82. "RE: Would it be newsworthy if the children weren't his..." In response to In response to 81
>...and she "disclosed" the abortion to somehow leverage him?
Since there's no way to determine the DNA of the underdeveloped fetus(es) - no. And "newsworthy" as a legal term refers to something that the public has a legitimate interest to know - such as whether a govt. official is lying or committing fraud/criminal acts -- newsworthy (as a legal term of art) does not mean something that simply lights up the social media sphere.
>I mean it's terrible all around..... > >No one emerges from that smelling sweet... > >I could only imagine what a judge hearing this would be >like....
Wouldn't be good for Floyd. The key here is the sensitive nature of the private medical records and the invasion of her privacy. Even if she gave Floyd the medical records - he still has no right to publicize those records because they are still privileged - and she only consented to him seeing them, not the world at large.