|
what we need, five more posts? I might be willing to 'take one for the team' here.
>Ray Rhodes defensive players and Jim Johnson along with >McNABB'S legs were the reason eagles were in contention early >in his career. > did I say differently?
>>In 2001 despite the fact that the Eagles' near-upset of a >>juggernaut Rams team in their own stadium ended with a >McNabb >>drive that stalled at the 50, I blamed the loss on Buck & >>Vincent going down in the first half. We'd improved on the >>prior year & it still seemed like winning a title was >>inevitable. > >How did the Eagles get to the playoffs didn't that have a last >second drive against the giants for the NFC east? Who led that >drive > you might not be grasping that I'm speaking on the way in which each season ended, probably because you generally miss the point because you have no ability to evaluate Donovan McNabb objectively because you've personalized your fan experience to being about drunk guidos at the Linc being ignorant to you while you were selling them hot dogs there five years ago.
> >>In 2002, the year the Eagles truly were the best team in the >>league on paper than the Bucs & playing them in the last >game, >>I blamed the loss on Levon Kirkland missing an assignment on >>the Jurevicious play despite the fact that the game ended >when >>McNabb tossed a pick-six to Ronde Barber that sealed the >>game. > >The game was over they were gonna make the score 20-17 with 30 >seconds and Bucs had the top defense in the league. Gruden Out >coached Andy like shit. > Did McNabb play well in that game with his only touchdown being to the other team?
Like I said, I didn't blame him for that loss nor did I blame him for the previous two playoff defeats.......he didn't help though.
>>In 2003 I blamed Todd Pinkston & an uncalled spear hit for >the >>fact that McNabb threw four picks & the Eagles couldn't >>generate a single touchdown at home in a title game. If >McNabb >>had real receivers, our fate would change & I walked out of >>the stadium telling everyone that would listen on my way >back >>to the lots that the Fat Man better sign T.O. in the >>offseason. > >Actually he threw three picks and each one was a deflection by >the intended RECIEVER. I'm aware of how the picks came, I was there, I thought from memory that they're might have been an additional pick besides Ricky Manning's three but you're right it was three not four.
Like I said, I blamed Pinkston for that game. Bottom line is McNabb's 45% passing, 100 yards passing, 0 TDs and three picks didn't help. Also wasn't it McNabb that carried a >terrible offense against the Packers the previous game and >basically won the game for the eagles(the touchdown run and >4th and 26) > actually the offense, McNabb included, was mostly kept in check until the fourth and then a miracle play to Freddie & a Favre funball to Dawk was what we needed to pull off that miracle game......but I'll give McNabb credit for that, thing is that this post is talking about how the season *ended*.
>>In 2004 I tried to gloss over the fact that McNabb had three >>picks, puked all over the field & ran quite possibly the >worst >>two-minute drill mankind has ever seen because Andy gave up >on >>the run too early & T.O.'s gutty performance was the better >>story from an Eagle fan perspective. > >Okay you really count the pick at the end of the game with 30 >seconds to go on the eagles 2 yard line?(that pick was also >tipped off the hands of can't block or run good routes or >catch LJ smith. Also give credit to spy gate I believe McNabb >was sacked on the first play of the game straight up the >middle in what would be a 4 sack game with constant pressure. >He Had bad throws but again a systematic shut down offensive >line couldn't block Andy doesn't run and the Patriots screen >and call out all the Eagles Blitz packages presnap. > Yeah, if it's an interception I'm counting it, especially considering he was lucky to have two other turnovers called back.
The Super Bowl was not a good look for McNabb, who's performance that day could almost be classified by less forgiving people as a bit of a choke-job, I think anyone not named musa could probably admit that.
But as I said, I had put it passed me & not dwelled on it.
>>In 2005 I blamed T.O. & the organization's circus sideshow >>along with post-Super Bowl lethargy for a season that was >sunk >>long before they shut down McNabb for a sports hernia. I >also >>tried to look the other way when McNabb only started >>noticeably gimping around directly after he had thrown a >>pick-six to Roy Williams to end a horrific Monday Night >>performance versus Dallas. > >Okay so point is? > You're really not grasping this whole timeline concept well.
>>In 2006 I credited the Eagles' different offensive approach >>for the fact that the team seemed to play better without >>Donovan & that his going down again ended up resulting in an >>improbable playoff run with Jeff Garcia at the helm. > >LOL its funny they lost to the Saints because Garcia had a >water gun arm. Stallworth beat the saints all night with 9 >routes and Garcia couldn't throw the ball 40 yards. Also as >pathetic as Garcia's watergun arm was they couldn't stop the >saints from running the clock out when they had 8 MINUTES IN >THE 4TH QUARTER. > okay, not really sure what that has to do with what I said but anyway.
>>In 2007 as McNabb returned to lead almost the same group to >an >>8-8 finish, I copped pleas despite possibly our best >>performance that year being against an undefeated Patriots >>team with Van Wilder taking snaps. > >Okay and? > this wasn't intended to be complicated.
>>In 2008, the fact that we needed several miracles to come >>together on the last day of the season was irrelevant as the >>team went on an improbable run & even when another >game-saving >>final drive in a conference title game stalled out around >the >>50 I put the blame on the defense who did start & end the >game >>by giving up 90-yard TD drives. But hey, we had finally >found >>some young receiving talent to put around #5 & things were >>looking up. > >Your boy white lighting DROPPED A 4TH DOWN PASS DIRECTLY IN >HIS HANDS. > LOL @ Kevin Curtis being my boy. Like I said, I didn't dwell on it or blame him for that loss or really any of the others I listed. He got completely outplayed by Warner but oh well, at least Warner's a Hall of Famer & it was in Phoenix rather than Brad Johnson or Jake Delhomme at home.
>>As the 2009 season ends ignominously with two humiliating >>losses to the most hateable team/fanbase on earth, I'm >>officially done making excuses for this dude. > >So who do you blame for the Cowboys running up and down on the >defense and basically making the Eagles O line look like a >turnstile? > Find me a place where I spoke well of this defense? We knew what they were going in, the one who played suprisingly (or unsuprisingly) worse than they had all year was the quarterback.
>>He has always been an overly sensitive guy who nuts up at >the >>absolute worst possible time. The Greatest QB In >Philadelphia >>history? Sure. But that's more a commenary on Eagle history >>than his actual prowess. He's had a very good career but he >>lacks that last gear that would allow him to make it a great >>one. > >Its funny because that is the perfect description of Philly >media and fickle fans like you so sensitive whenever someone >puts a mirror to the idiocy and fickle lame nature of the >Philly fanatics you cry. Philly wants some fake ass movie >leader that gets all homotional and acts like the idiots in >the stands. Most MEN actually know how to control their >emotions and everyone doesn't have to show them. Also the >media that you are parroting hates on McNABB FOR SEVERAL >reasons but mainly because he doesn't play the media game or >give them good stories and quotables such as practice. They >view him as a uppity negro who doesn't flip out and actually >tell Philly media and fanatics such as yourself about >yourself. You clearly got an agenda Andy Reid is the sole >reason eagles ain't winning shit this team except for 2004 was >never prepared to win a superbowl. If that 2002 team had one >reciever things might have been different. Philly is the >underdog because the teams are always deficient show me a >superbowl team where the QUARTERBACK CARRIES THE TEAM TO A >VICTORY? It takes a Team effort and it doesn't help when you >have a predictable stubborn coach who doesn't like to draft or >sign talent at KEY POSITIONS SUCH AS WR AND LINEBACKER IN A >PASS HAPPY OFFENSE CAN'T STOP THE RUN DEFENSE. > you mighta had a point with that 'underdog' angle if they weren't the odds-on favorite in three different NFC Championship Game losses, two of them by more than a touchdown.
the difference between me and you is I can criticize Reid and McNabb for their respective flaws, while you've made Reid into being a total blithering idiot whose sole purpose is to sabotage the career of poor Donovan McNabb.
That's because you've made this personal while I'm just talking about my team & don't really have a vested interest in one of these guys being a hero & the other a boogeyman.
>>Despite all the other factors (particularly in last night's >>debacle when no one played well) at some point you gotta >>actually look at the one constant in this team's postseason >>failures. >> >>Every truly elite quarterback of this same era (Warner, >Brady, >>Manning, Roethlisberger) found a way to come up with the >kind >>of big drives that result in a championship when things >looked >>their bleakest & the pressure was highest. > >Warner won a superbowl with Issac Bruce Torry Holt and >Marshall Faulk(and it wasn't on a last second drive either). >Brady has the tuck role and the kicker viniterrwhatever to >thank for his superbowls) Manning was terrible in the >superbowl he has Addai and his defense to thank for the >superbowl and his brother has the prayer catch and a drop by >Asante Samuel to thank. Can't say anything contrary about >Roethlisberger. > they all have rings while we got excuses, they all made crucial plays & big drives along the way to getting there.
>>Can any Eagle fan with any sense at all really look inward >and >>say that from here on out even if the Eagles address their >>glaring holes in the offseason, they really believe that >>Donovan is capable of winning this team their first Super >Bowl >>title? I can't, not with the overwhelming evidence pointing >to >>the opposite. > >Sure he can their problem isn't on offense. > if you believe that you're entitled to your opinion, I wish I still did.
>>So let's just get it over with & see what we can get for the >>dude, even if you have to trade him in the divison to the >>Skins. If Danny wants to give away picks & we can spend >>McNabb's 10+ million-dollar salary on other needs than so be >>it. > >If the eagles were to trade McNabb they would not send him to >the Skins he would destroy Philly. > If the Skins want to give away first round picks per usual on another big name, I wouldn't argue with them.
Him 'destroying Philly' would only occur if he was to win a Super Bowl in D.C. That would not happen.
I fear McNabb in a Skins' uniform only slightly more than I did Eric Lindros in a Ranger one, because I'd say due to not having the concussion issues McNabb has a bit more left than E did when he got to NYC.
>>He never liked the city & in turn we never really liked >>him......at least like we do other less calculated & >>hyper-sensitive stars here (Barkley, AI, Dawkins, JRoll). > >He never liked the media or the fickle types like you. McNabb >supporters are not as vocal and wrong as you haters. > nah, he just didn't give us reason to get behind him to that level, everything McNabb does is from a distance in terms of his relationship with the city and he's been holding a grudge keeping it at arm's distance since the Cataldi-led draft debacle.
>>Donovan will be remembered more as this decade's Eric >Lindros >>in Philadelphia. Supremely talented but fatefully flawed. >Two >>guys with stage parents & suspect leadership skills whose >>tenure here will end sourly. > >So what does that Make Andy Reid Charlie Manuel? > there's not an analogy that fits as well for Reid but Manuel wouldn't be it.
|