|
>ARE YOU WHITE? No one is >bitching or whining and the >thread was obviously not that >half-baked, it's gotten more replies >then most of the ones >on here the first place >here.
@Why does it matter if I am white or not? And the number of responses doesn't necessarily determine whether or not a post is half-baked, especially when someone can post "white people shouldn't listen to hip-hop" or "Light skinned girls are bitches" and get 80 responses telling him/her he/she's a moron.
All I >wanted was intelligent discussion. >Responses replete with sarcasm and >insutlts does not bode well >as an example of your >ability to engage in intelligent >discourse. . .leave the personal >shyt out of it. >You'd think I personally attacked >you or something. I >just wanted to try my >hand out at a Activist >for a change. . .is >that alright with you?
@Who said it was personal? You said my shit was flawed, I said your shit was half-baked. I don't remember calling you a bitch or anything. Refresh my memory if you will, but just because I attack your argument doesn't mean I'm trying to assassinate your character. I didn't take anything you said personal. And for another thing, why in the world would you think you need my permission to post in Okay Activist? Or, were you being sarcastic and thereby showing what you call a lack of ability to participate in intelligent discussion........
>Anyway, listen, I hear what you're >saying and YOUR'E STILL WRONG >(or at the very least >I disagree). . .I got >it the first time. . >.your argument was just wack. > Mentioning Tiger, Venus & >Serena in your original response >was just as useless as >mentioning MJ. They are >ALL at the absolute top >of their game and can't >be fucked with by any >race, black, white, red, purple >or green!
I'm not sure if you've heard the word "satire" before. From your responses to my thread the concept does seem a bit foreign to you. See, being that my response was what we call satire, I don't actually believe Michael Jordan should be ashamed of himself for succeeding in a white sport, nor do I think Tiger Woods should retire. I was hoping that the suggestion of inserting Vince Carter instead of MJ in my original post would help clarify things for you. Apparently not, because you're still wasting energy on attacking what you think is an analogy but was really more of a parody. Hyperbole can also be a part of satire, as in "A Modest Proposal" and even "Doonesbury". I mean, I hope you didn't think that the creators of those works actually advocated child abuse and thought that the President of a certain time period were invisible. It was more that the usage of this vehicle poked fun at an underlying, real flaw in the subject of the satire Ergo, Tiger and MJ can be looked at as part of the hyperbole I employed while typing the satire. The underlying flaw in your argument is where you state your indignance that, although Em has undeniable skill, you take umbrage with the fact he is successful from a sales standpoint and spotlight his racial background vis a vis the background of the inventors in Hip-Hop.
In my original post, I chose black athletes that had undeniable skill, well....hopefully you get the point by now.
Oh, by the way, there's this girl, about the same age as the Williams sisters, has about 5 Grand Slam singles titles, more Venus and Serena have combined, but gets, and has gotten a lot less press coverage over the same 4 year time period. Not that I'm saying they won't be greater in temrs of titles won eventually, but they're not even the most decorated of their age group, FYI.......
Anyway, to assign Eminem's success solely to his whiteness is myopic, especially because there are other proven factors of high record sales at work in his case. The fact you did not address any of them makes your original post flawed.
The other factors are:
1. Dre's proven track record at producing hit singles and platinum albums.
2. The fact that controversy, regardless of the race of the emcee, is known to boost record sales, as proven by NWA and 2 Live Crew.
3. The fact homosexuality is more socially acceptable now, as evidenced by positive/sensitive media coverage such as the Entertainment Weekly "Hooray for Gays" issue. Ergo, lyrics that criticize homosexuals are now more likely to make you a pariah than they were when NWA came up. This is why Ice Cube saying "dumbass hooker ain't nothin but a dyke" and Axl Rose wearing the AIDS kills fags dead T-shirt got less coverage relative to the current coverage of Em's and Allen Iverson's lyrics using anti-homosexual slurs.
4. MTV loves Dre with a passion. The fact Dre appeared in Em's first 2 videos helped make Em an established star.
5. Whiteness alone does not guarantee record sales. This is why House of Pain and Jesse James fell off, and why 3rd Bass was never the top selling group of their era or even on their label.
Second, if your issue is with less skilled rappers succeeding while the more talented struggle, why in the world would you use someone you concede has undeniable skill as an example. Clearly Cash Money, Nelly, PUffy and Big Willie are all better examples in terms of artists with less talent and/or less musical integrity than Eminem, as far as sub-par rhymes, ghostwriting, and jacking beats. The fact you ignored artists who lack skills yet still go platinum made your argument weaker, because, at the point you concede someone has skill, YOU imply they deserve success.
When I see someone with skill go platinum, I'm happy because it means that at least some quality hip-hop has met with success. I was happy about The Roots selling 800,000, even though they did it off the strength of the worst single they've ever released and replaced Jill Scott conveniently with the more radio/video friendly Erykah Badu. The point was, at least a group with skill was getting some financial success. I don't particularly enjoy "The Light" either, but I'm happy that Common achieved gold success and got MTV run off it. Would I have preferred that the aforementioned artists had blown up off better material, like "Clones" and "I Used to Love HER"? Yes, but the fact that they succeeded and are actually talented makes me happy enough, just as the fact I don't think either of the singles do them justice doesn't bug me enough to complain about it. The fact Em blew up means I'm guaranteed to turn on TRL and hear a talented emcee rip it for a change. That's a good thing. I think De La should sell at least 800,000 everytime out and that they're better than the Roots, but that doesn't mean I'll make a post at how blatant ?uest and co.'s success is. If you got skill and you blow up, good. If you're wack and you blow up, I hope you fall off. But it seems silly to point at a legimately skilled emcee and complain about success when there are much worse acts out there that will prove your point. If you were soooo bent on including whiteness in the discussion, you should have picked LFO and they're wack-ass "Summer Girls" bullshit. There were better examples, and you failed to choose them.
So that's why your argument was flawed to begin with. I mean by that construct, you could say "Dammit Black Thought's worse than Common on the mic. Common deserves the 800,000 sales, while Roots only deserve gold. Yeah, they're both skilled, but Com deserves it more." I mean, at that point it's more crabs in a barrel mentality than constructive. As if there's only one spot for a skilled emcee among the ranks of gold and platinum status............
I thought the point of being a hip-hop fan is to support good hip-hop, monetarily or otherwise. So I would never attack an emcee that's good, rather, I'd hope he'd use his fame to make sure other skilled emcee's make it to the same plateau.
Will Smith >is a fluke and you >know what? Most would >say his success is solely >based upon the fact that >"they" like him. . .he's >the exception, not the rule. >. .Blacks don't support Will >all like that- so now >what?
Sure: so is Puff, so was MC Hammer, so was Ma$e, so is Nelly, so is Juvenile, so is...you get the point. There are a lot of wack rappers that get love from MTV; WIllie has/had plenty of company so....as far as fluke status goes...you must have more flexible standards than I'm used to..........
Looks, there are plenty of white peeps that bought Tribe and De La too. I know a lot of them personally. So it's not only about the race of the people copping it. I mean, when ?uest and Com say white peeps outnumber the black at their shows, now what? Look blacks support good shit and bad shit, so do whites. When I was at Spitkicker and the crowd was capacity in a 2,000 people venue, I was just happy it was filled, regardless of the fact that it was at least 60% white. Anyway, since Willie's now officially sold out and wack and reliant on Nas and others to write his rhymes, and he gets all these "White" sales, isn't he still a better person to single out as a bastion of wackness then Em, who you admit has skills?
> >Consider yourself understood but disagreed with, >we are on opposite ends >on the spectrum on this >one.
I mean, there's very little to disagree with being that my original post was a satire. I don't really think MJ should be ashamed. Really, it's been fun arguing with you and Koala while you were clueless, but now that I've showed you the light, discussion should pretty much be over.
AIM: nichet00
"Even when I say nothing, it's a brilliant use of negative space" El-P
Raeshika: i bought slum used today Raeshika: returned it 3 hrs later. nichet00: ha ha nichet00: that should go in my sig nichet00: putting it in now
And your uninformed, whiny-assed, crybaby opinion would be?
www.myspace.com/inthecompanyoftinmen
|