> >Just think that through, and think about which girls are most >likely to be exposed to this evil violation. If people think >this duty of "protection" isn't going to be used as a way to >enforce racial and heteronormative ideals of the "right" kind >of girl, then I think they're being extremely naive.
it's the most slippery slope. parents will get mad that their kid is losing and will point to the winner and say they should be checked.