the land now known
>as Israel, or the creation of the migrants' own state,
>displacing people who were already there
>
>BUT
>
>assuming Israel has a "right to exist"
>
>I'm especially curious how people square "stop the illegals
>from entering our country" with the constant illegal creation
>of ENTIRE SETTLEMENTS in someone else's borders as their drawn
>today