|
>I tried to watch the show several times, but it was too much >of a replication of PTI, but >lacking personality, and I’m not that huge of a PTI fan. The >platform is focused more on debating and less on discussion. >Also, the show has a very arrogant tone to it, especially in >how they deliver their dialogue, thinking they know more than >everyone else. It’s cut from that LeBatard or highly >questionable cloth (another show that I dislike). Those shows >that have absolute takes, and that no other takes matter. Too >subjective. > >I watch The Jump, Jalen and Jacoby, and I can stomach PTI. >What makes Jalen and Jacoby work so well is that their show is >a combination of debate and discussion. The communication is >balanced. They are not barking at each other, and they are not >just going along for the ride either. > >I grew up listening to sports radio and still listen to sports >radio, as well as watching the sports reporter on espn. The >debates and discussions are and were more in depth, and not >just aggressive 1-2 minute hot takes, and they didn’t and >don’t take shots at each other. > >Highly Questionable, Around the Horn, PTI, and High Noon are >all the same thing, where they give these quick hot takes in a >certain amount of time, and they all come on right after each >other. Sooner or later the audience is going to get bored or >disinterested , and that’s going to lead to shows getting >cancelled or left out because of overcrowding of shows that >all do the same thing. > > >
|