Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Lobby General Discussion topic #12747433

Subject: "How The Sugar Industry Gamed The Government" Previous topic | Next topic
neuro_OSX
Member since Oct 29th 2004
1157 posts
Tue Mar-10-15 06:22 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"How The Sugar Industry Gamed The Government"


  

          

I would argue it was the sugar industry that was behind the low fat craze that started a few years ago. There is no "fat" industry, fat has no lobbyists, but the sugar industry has an army of lobbyists, deep pockets and receives huge subsidies
from the government.




http://time.com/3738706/the-sugar-industry-shaped-government-advice-on-cavities-report-finds/


www.vocativ.com/culture/science/sugar-industry-government-nidr/


The federal government was in bed with the sugar industry throughout the late 1960s and early 70s, according to a new study of more than 1,500 pages of correspondence between sugar executives and researchers at the U.S. National Institute of Dental Research (NIDR). These “Sugar Papers” show that all but one member of the government task force on tooth decay also sat on the sugar industry’s expert panel, and that 78 percent of industry recommendations crept into the 1971 National Caries Program.

“These tactics are strikingly similar to what we saw in the tobacco industry in the same era,” says Stanton A. Glantz, an anti-tobacco activist and researcher at UC San Francisco, who coauthored the paper. “Our findings are a wake-up call for government officials…to understand that the sugar industry, like the tobacco industry, seeks to protect profits over public health.”

The sugar industry already knew its product caused tooth decay as of 1950. But instead of tackling the problem head on, industry researchers churned out a flurry of pseudo-scientific recommendations that called for more fluoridated water and better dental fillings—anything but a reduction in sugar intake.

In October 1969, the NIDR formed a task force to create a list of priorities for preventing dental cavities. Scientists on the task force agreed that sugary foods were the root of the problem, and initially recommended Americans cut back on sugar to prevent tooth decay. But the sugar industry convened its own panel just weeks later, which included all but one member of the NIDR task force.

Predictably, the industry panel did not recommend cutting back on sugar. So when the industry sent its proposal to the NIDR—in effect, submitting recommendations to itself—the NIDR buckled. And the government’s landmark National Caries Program, intended to avert tooth decay in 1971, never even mentions that we should eat less sugar.

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top


Topic Outline
Subject Author Message Date ID
not sure about allathis...
Mar 10th 2015
1

PoppaGeorge
Member since Nov 07th 2004
10384 posts
Tue Mar-10-15 10:01 PM

Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
1. "not sure about allathis..."
In response to Reply # 0


  

          

'cause growing up in the 70's all we would hear in school and whatnot was to eat less sugar to prevent tooth decay. It was all about eating less candy, sugary cereals, and consuming less pop.

By the time the 80's rolled around we had all manner of anti-sugar material for preventing tooth decay.


---------------------------

forcing myself to actually respond to you is like bathing in ebola virus. - Binlahab

Like there is stupid, and then there is you, and then there is dead. - VAsBestBBW

R.I.P. Disco D

  

Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote | Top

Lobby General Discussion topic #12747433 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.25
Copyright © DCScripts.com