Mainly because he chose wack a** Washington.

I mean, how much of his numbers are usage vs actual talent?

If he was on a better team, I'd feel more comfortable with it. Same reason I was a little apprehensive about Simmons (26% usage) but at min he has size on his side.

I like Fultz tho...he can ball, I'm just a little worried he's jumped in line due to his ability to dominate the ball on a bad team. He has a 31% usage rate (comparatively, Ball's is 18%). There's a lot of good stuff to unpack about his game but his situation gives me a slight speedbump of pause.

I mean, UCLA beat them by 41. How am I supposed to compare him vs ball in that game if it's literally over before it starts?

____________