|
I agree with a lot of Frank Longo's comments below. The artistic freedom is in part due to their success. And part of this success has to do with having more radio and club friendly singles. (Plus I have my own theory about southern rappers being more accessible to casual listeners).
What struck me in your comments is the idea that the roots have some formula that they are following and that outkast has been able to avoid that trap. The basic gist of your point has been said in different ways on this board. And to me it implies that Outkast is more talented than the Roots(even if that's not what you meant), and I don't think that's true, maybe the reverse is true. I don't know
If you're an artist of any kind, I'm sure you know the difficulties you face when you want to maintain your artistic integrity and not just create for the marketplace, but still develop an audience and be successful at the same time. It's an age old dilemma that every artist has to figure out for themselves.
But I guess the way I see it, since this is a business, and part of succeeding in any business, whether it's the "art" business or any other kind, is strategy and thinking strategically about your choices. I would bet money, that Outkast is not just making music according to what they like and it just so happens that it is well received and garners them lots of fans. They have a strategy, they have carefully crafted images, they want/wanted fans as much as the Roots, and I'm sure they had in mind the kind of success they wanted and have pursued it. Certain principles help you succeed in whatever your doing. Art/the entertainment industry is not different in that respect.
Obviously the Roots also have a strategy, otherwise, I doubt thay they would be as successful as they are. Now you may say that their strategy isn't effective as Outkast's or that you don't necessarily like their strategy and could make a case for those points.
But I don't know about saying they are following a formula but Outkast isn't. I guess it also depends on how you define formula. When I think of formula, i think of lot of what's on the radio, where the artist is interchangeable. It could be cassidy, bow wow, or the man on the moon over a producers track, because the front man isn't the real force behind the music or the creation.
It's easy to draw the conclusion that Outkast is on another level than the Roots since they have been more commercially successful and have a larger fan base than the Roots. But I think that has more to do with marketing, timing, luck, and audience receptiveness. Take that commercial success out of the equation (cause we all know talent does not automatically equal success, and success damn sure don't necessarily equal talent), do you really think artistically Outkast surpasses the Roots (and not on some I just prefer this kind of music better tip).
I'm assuming you think Don't Say Nuthin' is formulaic and is made for the audience. What else of their work is formulaic in your opinion? ______________
blah
_______________
blah
|