|
>>"Ignorance is a huge part of >>racism, probably the biggest part, >>but it's not everything."
>in the case of a person >without color saying "thats ghetto", >would you say that the >person has misunderstood or does >not grasp the implications of >the phrase and that by >explaining the meaning they would >change or refrain?
Ha. That's another thing. I don't have to explain that recognizing ignorance is not the same as remedying it. But I can say that alerting someone to the implications of their common speech often has (in my experience) a significant effect on his/her thinking about the way they speak (sometimes just a temporary one, though).
>>"this development in our language is >>indicative of deep ignorance within >>majority culture"
>due to the varying status of >the speaker i think it >would be difficult to site >a uniform intention behind the >use of the phrase ,
True. I was trying to restrict it to the common, middle/upper-middle class white majority usage of the phrase, but even then...
>However i >wonder what you refer to >by the phrase "deep ignorance"? > i write this because >i am hesistant about racism >being considered a misunderstanding that >can be alleviated by consciousness >or the Truth.
Good point. Obviously, I'd be hesitant about that too. But keep in mind, I was still talking about "ignorance" and not "racism." I don't think racism can/should ever be considered a "misunderstanding." Ignorance, on the other hand, can certainly be combatted with education. It's not always successful, but one of the differences between "deep ignorance" and "racism" is that racism implies beliefs and feelings beyond surface awareness, whereas ignorance (however deep), is still just a matter of inexperience/sheltered life.
Alek
________________________________ "Say some shit that suprise me... My face don't change."
____________________________ LEFT side of the bedroom, fool! What? What?
|