|
>You've been on my ass with lil' subliminal comments for awhile >now sweetheart -- ((OFF & ON))) -- SO PLEASE DON'T THINK I >HAVEN'T NOTICED IT -- (But they were subliminal enuff that no >one else would notice -- So you done good! -- *wink~wink*)
Honestly, I have no idea what you are talking about. There are a few people on here that you have experienced your share of e-beef with, and I have always defended you.
"Photo is misunderstood, she means no harm." (c) Tek
However, today you painted quite a picture for me. You assume an aweful lot. You take things WAYY out of context. And you find insult and injury where there is none. Why?
Tek doens't know.
> >But you've had a bit of a attitude with me for a hottt minute >now, and I ain't stupid enough not to recognize it.
You are mistaken. Riddle me this Photo, who is the person that sends you an inbox from time to time asking how you are?
Tek is.
I don't send inboxes to people I don't appreciate. Also, whatever attitude you perceived was probably not attitude at all. It was a probably a question or comment that you took out of context, such as you demonstrated today.
> >I'm sure if only Willi had mentioned your sounding like Aesop, >you wouldn't have had a problem with it -- BUT BECAUSE I >DITTO'D HIS COMMENT -- You wanna challenge why heads think you >sound like him -- With puzzlement!?!?
Lol, what? Okay, I was waiting for this post to pick up as many replies as possible so I could thank everyone and ask my questions. Even if you wouldn't have replied, I would have asked why people thought I sounded like Aesop Rock.
It was not because of you. Why do you think my thank you and question post revolves around you? It really doesn't Photo. You are no better or worse than anyone on this board.
> >I've read on previous threads of yours (IN THE PAST) where >folks said you reminded them of Aesop and you didn't seem to >have a problem with it. These were threads that I couldn't >even HEAR myself, cuz the link wouldn't upload 4 me -- But it >was alright then, huh?
It was never alright, or not alright. I just so happened to ask why people thought so today.
> >I clarified for you the reason WHY I chose blak's joint. >
You did. In an insulting and condescending way. Anyone with half a brain can see that.
>I have a right to my opinion too, yaknow? -- AND MY OPINION >SEZ, YOUR SOUND/YOUR STYLE REMINDS ME OF AESOPROCK. I'm >entitled to that.
Yes, I know that. I wasn't questioning your opinion. I was just asking for clarification because I don't hear any similarity between Aesop and I. Do I not have a right to ask? Jeez. You make it seem like I attacked you for having an opinion. I don't even recall your name coming up in my post.
> >You ain't gotta agree with me about my perception of "HOW YOU >SOUND" -- But my response to your work was *no doubt* >positive. >
Yes it was. However, when I asked a question. You came at me in full battle mode, which was very lame and uncalled for.
>Yet you weren't happy with that, were you? > >So you had to dig a little deeper and challenge it, huh?
That logic is dellusional.
> >Whatever your problem is with me Tek -- IT'S YOUR PROBLEM -- >Cuz I ain't got no problems with you -- Other than your acting >shitty with me lately. >
Seriously, I have no idea what the eff you are talking about. lol
>But I will check your ass if you think you're gonna get by >with slipping summmm subliminal shit on my plate for me to eat >-- CUZ I DON'T EAT SHIT! --  >
Well, you are spewing a lot of it today. I'm sorry, but that's the truth.
Peace
@}-,-`-
True indeed, knahmsayin, but when it's real you doin this even without a record contract, knahmsayin? ~ Nas No question! ~ AZ
http://www.soundclick.com/afreestylemotif/
|