|
>“…as you sing your senseless songs for the mindless/your >general subject, love, is minimal/it’s sex for profit” – >Chuck D, “caught, can I get a witness?” > >(I know I always say that I haven’t had a new idea since >September/October 2001, but this is ridiculous. I’m getting >this weird déjà vu feeling like I’ve made a post with this >title some time in the past…) > >anyway, I’m doing this mainly for the benefit of Ghetto who >seemed to be kinda offended by my statement in the Boyz II >Men post that “most R&B singers are some dumb >motherfuckers.” > >I know I’m dating myself, but I really miss the days when >“R&B singer” was such a contemptible designation that a lot >of younger R&B acts actively tried to disassociate >themselves from it, choosing instead to align themselves >with the “edgier” hip-hop (sadly, we can look around us now >and see where THAT got us). > >you know lately I’ve always voiced my dissatisfaction with a >lot of Black music from the period of roughly 1977-1986, >indicting it for its “emptiness” and “spiritual/intellectual >bankruptcy” or (as Warren Coolidge never lets me live down) >I have said that it all reeks of cocaine and joyless >hedonism to me. not that there’s anything wrong with that… a >lot of the music I like is willfully stupid and meant for >nothing but a quick fix of good times. but for some reason, >I always hold Black music to this higher standard where I >expect that beyond the immediate message of dancing, fucking >and shopping, that there should be some kind of higher >“meaning” in it, whether or not I actually subscribe to that >meaning. > >I mean, during the “golden age,” one of the things that made >hip-hop so fresh and exciting was the fact that it offered a >point of view… hell, multiple points of view. you would >listen to the lyrically content, or check out interviews >with rappers to hear them express strong opinions on Black >nationalism, or gangsterism, or why sucker MCs are bad, or >why hip-hop needs respect, or how we’re heading for >self-destruction… you listened to hip-hop and you felt that >you were some kind of MOVEMENT. more than that, hip-hop was >like stand-up comedy, in that it was one of the last >bastions of true self-expression. hip-hop gave the listener >more access to the mind of the artist than any other kind of >music (which is the reason I still believe ghost-writing has >no place in it). until maybe 1995 or 96, it was really >important in hip-hop to “represent”; to stand for something… >anything! > >it’s been a long time since R&B artists stood for anything >at all. all they ever sing about is love, and they tend to >do it in the most clichéd and boring ways imaginable. most >of them don’t even write or produce their own music, so >basically all they do is show up in the studio. I often find >myself wondering about the interior lives of these R&B >singers. what do they think about? what do they care about? >do they go about all day with thoughts like the ones they >convey on their records? >
Someone has already mentioned this Af...but you really need to be more specific. What you need to show us here is specific examples of R&B artists in the past who stood for something...who did it "right".....so that you can draw a comparison with todays artists who are doing it wrong. I would submit that over 90% of the so-called R&B songs of the past were about love....there were very very few exceptions...marvin Gaye did What's going on..but what else besides that album did Marvin sing about anything but love...same with Al Green and Otis Redding...every song pretty much that they ever made was about love....So to say that today's R&B is bad because all they talk about is love....seems to be an inaccurate summation considering that has always been the case.
>I have no idea. and I guess it doesn’t even matter… what >bothers ME, is the very simpleminded attitude they seem to >have about their own art. I mean, in hip-hop you at least >get people who are enthusiastic about music. maybe it’s >because of the sample-based nature of the music, but hip-hop >artists (or these days, hip-hop producers, at least) really >care about music and listen to various kinds of things.
I couldn't disagree more. What hip hop artist obviously listens to different types of music? Sure maybe some producers do in their quest to make beats.....but even that is becoming more scarse in the mainstream..I mean, I don't listen to the Neptunes production and here all sorts of influences from all sorts of sources.....Plus, I don't think it's easy to distinguish mainstream hip hop and R&B today...they are pretty much the same thing. There in lies the problem...
> >R&B singers tend to listen to mostly R&B. and I don’t even >mean classic shit…
that's a pretty generalized statement....I don't remember seeing any poll done on R&B artists....I do know that to make it on the radio today...so-called R&B artists must fit into the HipHop/R&B format that is damn near the only urban format today...so thus, listening to, or even being influenced by classic soul or funk is not condusive to having a successful career today....and that is the problem.
they listen to their peers. or maybe they >listen to gospel. they tend to be infatuated with other >singers. have you ever noticed how excited R&B singers get >when they hear all kinds of pointless melismatics and shit?
uh...no...I've never noticed that.
>they start talking about how so-and-so “can blow,” like >anybody gives a crap.
Well maybe not for you Af...but some people look at the ability to sing, or "blow" as you say...as being a good thing. Many people care about this...there are classic artists who we know about today primarily because they can "blow"..so yes, it does mean something. Now I will say that due to the demise in creativity...real musicianship...the narrowing down of genres marketed to urban areas...all of this has lowered the bar so much that there are people who actually compare or at least put folks like R. Kelly or Mary J. in the same sentence as Marvin Gaye, or Aretha.....that is just sad.
I don’t think most of these cats even >**like** music that much. they just lucked out to be able to >sing and figured it was a good way to get paid and laid.
I really don't see what type of evidence you would have to measure how much anyone likes music besides yourself. You must remember that ....I heard Rick James say in an interview once that for him to even think that he could make it in the music busines...he knew he had to learn how to read and write music...how to perform live on stage, and how to play.....otherwise he was wasting his time. Today...none of those things are a necessity to make it in the music business...and it's not all on the artists...the artists have not lowered the bar....the bar has been lowered by the music industry..and people have just allowed it to happen. They have allowed one of the greatest American treasures...Black music to be pimped out...
> >and this emptiness is not even a recent phenomenon… it’s >been there since the dawn of the post-Soul era that I’ve >been railing against lately. but (as much as I hate to say >anything that Warren will probably co-sign on) I think that >it was covered up by the fact that they actually had >half-decent bands backing them.
Now was that so hard Af...it's only taking you what, 3 years to admit to this..lol. I wouldn't seperate the band from the artist though...it should be looked at as one entity...and today that entity does not include the band......
but I still say Af that you are mistaken that R&B prior to this point you're referencing dealt with many things besides love....over 90% of Al Green, Otis Redding and all deal with that.
> >you had your Brass Construction, your Midnight Star, your >Atlantic Starr, your Starpoint, your One Way, your Skyy… all >of those bands were as empty as hell and “represented” >nothing. but you didn’t give a fuck because they had some >funky bands making some cool music you could dance to AND >think about (to some degree), so there was SOME value to it.
even though you're resisting giving this era all its props...I see you're coming around....this era had some very very good sometimes great music being done by some very very talented artists. You're getting there AF...
>with these current motherfuckers skull-fucking Shuggie Otis >or singing over tracks you liked better when they were >KRS-One and Pharcyde records, what else do you have to >concentrate on besides their fatuous “lyrics” (“words set to >music” is more like it)? how self-deluded are they to think >that we should care?
People have always wanted to hear love songs....whether is the Blues and folks singing about the more melancholy side...or Gospel where people are singing about love for their Lord...or R&B or Soul with people singing about love for a man or woman...it's always been there and will always be there....I'll agree with you that the song writing has fallen off....i think it's fallen off a great deal from the era that you referenced..late 70's early 80's...I mean, these cats today wish they could make some songs like Midnight Star, or Slave, or LTD....today's music is so far beneath that era....and add to the fact that musicianship is dying....today folks talk about "Beats"...instead of Music. Big difference. Oh yeah...I doubt most young cats today even know who Shuggie Otis is. I think his "influence" is overrated a lot round here...I think it's more that his sound is like a sound that we hear sometimes today, "neo-soul-ish" but I seriously doubt that he actually influenced these people.
>you see… this is the kind of “heroism” I was alluding to the >other day in the Whispers post.
Examples Af....Give us ..and not just a couple since you are making such a big point about this.....give us numerous examples of "heroism" in past R&B...give us examples of song content beyond love.
sure, someone like Cody >ChesnuTT is an artist who has assiduously crafted his own >mythology, so I won’t claim to know anything about who he >REALLY is, but when you listen to his record, you get a >better idea of what he “represents” than you do from >listening to the Whispers or any other group like that.
uh...no...I get the impression that Cody is trying to be a boho-hippie, yet street-asthetic cat...I view him as pretentous lyriclly......I guess he is trying to do something outside the norm...but the Whispers made love songs...that's what they did...and they did it very well. In the traditon of past groups like the Temps, the tops, the O'Jays....there is a lot of value to that music...and lord knows the artists of today have totally missed that boat.
>there’s more courage, more nakedness, more truth. and that’s >one of the things I believe makes him an honest-to-goodness >modern Soul man,
??? so again, I ask...who in the past did this in R&B...or are you saying that Cody did something that has never been done before....I don't even think he would consider himself a soul artist.
even though he doesn’t perform in a >straight Soul style. because he "represents," whether you >like it or not.
I think you're reaching here...there is ZERO about cody Chestnutt that is consistent with your golden era of soul....you were closer when you were calling him a Blues man...but now you're switching up just to try and justify him being some sort of trailblazer today....He really doesn't measure up at all in my opinion...personally...I'm looking to other genres and seeing a more musicianshiped based music that is more soulful then most stuff today...I don't see it in Cody at all...there is some stuff in the Nu-jazz, or whatever you call the genre, that is just more soulful, musically sound...and with vocal qualities that to me, is often filling the void of what Black American urban music has degenerated into. but Cody's your boy...i just don't hear it...
|