|
And there is plenty of American animation of the last ten years that does not suck. Off the top of my head:
Lilo & Stitch. The Emperor's New Groove. (pretty much any Disney movie has great animation, even if it has a shitty story) The Incredibles. Monsters, Inc. The Iron Giant. Cats Don't Dance.
That's on an animation-quality basis. If we go into content, then we have the whole "Simpsons"/"Family Guy"/"Robot Chicken"/etc. group to place up on pedestals. And at one time, Steven Speilberg was twisting arms in order to get high-quality shows like "Tiny Toons", "animaniacs", and "Freakazoid" on the air.
Besides, why compare a direct-to-video kids' superhero/action movie with a high-budget anime series "Ghost in the Shell"? That's like comparing "The Cheetah Girls" to "Citizen Kane". Much American animation is of low visual quality because:
a) Animation is expensive. Especially on TV budgets. Japanese TV animation budgets tend to somehow be more manageable.
b) 95% of the animation is done in Korea, the Phillipeenes, Japan, India; pretty much anywhere that is not here, in sweatshop-like production houses that are more concerned with turning out footage than making works of quality.
c) American animation is an offshoot of live-action filmmaking, meaning it is based on fluid moevement. To save money, movement is taken out, and the result is a cheap appearance. Japanese animation has its roots in manga, and is therefor more based in static shots and intricate design. There's very little actual animation in most anime, but it looks good because the designs can withstand the twenty-minute frame holds that often appear in anime.
d) the average American consumer doesn't appear to give a shit.
|