Is there ANY news about a new James Bond movie?

Casino Royale has been watched too many times now.

Not much news, but I found this bit from www.411mania.com/movies/news/

French actor Mathieu Amalric (Munich) has apparently been cast as the villain in Bond 22. FOXNews.com reports that an official announcement will be made soon.

While plot details remain under wraps, Casino Royale actress Eva Green previously hinted that the villain of the next James Bond movie would be the boyfriend of her character Vesper Lynd.

I didn't know it was actually going to be titled Bond 22, or this could be a working title.

Found a little more info, Thank you:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0830515/

http://movies.ign.com/objects/826/826378.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bond_22

I'll go double or nothing on my student loans that it won't be called Bond 22. Call it a hunch.

______________________________
PSN: RuptureMD
http://hospitalstories.wordpress.com/

The 4th Annual Residency Encampment: Where do we go from here?

All you see is crime in the source code.

Great Bond website here: http://www.mi6.co.uk/mi6.php3

http://commanderbond.net/

the movie is still slated for november 2008. sony mentioned that the writer's strike isn't expected to delay bond 22.

i believe the casting process has already begun for the bond ladies as well.

oh and judy dench is said to be headed for panama to begin filming for the role of "m".
-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/

http://fuck-your.blogspot.com
http://www.myspace.com/insightclopediabrown
http://www.myspace.com/dumhi
http://www.youtube.com/group/okayplayer
http://www.last.fm/user/DawgEatah
R.I.P. 3rd i

Bond 22
Iron-Man
Dark Knight

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valkyrie_(film)

stick a fork in it. It's a lost cause.

_
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4TztqYaemt0
http://preptimeposse.blogspot.com/

Although nothing he has directed shows he can do action.

are on board the 2nd unit team. I'm actually more concerned with the more dramatic aspects of the film. The overall plot, tone and villain are most likely what will determine how good this is. Action is rarely a problem for Bond. Almost everyone involved has worked on multiple Bond films.
-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/

...in some ways.




http://fuck-your.blogspot.com
http://www.myspace.com/insightclopediabrown
http://www.myspace.com/dumhi
http://www.youtube.com/group/okayplayer
http://www.last.fm/user/Dawgeatah

and it's pretty forgettable. It could have been far, far funnier and livelier too. He's a dull by the numbers director with little imagination who has produced nothing but overly safe stale work since he broke out with the laughable Monsters Ball.

Bond 22 will probably be as memorable as Tomorrow Never Dies unless some X factor saves it.

_
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4TztqYaemt0
http://preptimeposse.blogspot.com/

Brosnan was far too PC in most of his films Bond and rarely very menacing. Craig manages to deliver almost everything with an appropriate lever of conviction, sarcasm, innuendo, or menace.

Dude plays the role like he could choke the life out of you with his bare hands.
-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/sets/

And I'm speaking as a big fan of Will Ferrell, Emma Thompson, Dustin Hoffman, Marc Forster, and those meta-flicks in general.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

Pics

http://bp3.blogger.com/_wWtTeuD10x4/RvLL4QLiSSI/AAAAAAAAB8I/KC4LOAYYAgs/s1600-h/56467_Olga_Kurylenko_mix0007_122_943lo.jpg

http://bp2.blogger.com/_wWtTeuD10x4/RvLM9ALiSYI/AAAAAAAAB84/dV4zz7hG5n4/s1600-h/56476_Olga_Kurylenko_mix0006_122_1100lo.jpg

http://bp3.blogger.com/_wWtTeuD10x4/RvLMbQLiSUI/AAAAAAAAB8Y/SrmX6Uklso0/s1600-h/56440_Olga_Kurylenko_mix0002_122_8lo.jpg

http://img118.imageshack.us/img118/4208/02008s4ip.jpg



http://commanderbond.net/article/4770

According to trade paper Variety, Ukranian actress Olga Kurylenko has been cast as the female lead girl in the newest James Bond film, the still untitled Bond 22. According to the official press release, Kurylenko will be playing the role of Camille, who ‘challenges Bond and helps him come to terms with the emotional consequences of Vesper’s betrayal.’

Kurylenko, born in 1979 in Berdyansk, former USSR, recently co-starred in Hitman and with Elijah Wood in a segment for Paris, je t’aime. She began her film career in France in 2005. She received the certificate of excellence award at the 2006 Brooklyn International Film Festival for her performance in L’Annulaire.

So far, it has been reported that Eon Productions was looking for a Latino-style Bond girl. It is not known whether these plans were rejected or whether Kurylenko is going to play a South American character.

The pics on the rotten tomatoes site I saw yesterday were NOT doin her justice.

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20169700,00.html

----
NBA MOCK DRAFT #1 - https://thecourierclass.com/whole-shebang/2017/5/18/2017-nba-mock-draft-1-just-lotto-and-lotta-trades

based on the images i've seen of her.
-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=506572&in_page_id=1773

----
NBA MOCK DRAFT #1 - https://thecourierclass.com/whole-shebang/2017/5/18/2017-nba-mock-draft-1-just-lotto-and-lotta-trades

She's looking good.

********************************

Get Out The Room!
http://getouttheroom.podomatic.com
@fakewilliamkatt

"You probably wouldn't worry about what people think of you if you could know how seldom they do!" - Olin Miller

Somehow, Haggis will be blamed for this.

>New Bond Film Titled 'Quantum of Solace'
Jan. 24, 2008, 9:47 AM EST

The Associated Press

IVER HEATH, England (AP) -- "Quantum of Solace" is the title of the new James Bond film, the 22nd Bond adventure.

The title was revealed to reporters Thursday at Pinewood Studios outside of London, where the movie is being filmed.

Producer Michael G. Wilson said the title, chosen only a few days ago, was taken from a story by Bond creator Ian Fleming that appears in the collection "For Your Eyes Only."

"We thought it was an intriguing title and referenced what happened to Bond and what is happening in the film," he said.

Daniel Craig is returning as Agent 007. He picks up where 2006's "Casino Royale" left off, with Bond contemplating revenge after his betrayal by his true love, Vesper Lynd.

"It is not a revenge movie," said co-producer Barbara Broccoli. "It's a lot more complicated than that. It has lots of action but it also deals with the inner turmoil Bond is feeling."

Filming began at Pinewood Studios earlier this month. Location shooting is planned in Austria, Italy and Panama. Judi Dench returns as the MI-6 boss M and Mathieu Amalric ("The Diving Bell and the Butterfly") plays the villain. Additions to the cast include Ukrainian actress Olga Kurylenko as mysterious Bond girl Camille.

"Quantum of Solace" is set to open in Britain and the United States on Nov. 7.
_____________________________________________________________________
Magnificent Trident

Well, at least jonz'll be happy waiting in the spring (Iron Man) and summer (Dark Knight)

________________________________________________________________________
Magnificent Trident

Wasn't sure which thread to post this on Zoo so I did it on both. Feel free to lock 1 of em tho. Not that you needed my 'mission of course.

....after seeing the trailer and getting a good feeling from it, I can surely say that I can't wait to catch it. Casino Royale and now Quantum are the first time I've anticipated a Bond film in a long time. Before these two, I haven't had the urge to peep a Bond flick since the 80's.


------------------------------
Avatar: I can't wait

http://afrojacks.com/images/segal.gif

Check out summa dis artwork AND NEW PICS:
http://www.myspace.com/sirapexthegreatest

Check out the other Dumhipod pics here: http://viewmorepics.myspac

_____

I don't even like people that act like me

--sean P

http://defamer.com/5066132/james-bond-curse-extends-to-early-quantum-of-solace-reviews

Marc Forster's final a-list project? I hope so.

_
http://youtube.com/watch?v=4TztqYaemt0
http://preptimeposse.blogspot.com/

sounds good.

First, Quantum of Solace is NOT the typical Bond movie. For better or worse, Marc Forster has made his mark on the franchise. I see Quantum of Solace as bringing the story of Casino Royale full circle (as evidenced by what you will see at the very end). If Casino Royale was Bond's version of Batman Begins, Quantum of Solace is the Dark Knight. Bond is a bit more experienced, but is still making mistakes and has to understand the consequences of his actions before he becomes the nearly perfect 007. I say this in the sense that things get worse for the character of Bond before they get better. Craig's Bond is not the suave Sean Connery. But there are touches of that Bond in QoS and I believe the film moves closer to the Bond that everyone seems to be so familiar with (or at least by the end). Remember, this Bond is fresh out of the military and a newly appointed agent with 00 Status.

I do believe a few things could have been done differently in Quantum of Solace, but I really enjoyed the film. I found myself on the edge of my seat at several moments (at one point, I had to remind myself to breathe.) As Daniel Craig stated in an interview...if the sequences look painful, they sure as fuck were. The movie moves at rapid pace, and may be a bit difficult for some to follow at times due to Dan Bradley's 2nd unit direction (Bourne haters beware). You really have to pay attention.

Judi Dench, Giancarlo Giannini, Jeffrey Wright, and Mathieu Amalric were spot on. Everyone got a bit more shine than usual, and Mathieu Amalric was a very creepy villain without being way over the top.

I really don't want to post any real spoilers unless asked, but I will tell you that you will not see Q, MoneyPenny, gadgets, or any ridiculous jokes. For those that pay attention, you will notice a few clever nods to past films and overall Bond tradition. On the other hand, we do get a darker sense of humor, an arrogance that consistently pisses off the villain, fantastic exotic locales, Felix Leiter, and a Bond that uses everything at his disposal to get the job done (contrary to belief, Sean Connery's Bond did this long before Matt Damon had done this in the Bourne series).

As I said before...this is not your typical Bond movie, but I would argue that it is STILL Bond. Many critics have called it a great action movie, just not a great Bond film. They fail to see that there is actually more to the franchise than just jokes, and gadgets. The franchise has changed throughout its history. A nearly 50 year old franchise needs to mix things up from time to time if its going to survive.
-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/sets/

terrible

-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/sets/

-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/sets/

have connections in the film industry.
-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/sets/

Review coming on Monday!

One.

http://bastardswordsman.tumblr.com/
http://bloggerhouse.net/
http://poisonousparagraphs.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/Dart_Adams

it was enjoyable enough

daniel craig is a great fucking bond

some of the technology was a bit OTT

my friends didn't like it quite as much as casino royale

*shrug*

i liked it.

i doubt it will leave anyone indifferent.
-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/sets/

http://i33.tinypic.com/fw3jab.jpg

unless you're a *really* big fan of the movie, i'd say it's not worth repurchasing if you already have the first version

if you don't own it all, it's a no-brainer

so my opinion is moot on the bonus features

i'd recommend watching casino royale immediately before going though. it would help

Might have less character analysis, but it's a swift 2 hours of action, Craig and Dench have great chemistry, the new girl is appropriately hot, Diving Bell and the Butterfly is a very creepy villain, and it's full of one-liners, awesome stunts, and everything I want in a Bond movie.

This transformation into "Bond is a blunt object" works very well imo. No sequence tops the opening scene in Casino Royale, but many rival it, and the action is non-stop.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

___________________

Mar-A-Lago delenda est

Very brisk pace. Geoffrey Wright needs more screentime, but the way he played it was perfect, understated as hell. Daniel Craig took it to another level. Judi Dench is the best M. Action, action, action. Outside of the shaky camera stuff, this was top notch.

...was too shaky cam for me. I couldn't tell what the fuck was happening, which was a shame, cuz there appeared to be some cool explosions and stunts going on. Aside from that first sequence though, the rest of the action was steady enough for me to dig it.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

>...was too shaky cam for me. I couldn't tell what the fuck
>was happening, which was a shame, cuz there appeared to be
>some cool explosions and stunts going on. Aside from that
>first sequence though, the rest of the action was steady
>enough for me to dig it.

I thought I was just sitting too close to the screen but I heard other people complaining about that as well. They had a bunch of those Aston Martins out in the parking lot at the screening I attended last night & those cars are pretty sick. They even revved one up & told us it could push about 185 but wouldn't let me take the wheel to try it.

I'll be mad if they were in the Cinerama lot and I missed it.

>I'll be mad if they were in the Cinerama lot and I missed
>it.

They might still be there tonight since this is the official opening.

he's on some shit like "bond films should be bond films, not bourne films; leave those for bourne."

i'm still going to see this tonight tho..

----

The "he's taking over water in Bolivia! Oooooooh! Noooooo!" part. I LOLed hard.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

its a pretty big deal all over the world and theres a lot of money in it so i thought it was a nice unexpected twist they threw in there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZC1LafSxAk

_________________________

I just watched Casino Royale last night and I already have my QOS tickets for the 9:15 showing tonight!

To all my Seattle okp's, since IMAX didn't pick this up, this is a must see at the newly refurbished Cinerama. Brand new seats & floors. Comfy as fuck.

Great opening scene. Daniel Craig is a relentless bad ass Bond & I hope he keeps the role for a very long time. Mathieu Amalric is understated as the villain but does a great job just the same. His eyes & voice are creepy enough alone.

I thought they did a decent job combining the Casino Royale elements and also trying to make Quantam of Solace stand as a story of its own as well but the script still wasn't as tight as it could've been imo. The Bond & Batman reboots are following similar paths in that matter & several others. I'm interested to see the original/alternate ending once the DVD is released tho. I'm also interested to see whether or not the next director decides to follow up on the ending we didn't get to see & decides to make this a trilogy. For those who don't know what I'm talking about it's discussed here & obviously could be considered a spoiler:

http://theentertainmenthotline.net/2008/10/27/quantum-of-solace-dvd-deleted-scene-details-revealed/

Overall tho, great action sequences by land, air & sea. Still felt like a Bond movie to me despite the lack of catchpharses & gadgets. The new catchphrase that's better left unsaid is "Ass, Bad ass"

oh shit i'm there. i haven't been there for a while because imax was getting a lot of good movies.

GamerTag and PSN: PokeEmAll

>oh shit i'm there. i haven't been there for a while because
>imax was getting a lot of good movies.

Yeah I never saw The Dark Knight there even tho I meant to but IMAX more than made up for it.

i really want to see this

-----------------------------------------------------------------

I have yet to read Ebert's review, but I imagine I share the same sentiments regarding Bond movies vs. Bourne movies

I like Daniel Craig a lot as Bond, and hopefully the next time out there will be more fun to be had besides the witty mother-son exchanges between he and Dame Judi Dench...

"No Homo" or whatever, but it would be nice to see this dude, who's so hot with the wimmins in real life (if I hear one more woman talk about how Daniel Craig "could get it," I'm going to shoot myself), get a little more action on screen than kissing a woman's back (I'm talking this movie only, I don't care about "but but but he boned Vesper at the 1 hour, 6 minute mark of Casino Royale")

The ladies were suitably hot, and I liked the fact that Bond didn't judge ol' girl for how she got down

That opening was confusing and only made me think of the car chase at the end of Bourne Supremacy

I suppose that we should be grateful that we don't have another 2.5 hour Bond epic to have to sit through, but this one still felt really short at 1:45, including the opening titles

(btw, the Jack White/Alicia Keys song isn't bad, per se, but it could use more bottom, more bass of some sort)

ALSO DON'T SAVE THE FUCKING TRADITIONAL OPENING FOR THE END

See, ^'s the kind of shit I'm talking about when I express dismay at this "gritty new Bond direction." They're too busy stripping away the BOND trappings in order to stay "relevant"... "hey, let's just JUMP RIGHT INTO the action, fuck Daniel Craig shooting at us in a tux"... "see, y'all, it's not the Same Old Bond!"... "but then we'll go and put in a PRETTY BLATANT Goldfinger homage."

Cmon, EON Productions, you can't have it both ways. Either go whole hog with this Stone Cold James Bond, a cat who can whoop ass and kill at will like Ice Cube, drink drinks with lemon twists (?), has verbal jousts with his mum-esque boss, and only bangs out one woman per movie, or just forget it... we don't need the "nods" to previous Bond films just to satisfy the "old heads"...

All that said, I still enjoyed myself, lol...
________________________________________________________________________
<------ That's it, that's all.

i saw the movie as whut it meant to be, an evolution to the james bond we traditionally love....hence the traditional opening at the every end.

i mean, it wouldn't make sense to jump off to the bond we know as the aftermath of casino royale...

bother.

Is it at all possible to understand "whut it was meant to be," and still discuss your issues with it?
________________________________________________________________________
<------ That's it, that's all.

so why are you complaining about this? the way CR started was atypical for any BOND FILM...but we all understood that it was about HOW he got 00-status

this film is a continuation of the last film and the evolution of how the bond we know today. you cannot come in thinking this character is back to his old self after whut happened to vesper and this movie deals with how he moved on and learned from that experience. the end symbolizes that.

It's not as over-the-top as some of the Bond openings but it's still a edge-of-your-seat action scene that no mere mortal could ever really pull off. I thought that was a great way to introduce the 21st century Bond.

QOS's opening scene was just bad. It was a random car chase that was poorly edited and was basically on par with your typical action movie car chase. On top of that, Bond didn't really save himself as much as he was saved by some of the worst machine gun work the cinema has seen since the Rambo movies.

That's basically the difference between the two movies: Casino Royale was 21st century Bond, Quantum of Solace was a slightly above-average action film with a couple of Bond-ish moments thrown in.

----
NBA MOCK DRAFT #1 - https://thecourierclass.com/whole-shebang/2017/5/18/2017-nba-mock-draft-1-just-lotto-and-lotta-trades

opening was better suited at the end for this movie. these last two movies are attempting to show bond's evolution.

bond is being depicted as the blunt instrument. he's got to learn from his mistakes. all of the times m lectured him for killing people too soon and not seeing the big picture lends to that idea. we see bond's progression at the end.

hopefully, the follow-up includes the traditional opening with the stand-alone mini-mission.
-------------------------------------------
Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chaidealo/sets/

...the way Kill Bill Vol. 2 was a continuation. I think they'll go back to him bangin chicks in the next flick, they were just finishing the loose ends left from the first flick. When I think of it in that regard, it bothers me less that he wasn't smashin chicks left and right here.

And regarding the length, I DEFINITELY think we should be grateful it wasn't another 2h30 epic, lol.

My movies: http://russellhainline.com
My movie reviews: https://letterboxd.com/RussellHFilm/
My beer TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@thebeertravelguide

it think the Bond we'll see in the next film will be more of what we're used to seeing because he's developed in this two films into the suave Bond we know.

He's done with all the trivial shit, revenge killings and is starting to become the professional spy, saying "lets get at these hoes" dude we know.

SPOILERS
Him not killing Dominic (directly at least) or Vesper's ex was him changing drastically and moving on from the childish shit he's been doing. That why M was so much like a mom these last two movies but I doubt it'll be such a mother-son relationship next time around

https://twitter.com/chuck4prez

>I think
>they'll go back to him bangin chicks in the next flick,

a better looking bond

or it's just not believable

~~~~
When you are born, you cry, and the world rejoices. Live so that when you die, you rejoice, and the world cries.
~~~~

better yet, seen some of the baddest chicks with those broke-ass rougeish cats with confidence?

I'm not saying he's good or bad looking

I'm just saying ALL the women are loving this new Bond

>I'm just saying ALL the women are loving this new Bond



i shall denounce your falsehood for all womanhood
for #1 i am a woman
i ain't lovin dude
he aiight
#2 most women i know ain't lovin him
again he aiight

good thing the body is kinda tight cause the face is a no go


and yes i have seen the dude supermodels go out with
it's a varied type depending on the woman

and this STILL give no excuse for this choppy faced dude
taking the ONE ROLE IN HOLLYWOOD SET EXCLUSIVELY FOR HANDSOME DUDES


odl dudes can take all the other roles
the bond role was built on the characters looks
period


now run along

~~~~
When you are born, you cry, and the world rejoices. Live so that when you die, you rejoice, and the world cries.
~~~~

Mebbe you and your clan aren't into him. Fine, diff'rent strokes.

But women in general are going bananas over Daniel Craig. I can't believe you're disputing this on the grounds that you have a vagina.

...says Wrongthink

Real talk: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12JJv6yCk7Q

Current Rotation:

Shad - TSOL
Onra - Long Distance
Cool Kids - Tacklebox
Shabazz Palaces