|
>1) Superman is gone for 5 joints. In the first film, it took >3 years to get from Krypton to Earth, and he aged from an >infant to a toddler. > >3 years to Krypton + time to explore and study shit + 3 years >from Krypton != 5 years. FUZZY MATH.
well, consider that was a baby on a preset and predetermikned flight path to make SURE the kid lands safely. flying the thing... it's reasonable to believe that he could simply pilot the thing at a higher speed. basically, the kid like about 6 years old in the first movie anyways, cause he sure as hell didnt LOOK 3, so we could just go nitpick that while we're at it. oh and lets nitpick the fact that nobody in any incarnation of the franchise cant put two and two together and realize clark kent and superman are identical, or that his coworkers never notice he is never around when superman is working?
>2) Martha Kent has moved on and found a new dude (Bul leaving >the house before Supes arrives home). This was shot, but >totally cut from the theatrical print. Why? BAD EDITS.
ok this is a bit MUCH, even for self professed nitpicking... this has zero effect on anything, honestly.
>3) No mention of the 3 Phantom Zone Kryptonians.
>Lester's version of Superman II has Zod and 'nem fall into a >hole at the FOS, while Donner's version has them depowered and >arrested. Neither of this is even hinted at or mentioned. >AROO?
why mention them? they werent at all vital to this story, so why waste precious time explaining it. perhaps a toungue in cheek refference would be nice, but remember it's LOOSELY based on the first two, not precisely. this has no bearing on the current film.
>4) Luthor is complicit in a terrorist attack on the White >House and leads Zod and his crew to destroy major portions of >Metropolis... but manages to walk off as a free man cause >Superman missed his court date? GTFOOH.
shit like this happens on our court systems all the time, it's not THAT outlandish, and besides, you are watching a movie about an alien who comes to earth and spends his spare time saving everyone instead of taking over the place like he easily could. lets lament the governments lack of trying to take him down their damn selves, cause he would be considered a major threat to our civilization in "real" life. the point being, its a comic book movie, lets not ruin it for ourselves by overthinking the lack of "realism".
>5) I'm just letting my brain fill in this mystery. Superman >depowers himself so he can do the hibby-dibby with Lois. (with >no super condom!) Later, I'm guessing his depowered Supersperm >is still swimming around at the time that Superman flips the >depowering chamber. Maybe it depowered Zod and friends, but it >re-powered the Superskeet?
my guess is that his dna would still be the same, simply hybernating. remember, mom said he wouldnt be able to come back after that, so once again we could nitpick the original source even further its lack of logic.
>Now, this kid is here. I'm supposing the amnesia kiss didn't >work, cause Lois seems to know that the kid is Superman's... >Isn't that what she whispered in his ear at the hospital?
again, "loosley based" around the first two films.
>6) Why is the kid extra weak? That is just never explained.
he is only half kryptonian, thus he is the first and only of his kind. it would make sense that he wouldnt be all that strong especially as a child. he was able to muster the strength for a brief moment with the Flying Piano of Doom. >7) Why were Lex's henchmen not given personalities? Why were >they killed so shittily?
cause noody is all that concerned about the hencmen in movies. i am disapointed that kal penn didnt have any lines, but it didnt bother me all that much. >8) Wouldn't moving a small island frm the Earth's crust and >into it's orbit REALLY fuck up things on the planet? COME ON. cmic... book... movie...
i suppose you believe that spinning the earth backwards would take us back in time, or that it wouldnt seriously fuck up the entire solar system at the same time even if it DID? do you believe that the moon would have magically moved with the earth and gone backwards as well? you dont think that something like that would be beyond catastrophic? once again we can look back to the beloved originals for some even more screwed up logic.... but its a comic book movie in a world that clearly sint necessarily governed by our rules, so why wste energy complaining about the lack of realism? do you know any superpowered the same chick over and over again even though she treats his alter ego like shit?
>All in all, I think Byran Singer's hard-on for the character >totally overpowered his common sense in developing a sensible >story, or a satisfying ending, or an intriguing setup for the >NEXT movie... but the film does look great.
eh... its fine either way. they dont have to specifically set up the next with this one. they can still draw points from this one when its time to make the sequel. its not that big a deal.
|